Letters from readers, November 2000

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Franco Lombardi writes

Sir,

May I please correct the errors of fact and impression in the Matters of Moment piece about me in your September issue.

1. I am not lying in an Italian jail as your piece suggests. The sentence was imposed after only a short summary procedure, and is effectively in suspense pending the full hearing of the case on appeal. I have every confidence that the higher court will reverse the sentence when the full facts are heard.

2. The court which heard this case could not and did not pass any judgement on whether either of Mr Favero’s cars was genuine. However, you should know that the President of the Italian Automobile Historic Federation declared to the Secretary of FIVA, by a letter dated 20 April 1994 and which has never been revoked, that Mr Favero’s 375 Plus machine must be considered false and that no FIVA passport should be issued for it.

3. Under Italian law (and I would have hoped among all fair-minded people), I am entitled to the presumption of innocence, meaning that I should not be considered or described as guilty of an offence before a final verdict. The motoring magazines in Italy have understood this, and if you had contacted me or researched your piece more thoroughly, I am confident that you also would have respected this important presumption.

I am yours, etc, Franco Lombardi, Genova, Italy

FIVA’S Technical chief writes

Sir,

FIVA cannot leave unanswered the article under the headline `FIVA Representative Jailed for Extortion’ (October issue). The information published is incorrect in certain aspects: Professor Franco Lombardi is not, and has never been, a FIVA representative responsible for authenticating car identities. In 1993, Professor Lombardi (then Vice President of the Italian Ferrari Club) was entrusted by ASI, the Italian historic vehicle body, to investigate the authenticity of a particular car stated to be Ferrari 375 Plus, the 0386 AM. Agreement was reached that such investigation be carried out in addition, on behalf of FIVA.

His investigations were contained in a documented report that was approved by ASI, and subsequendy by FIVA, as a result of which the car was recognised as being a modem copy incorporating some original parts obtained from various sources, built up around a chassis of recent construction.

The Italian court did not rule on the authenticity of that car (or others), as this was not the purpose of the trial.

I am yours, etc, Derek Drummond Bonzom, Chairman, FIVA, Technical Commision

Laps of concentration

Sir,

Your ‘Magic of Indianapolis’ words and pictures (October issue) carried me back to the 1966 Indy 500. I was 14 and a rabid Jim Clark fan — an anomaly for a Chicago boy. My dad taught me the excitement of Formula One and took me to Indy in ’64 when they had the big MacDonald/ Sachs fireball (I can still feel the heat) and Clark’s suspension broke when he was leading. I saw Clark win in ’65 and so ’66 was my third race. We sat over Turn One and, as any good fan, I had my scorecard to keep track of the race, and earnestly recorded the leaders’ progress over 200 laps. How better for a boy to follow his hero?

As is well recorded, Clark had handling problems with the STP Lotus 38 and spun several times. He was still leading by lap 160, however, and looked to be on his way to a repeat drink of Hoosier milk.

If you look it up, you will find that Clark’s teammate that year was George Snider in an identical STP Lotus, except only Clark’s had white-wall tyres on the inside track. I think Snider’s number was 39; Clark’s was 19. In those days, each car in the 500 had a USAC steward assigned to record its progress. They sat/stood in the control tower in the centre of pitlane and ticked off the laps.

On lap 168, I think — I wish I still had that scorecard! — an STP Lotus crashed at Turn Four The track announcer boomed, “And it’s Jimmy Clark into the wall!” From my seat at Turn One, I put my binoculars on Turn Four and saw an STPred Lotus sliding to a halt; but seconds later, Clark’s white-walled 19 appeared. I kept recording the laps and was as astonished as Team Lotus to find Victory Lane occupied by Graham Hill.

What happened? I am convinced that, when Snider hit the wall, the steward tracking Clark, upon hearing the PA announcement, and knowing Jimmy had already spun several times, momentarily looked away thinking his working day was over. Clark, meanwhile, slipped past and, before the steward realised, that lap was missed!

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

I am yours, etc, George Del Canto, Walton-On-Thames, Surrey

Not the percentage game

Sir,

I wonder if I am alone in thinking that Joe Scalzo’s splendid story (Stars and Gripes, October issue) sat uncomfortably with Adam Cooper’s article about Jochen Rindt’s last days?

Joe’s writing is always colourful and he is clearly correct in saying that the US constructors unleashed experimental cars whose handling miseries were almost beyond comparison. Correct but incomplete, I suggest, because Colin Chapman also returned with the Lotus 56, in which Mike Spence died, and the Lotus 64, whose imperfect build proved nearly fatal to Andretti. The flaws in the Lotus 72 were similar.

The simple fact is that the period Joe describes was one of the most innovative of the past 50 years and it seems most designers were on the boundary where their design aims exceeded their technical knowledge and capability.

Today’s racing cars are thankfully much safer, but somewhere along the way we’ve lost the adventurousness. Nowadays we read press releases in which a one per cent design change is deemed to be ‘radical’.

I am yours, etc, Wyn Edwards, Quedgeley, Gloucs

Dundrod’s founding Fathers

Sir,

I read with some interest Paul Fearnley’s Track Test of Dundrod (October issue). The article brought back many memories of the era of motorsport in which I grew up in Northern Ireland. However, in the interests of accuracy one other name should be added to the list of “movers and shakers” who made it all happen. JW Haughton was the Chairman of the Ulster Automobile Club and an influential figure in the business community during that period. PB (Pat) Webb was the Chairman of the Antrim County Council who had the political ambition for the Dundrod project that helped it through local government channels. The missing name is that of my father, Gordon Neill, who was the Honorary

Secretary of the Ulster Automobile Club at that time and the Clerk of the Course for all the motor car races that took place on the Dundrod circuit. He was the man who supplied the sporting influence, had control over the whole project, and made it happen.

He was the man who also had to take the flak when it all went wrong!

I am sure that all those who worked with my father during that exciting period of motorsport in Northern Ireland would acknowledge that his name should be mentioned in any article on the Dundrod racing circuit.

I am yours, etc, Malcolm Neill, Reading, Berks

You may also like

Related products