Letters: May 2018

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Time isn’t of the essence

I read with great interest Mark Hughes’ article on the recent driver choice dilemma facing Williams. Mark explains the difficulty in balancing commercial and sporting equations that Williams has needed to address in a very clear and articulate manner. The problems facing an independent team in current Formula 1 are very clear, mainly due to the imbalances of income and the skew towards the large and already well-funded teams.

There has been talk of cost caps etc for some years, but alas without any meaningful effect. A major issue has to be that massive portions of the teams’ budgets are directed to the research and development of aerodynamics, which increases levels of downforce and pushes budgetary costs beyond the reach of the smaller teams – it’s all disproportionate to the funding needed simply to run a team. That such sums are spent to find nanoseconds of time is astonishing, especially with the resulting (negative) effect on racing quality.

The increasing levels of downforce have been a major topic among fans and the motor sport media, all of whom want reduced downforce and decent racing. These views are obviously of an alien nature to the team technicians; they are focused on those ‘vital’ nanoseconds and never mind the fans, aka the ones who pay the team bills. It would appear that the teams have a self-perpetuating desire to get bigger and spend ever larger sums on things only they desire, to the detriment of F1, laughably these days still called ‘Grand Prix’ racing.

I suppose it is possible that the various technical committees that are exploring the workings of F1 will emerge from their current state of torpor and burst into action. In all this the FIA is notable for its silence, while Liberty comes up with really important decisions such as not having grid girls any more.

The closed and rather insular world of F1 is indeed strange.
Neil Davey, Newport, South Wales

 

Being Fred Gallagher…

I had the good fortune to be at three diverse events in 1985 (Motor Sport, March): Safari Rally, Le Mans and the European Grand Prix at Brands Hatch.

The most memorable was the Safari. Björn Waldegård was supposed to win in Toyota Celica no3, but Juha Kankkunen was the surprise winner in no21. All the publicity shots had been taken of Waldegård’s car.

A few days after the event, I posed as Kankkunen’s co-driver Fred Gallagher while a Toyota mechanic (British) drove no21 around some gravel tracks near Nairobi airport to obtain pictures of the winning car “in action”.

Le Mans was certainly a spectacle and Mansell’s win at Brands made me a huge fan. I ended up having the pleasure of seeing his final win in a single-seater when he beat Emerson Fittipaldi in a Grand Prix Masters event at the new Kyalami circuit.
Ian Dove, Cape Town, South Africa

 

When the wheels come off

Further to Neil Kirby’s letter – and in particular the Porsche 956’s propensity to lose front wheels – I recall this happened generally to the private teams. I read (probably in Motor Sport) that such teams did not believe that the torque figures provided by Porsche for the wheel nuts could possibly be correct, in that they seemed to be far too high, and the use of lower settings led to the problem.

I also remember, while at one of the Silverstone long-distance races, an interview with David Hobbs in which he said he heard a bang and felt the handling go somewhat awry. Not being sure what was wrong, he thought it best to pit and get the car checked over. The crew promptly replaced the missing wheel. He seemed to think it quite amusing that, having raced for some 20 years, he was unable to tell how many wheels were on the car.
Tony Elgood, Beckenham

 

Retro thanks

I’m just writing to say how much I enjoyed my visit to Race Retro in February. The guests on the Motor Sport stage were on their own worth the admission fee. Brian Redman in particular gave vivid recollections of a very different and dangerous era of motor racing.

I’m looking forward to attending next year’s show. Might I suggest Jackie Oliver would be a great draw on the Motor Sport live interview stage!
DM Barker, via email

 

A mechanic writes

I have just bought the April copy of Motor Sport and found an error. You have a photo showing Frank Matich’s F5000 McLaren M10B at Laguna Seca, dated 1973.

The shot was actually taken in 1971. I was chief mechanic at Frank Matich Racing, and Frank came second to David Hobbs that weekend. In 1973 we raced our own Matich A51s at Laguna Seca
Derek Kneller, via email

 

Special brew

It has been interesting to read your tests of 1970s racing saloons such as the Cologne Capri. As a club saloon car racer in this period, the technology of such cars was of interest, though with limited amateur budgets we could not easily emulate their capability. However, by the lucky chance of choosing to race a second-hand Vauxhall Viva GT, and less fortunately needing to rebuild its mechanical parts into a new shell, we came to be involved with Bill Blydenstein’s DTV establishment at Shepreth, and thus gained access to decent racing technology.

My Firenza shell started as a replacement for ‘Old Nail’, which was Gerry Marshall’s mainstay racer. But with his team developing plans for ‘Big Bertha’, a Ventora, my need for a new shell was solved, and in the summer of 1973 we made a new racing car with glassfibre panels and so on.

