Editorial, November 1998

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

The reason for the distinctly Ferrari flavour to this issue is simple enough. This year marks not only the tenth anniversary of the Old Man’s death, but also the centenary of his birth; milestones like that should not go unrecognised in a magazine such as this. I never met the man as, at the time that he died, my duties in motoring journalism had rather more to with filing press releases than filing stories on one of the most influential figures in the industry.

In one way at least, I’m pleased. Having no first-hand knowledge of the man means I can conveniently ignore the gently swelling body of opinion which, emboldened by the fact he’s no longer around to defend himself, finds it fashionable to say he was as poor a human being as he was a great race car constructor.

And even if Enzo did pitilessly set driver against driver, I wonder how far any race car constructor progressed by campaigning on the good bloke ticket. My guess is, had he taken a less authoritarian stance with his staff, I would not be typing these words now.

Besides, if he really was that difficult, why did so many drivers stay at Maranello even after their dreams had been realised and why did so many more spend a sizeable chunk of their careers banging on his door? It follows that, whatever the man’s failings, the package more than made up for it. Besides, those who suggest Ferrari’s attitude to the lives of his drivers bordered on the cavalier need to ask why he bothered to build such strength into his cars that the incidence of drivers being killed or injured by bona fide mechanical failure is so uncommonly small. Being a nice chap is all very well but, in racing, taking the trouble and inevitable penalties of making cars that keep their drivers alive is a rather more admirable quality.

Regulars may remember that, a couple of months back, I took exception to a Rover hatchback doing the rounds with BRM badges glued to its sides. My point was that I thought it a shame that one of the great names from our heritage had been press-ganged into flogging mass-produced shopping cars. When, inevitably, the people from Rover called, it was not, to their credit, to accuse me of living on a planet removed from the commercial realities of the real world but, instead, to offer me one of these Rover-BRMs to stooge around in for a few days. I now report as follows: the Rover-BRM offers engaging transport, confident handling and fine performance; the outside looks great, the interior simply terrible. It’s a good car and an enjoyable one too. And it still doesn’t deserve to wear a BRM badge any more than I do.

While on BRM-related matters, I would like to recognise formally the lengths to which the V16s that were slated to race at the Goodwood Revival went to honour fully the racing heritage of the breed. If you were there for the race you will have seen one complete a couple of laps before retiring and the second fail magnificently even to reach the first comer. The real praise for fully entering into the spirit of the occasion, however, must be reserved for Nick Mason’s entry. The masterstroke of his V16 was to fail even to make it as far as the circuit. Quite brought a tear to my eye.

Related articles

Related products