Matters of moment, November 1989

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Mansell’s misdemeanours

Nigel Mansell’s performances certainly enlivened the Portuguese Grand Prix. They are dealt with by our reporter on the spot but can be summarised as overshooting the Ferrari pit on a late stop for fresh Goodyears, using reverse gear to gain the pad instead of being pushed back, ignoring the black flag for this contravention ofthe race rules, and colliding with Senna in the leading McLaren-Honda. An impulsive charger, Mansell!

There are ironical twists to these unfortunate happenings. One might not associate pure racing cars with starters or reverse gears. However, they became compulsory for safety considerations in F1, giving drivers a chance to restart and clear the course should they stall their engines.

In fact, for some obscure reason, a reverse gear was always required on a racing car. Or so Ernest Eldridge discovered in 1924, when he lost the LSR because his 300 hp Fiat was not equipped for going backwards under its own power; Rene Thomas was after the record with the 101/2-litre Delage and put in a protest. Eldridge replied by taking his monster car into Paris, cobbling up a crude reverse gear, and returning to Arpajon, to beat Thomas with a (two-way) 146 mph – a flea-bite compared to today’s F1 speeds, but on those tyres, on that road, in that unwieldly motorcar …

If Mansell’s Ferrari had had no reverse gear, presumably he wouldn’t have been black flagged. Drivers have overshot their pits time and again, so let’s not be too hard on Nigel on that score!  Zborowski, for instance, incurred the wrath of an official for doing this in the 1924 French GP, admittedly in a virtually brakeless Miller, but he wasn’t black flagged.

Ironically again, the day before this was happening to Mansell, Willie Green was being shown the black flag at VSCC Donington, as it was thought the ERA was dropping oil. Even this meticulously correct driver did some laps before seeing the signal. It is important for safety reasons that the black flag is obeyed, but need it be shown to a driver who has committed merely a technical offence?

As for the prang that eliminated both Mansell and Senna, we will leave this to those who saw it, just recalling that in a perhaps less intense age of motor racing, the Brooklands’ rules called on a driver to be two clear lengths ahead before taking ground in front of an opponent.

More balls!

Last year we criticised the BBC for tending to favour ball garnes, to the detriment of TV viewers who watched mechanical sports: Although motor racing coverage is generally acceptable, this seems to be happening agairi.

The aforesaid actions of Mansell made the already intense Portuguese GP very exciting. So what did the BBC do? Having billed their commentary, in the Radio Times, to begin at 6 pm, they decided to go to Estoril some 20 minutes early, the Ryder Cup golf match having ended. So those tuning in at the advertised time missed seeing both Ferraris taking the lead.

Then, at a critical point in the race, it was back to The Belfry for the golfing prizepresentation and speeches. The team members were shown · individually and one American gentleman said that golf is the greatest of any sport in the world. A great game, yes, but does he and the BBC, realise that whereas the Ryder Cup attendance was 30,000, the Indianapolis 500 attracts 300,000 spectators, and what was the crowd figure for the British GP?

All this applauding and self-adulation by the Ryder cuppers occupied about 25 minutes. When the BBC did condescend to return us to Estoril, Senna was in the lead, but we did not know how. And as soon as the race was over it was immediately back to someone driving off – a golf ball!

Not even a shot of the winners of 1989’s most interesting race on the podium … It seems they never learn.

Years ago, when there was only the radio, the battle for the lead in an IoM motorcycle TT was absolutely thrilling, the commentary by Graham Walker, father of Murray. At the most crucial point, with the finish in sight, what happened? We were returned to the studio for “Woman’s Hour”.

They say that even housewives who had never ridden a bike rang up to complain. Now it seems to be more balls. WB

 

You may also like

Related products