I write with some thoughts on D.S. J.’s challenging thoughts on safety.
I he very first thought arising is, is it necessary? Surely it is inevitable that when tine dances on a “razor’s edge” one may fall off? One enters the sport fully aware of this and therefore the death of a driver is not so catastrophic as it seems. But we do make matters worse With Armco and one lethal rule in Formula One regulations. It is compulsory to carry a battery On board and when a crash comes, this acts as a detonator to the petrol fumes leading to a conflagration. Safety tanks etc. are futile when this lethal combination of petrol and energy from battery react. Further, the present-day GP car is on a very delicate equipoise. Something like Armco only makes matters worse when things get out of control the car only goes more out of control.
A more serious objection to the safety craze is that it is conducive to a lowering of standards, both of driving . less precise despite “technical improvement” and in the quality of circuits used, the non-use of classic tracks for Formula One races breaking the continuity with the early days.
The Yanks have a word for it “no nut is more dangerous than the nut behind the wheel” could we replace “race-track” for “nut” and we won’t be far from the truth?
Clandy, Co. Londonderry. P. G. Gormley
Cutler's first stand
Cutler's first (and only) stand Answering to the best of my ability the shoals of readers' queries which are sent to me, not you understand in competition with 'Honest John'…
Grand Prix notebook
Australia 1 Nico Rosberg Mercedes W05 1hr 32min 58.710sec 2 Kevin Magnussen McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes 1hr 33min 25.487sec 3 Jenson Button McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes 1hr 33min 28.737sec Fastest lap: Nico…
Forza Ferrari at Geneva Show
What the Geneva Motor Show lacked in novelties was more than compensated by the debut of the Ferrari GTO, resplendent in traditional scarlet on the Ferrari importer and Pininfarina stands.…