This seasons F1 Aero tricks

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Battling rule-makers as well as rivals, F1 teams are as inventive as ever; you just can’t always see it

Colin Chapman, who always sought ‘the next big thing’, would have hated today’s rule-bound racing, where every clever idea seems to be rapidly stamped on. But the biggest genie escaped from the bottle on his watch – the invisible art of aero-management. Since wings arrived in Formula 1 drag has become secondary to the great god downforce. Hub-mounted wings, suction fans, skirts and active suspension have all flowered – and been snuffed out to stifle soaring cornering speeds.

It’s cat-and-mouse. Write a new rule and by tomorrow someone will have stretched it. Take the underfloor plank, introduced to enforce a flat bottom and slash ground effect. Designers soon realised that while the plank had to be there, there didn’t have to be any car above the front of it. Cue the high-arching nose exposing the top of the plank, which can be modified by a splitter to offer significant downforce and steer air smoothly under the sidepods. Separating the nose from the wing also freed more wing area (now cancelled by a standard aero-neutral wing centre). More topically, that cut-away above the splitter could allow the plank to flex; sounds a bad thing, but to designers it’s another tempting chink in the rules.

All downforce also induces drag, but the closer you get to the track the better the deal – a lot of extra downforce for little extra resistance. That’s why the rules have lifted the car floor and the front wings. But it’s hard to measure ground clearances at 160mph; if your wing sags under load, you’re into a win-win area. Cue wing stiffness tests to prevent this. So next, teams want to drop the car nose – but the splitter gets in the way, and if you grind down the plank you’ll invoke penalties. But suppose the splitter deflects up when it impacts the track? You get a low front wing, increased suction under the plank, less wear, and the car can ride kerbs harder. This is the ‘flexi-floor’ which teams exploited notably in 2007. Some built in controlled flex; Ferrari actually hinged the splitter at the rear, with a spring strut for adjustability. The FIA brought in deflection tests; designers stiffened the vertical splitter stay so the deflection point was just above the test load. At Monza this year the test load was for the first time applied off-centre. Cat and mouse…

This year we’ve had much talk about the front wing of Red Bull’s rapid RB6. While it resisted static test loads it did seem to run very low at speed. After calls for clarification the test loads were doubled – and the RB6 again passed, as did Ferrari’s F10, accused of the same thing. One theory is that clever carbon-fibre layering lets the wing flex in a non-linear way, deflection rising rapidly after the test point. When everyone has sussed it, there will be a new rule…

As there is over the ‘F-duct’. McLaren’s ingenious speed booster breaks no written rules, but will be proscribed for 2011. However, it’s worth discussing because its core principle – the ‘blown’ wing – is not being banned. F1 rear wings have two sections, of which the upper ‘flap’ magnifies the downforce from the lower. Three-element wings are better but now banned; however the aero industry has long used the ‘blown flap’ principle, which pipes extra air out through slots in the wing, boosting its effect – a ‘virtual’ third wing section made of air.

But a stronger wing brings more drag, and even today’s smaller wings haul a vast bubble of messy air behind them. If you can disrupt the flow pattern when you don’t need all the downforce the flap will stall, losing effectiveness but crucially also cutting drag. Movable aero devices are illegal, but if you can make a flap of air, can you make a movable ‘switch’ of air too?

That’s what McLaren achieved with the so-called F-duct. Air ducted from the overhead intake normally exits below the wing, taking the easier route at an internal fork, but also feeding some forward via a cockpit duct to spill from an opening by the driver’s knee. When he closes the opening using his knee (later a hand) the blocked air diverts flow into the other arm of the fork and out through slots in the upper flap, stalling the wing and giving 4-5 extra mph on demand. McLaren’s forward snorkel inlet boosts the effect. It’s driver-controlled – but no ‘device’ exists.

This idea was rapidly emulated in various ways, though it took some teams half the season to catch up. Most relied on a hand to close the duct, but in the end the teams agreed it was not cricket. So driver control is out, but blown wings remain, some fed by small front openings in the wing, others by ducts through the shark fin (which straightens air flow and gives more consistent downforce), fed from the main air intake or extra flank openings. Now there is some talk of automatic F-ducts, which would choke an internal duct over certain speeds to divert the flow.

A similar principle has resurfaced within the diffuser, which extracts air from underneath. But there’s another source of fast-moving gas – engine exhaust. Today’s rules ban body projections such as bargeboards and exhaust ‘chimneys’, pushing designers to smooth and slim the rear bodywork and move exhaust outlets down low. It is possible to feed the exhaust directly under the diffuser to radically boost ground effect, but lifting off the throttle cuts this suddenly, unsettling the car, which is why this went out of favour in the ’90s. Williams and Mercedes have revived the idea by guiding the exhaust under an open-fronted diffuser, a less critical method, but most teams are blowing over the diffuser and through the suspension This smooths out the draggy wake of the big rear wheels and extracts more air from the diffuser – if you can defend components against the furnace heat. Some teams have had to redesign suspension mounts to keep them clear. Every change you make affects something else; an F1 team’s job is a constant trading of benefits.

Same with the rules. Safety vs spectacle; speed vs cost; designer vs law enforcer. The ‘next big things’ get smaller, but they’re no less crucial.

With thanks to the Lola Design Office for their consultation. For more information on Lola click on to www.lola-group.com

Related articles

Related products