'Which would be quicker – a historic F1 car or a modern Revolution sports racer?'

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Sometimes the best plans just don’t work out. I’d been invited to Donington to test a Revolution SC500, an open sports racer created by Phil Abbott who had founded Radical a quarter of a century ago. But I wanted another angle, a way of explaining to you how fast racing cars are today even when they’re merely rather expensive (£160,000 with all the trick bits) rather than completely out of sight.

And it happened that Nick Padmore would be at the very same test, at the wheel of a 1970s historic F1 car. I wondered which would be quicker, realised I had no idea and thence came the idea: test the Revolution and the F1 car together and see not just which was quicker, but where. Both had around 500bhp; the F1 car would be lighter than the 800kg Revolution, but have a fraction of the downforce. I thought it could be quite close.

So did Padmore when we compared his best times in an F1 car to those of Revolution’s test driver. But the owner of the F1 car would only let Nick drive, and without being able to say I’d done what I was writing about, we had no story. And that was that. Nor do I blame the owner: if I had a 1970s F1 car I’d be pretty proscriptive about who drove it too.

Which meant I’d only drive the Revolution, not that this was a hardship. Five hundred horsepower in a carbon tub slicks and wings racer weighing less than a Fiat Panda is unlikely to be boring. But for all that power, there is so much grip the Craner Curves are a mere acceleration zone, the car kissing the apex of the blind entry downhill corner at 148mph pulling approximately 2.5g lateral. At least with James Abbott, Phil’s son and said test driver, at the wheel. Me? I was too scared to see what a coward I’d been to ask.

“Jackie Stewart would have been a real whizz with data”

Because it is of course all there for you to see. Every turn of the wheel, stab at the throttle, prod of the brakes turned into multi-coloured lines, spilled across the width of a computer screen. And without hours spent analysing such data, your chance of turning in a competitive lap time in such a car is essentially zero. I know someone who has been a frequent competitor in GT3 who says over the course of a weekend he’ll spend more time with the data than driving the car.

Which is fine as far as it goes and is, actually, more likely to benefit an enthusiastic amateur racer like me than a full-time professional, because he or she won’t be doing much wrong in the first place. Whereas with me… A couple of years back I came second in a McLaren GT4 race at Spa having been the slowest in the field in free practice two days earlier. Thanks to the data, I had literally learned how to go faster, which was interesting and rewarding – but actually and ultimately I’d rather have spent the screen time in the car.

But all this data talk did make me wonder how different the history of motor racing might have been had it always existed. Which drivers would have made the most of it, and who would have dismissed it saying they don’t need to be told what they’re doing because they already know?

I may be doing them an enormous disservice, but I can’t see drivers like Mike Hawthorn or Innes Ireland having a lot of time for data. However, Sir Jackie Stewart would, I am sure, have been an absolute whizz at it which would only have made him even more dominant. James Hunt and Ronnie Peterson? I don’t think so. Niki Lauda and Alain Prost? You bet.

But who’d have done best with it? Probably Stirling, and for two reasons. First he was one of the first drivers, perhaps the first, to take a wholly professional approach to the business of motor racing, which combined with his God-given talent made him close to unbeatable on a level playing field. Secondly, he was fascinated by technology. He loved new kit, whether it was on his racing car at the track or in his home in London. I can quite see him recognising at once the benefit it brought – the ‘unfair advantage’ as Mark Donohue would have put it – and striven to exploit it to the maximum. Given how often he got so close, it would have probably won him some titles too.

I note that the Texas company which owns the name is starting to tease a new DeLorean. Called the DeLorean EVolved, all we know is that it will be an EV as the name suggests and that the iconic gullwing doors will be retained. I usually groan at such exhumations, not least because so few make it across the bridge to reality but actually, I think this one has a chance.

First, with modern EV ‘skateboard’ design you can buy a complete powertrain and platform off the peg and simply reclothe it, decimating the time and cost of engineering your own units. Second, and thanks entirely to an enduringly popular film franchise and not at all to John Z DeLorean, the brand remains front and centre in our minds over 40 years after the last one was built. Finally, and crucially, the old one was rubbish meaning there’s not even much of an act to follow, let alone impossibly big shoes to fill. If it’s merely reasonable by the standards of the competition it will already have achieved far more than the original ever did.


A former editor of Motor Sport, Andrew splits his time between testing the latest road cars and racing (mostly) historic machinery
Follow Andrew on Twitter @Andrew_Frankel

You may also like

Related products