BLMC replies to MS

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Sir,

When you did us the honour in September of devoting your entire editorial to British Leyland, I felt it incumbent upon me to reply. As you said, however, you were going to have another little go at us in the October issue and it might be better to wait until November to reply to the whole lot in one fell swoop. To take both of your editorials point by point and correct what we believe to be your wrong impressions would, however, I fear take much more space than I presume you are prepared to devote in your correspondence section.

There seems to be a wide difference of opinion between your publication and ourselves and I feel the only way that we can give your readers a satisfactory impression of what British Leyland is trying to achieve would be for you to come around to see us at our headquarters in Berkeley Square House and fire at us all the questions, allegations, rude remarks and suggestions you would wish.

May I, therefore, invite you, Mr. Boddy, together with any members of your staff you may care to bring along, to come round to see Lord Stokes and any other executives appropriate to the circumstances. I can assure you that you will be very welcome and that the replies you get will be factual, informative and frank. Please let me know when this will be convenient for you and I do hope that you will be fair enough to publish a factual account of the proceedings.

I would like to correct just one impression now, however, which emerges from your editorials and indeed this is enhanced by the little balls of fire you toss our way on other occasions—you obviously feel that British Leyland doesn’t like or doesn’t care about Motor Sport. You couldn’t be further from the truth. We like you, we read you, you stimulate us—we listen to the criticisms, both yours and those of your readers. We even get a little praise now and again and we love that especially. You’re bright, tough, contentious, lively and damned prejudiced and we wouldn’t have you any other way.

KEITH HOPKINS, Director of Public Relations. – London, W1

[We are delighted to accept this invitation and look forward to an early meeting with Lord Stokes.—Ed.]

Related articles

Related products