Over the next two years it evolved into a ‘droopsnoot’ and gained more bhp with a 2.3 fuel-injection motor (circa 210bhp). But my car was not unique; there were several Vauxhall Firenzas operating in the club scene and competitive with Ford Escorts etc. The arrival of more silhouette racers and their more powerful engines (some of them V8s) did rather diminish competitive comparability, although in adverse weather conditions one could be on the front row in qualifying ahead of these.

In 1976 a second Firenza (from Scotland) was campaigned with rather more enhanced running gear, as funds for our own silhouette racer never materialised – we were planning a Chevron B19 with Imp bodywork. Unlike Gerry Marshall I did not enjoy a great deal of success, with only six race victories over the two seasons of 1975 and 1976.

I wonder how a technical analysis would assess the potential of these club Vauxhalls. Our racing was restricted by the national fuel crisis, reduced practice periods and reduced race laps. Most race meetings had a special saloon event, however, so one could compete fairly frequently.
Phil Clarke, Norwich, Norfolk

 

Time flies

It was a strange coincidence to see a photo of the old BRDC Silverstone timekeepers’ building in You were there (March 2018).

Back in the 1960s Corgi Toys produced a set of Silverstone buildings in kit form – pits, press box and timekeepers’ building. All of them appeared in your photo.

I don’t know whatever happened to mine – my mother probably threw them away – but I recently tried to buy them again.

When I eventually tracked down a timekeepers’ building it was still unbuilt and boxed. The asking price? £6221.00 – and that didn’t even include postage! (Yes, that does say six thousand, two hundred and twenty one pounds.)

I was sad to see that Dan Gurney has died. I watched him hassle Jim Clark into crashing at Brands Hatch in 1965. They say ‘never meet your heroes’, but I did at Goodwood in 1995: a great driver and a really nice guy.
John Day, West Sussex

 

Embracing change

Like so many who write in, I have been a loyal reader since the days of Jenks and The Bod. Being of a certain age, I am a bit wary of ‘the latest thing’. I’m also aware that the only constant is change, and I have seen your great publication evolve over the years. Regarding the recent ‘refresh’: well done! We will miss Nigel Roebuck, of course, but Doug Nye continues to be an absolute treasure. Mat, Simon, Gordon, Andrew… on every single page the quality of the writing is excellent, and unequalled elsewhere.

I am compelled to write, for the first time, to compliment you on one particular change. It took me about 2.5 articles to go from “Who the heck is Dickie Meaden?” to “I want to be Dickie Meaden!”
Jeffrey Ducken, Bonney Lake, Washington, USA

 

Don’t mix sport & politics

I’d like to agree with Anthony Schofield’s letter (April 2018), about political comments being unnecessary in Motor Sport. I was moved to write the same thing and he saved me the trouble, as well as expressing it very well.

The only other thing to say is that if the British were even half as good at the economy as they are at motor racing, one would be a lot less worried about the future…
Graham O’Reilly, France

 

Rose-tinted spectacular

Let’s start with a bold statement. The March 2018 edition of Motor Sport has the best content I have ever seen. Like ever! It’s exactly 40 years since I read my first Motor Sport – March 78 – and the race reports from DSJ of the South American GP’s and his blunt assessment of certain performances and incidents made a huge impression on a knowledge-hungry 11-year-old …

Reading the Explosive ’80s features – brilliantly crafted and illustrated by Arron, Hughes, Watkins, Oxley etc – I agree with Colin Goodwin that ’85 was the best year of all. I remember meeting a red-booted, smoking Keke and doing my first FF1600 race. Good heavens, what wonderful memories…

The article on the amazing Mike Fairholme (who painted my Bell XFM1 in a pseudo-Martin Donnelly livery in 1989), your tribute to the remarkable Dan Gurney, the interview with Felipe Massa. My word, this was my idea my idea of heaven…

My wonderful wife illustrated the meaning of true love when she got me a Motor Sport subscription for my birthday… and this edition alone has made it worthwhile.

In closing, Matters of Moment took back me to 1986. Like Nick Trott I can remember the ‘digital’ speed readout on the old gantry over the pit lane at Brands Hatch… and the whooshing noise… and Ayrton Senna prodding at the throttle through Clearways…

As I get older those memories become so much more precious. I am so glad to have been there and so glad that the Green ’Un revealed such wonderful, evocative stories that always make me smile.

My 24-year-old son has inherited my passion for the sport. He said to me, “The 1980s are motor sport perfection.”

We were there. Weren’t we lucky?
Simon Hill, Kent


Write to: Motor Sport, 18-20 Rosemont Road, London NW3 6NE or e-mail by TAPPING HEREPlease include your full name and address when corresponding.