Stick to the rules

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Sir,

I must disagree with Simon Yates’ letter in last month’s Motor Sport. As he states, Grand Prix racing is a highly exciting sport, but it is also an extremely competitive one, necessitating stringent rules which should be adhered to completely.

If a car is fractionally too wide, as was Hunt’s McLaren at Jarama, then it should be disqualified. If cars are running with a fuel octane rating higher than is permitted by the rules, however marginal, then they should be disqualified. My answer to the McLaren team is that it is no good breaking a rule and then, once you are caught, saying that it is a ridiculous rule. If you can’t obey the rules, don’t enter the race. If the rules are considered impractical, then by all means possible get them changed, but keep within the regulations until they are amended.

I am surprised that octane testing is not done at all races, on all cars to be scrutineered after the race. Surely it is up to each individual team to ensure that their fuel does not exceed the limit before even contemplating entering a race!

James Hunt’s attitude towards these infringements does not promote public opinion of either himself or Grand Prix racing in the right direction, but whilst I am not a Hunt fan, I was disgusted to learn of his disqualification from the British Grand Prix results. I agree entirely that Hunt should never have been allowed to start the race if a full first lap was needed, but to allow him to start and then win the race in a “legal” car and rob him of his nine points afterwards, to me is not in the true spirit of Grand Prix racing. The governing body at Brands Hatch was entirely to blame, and in my opinion if the race was not run properly, as was found by the CSI Court of Appeal, all points should be made void.

No complaints about Motor Sport!

Huntingdon STEPHEN J. CRISWELL

Related articles

Related products