THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN

Sir,

In your September issue ” Police Officer ” quite rightly suggests that both sides of an affair should be published, but he, of course, argues only one side. Let me give you the other. “Disillusioned Motorist ” exceeded the speed limit by xo m.p.h.,

for which he was fined k4. The Daily T’elegraph, on September . znd, reported a case m which a motorcyclist approached a pedes

trian crossing. As he did so, a woman (only a woman “) started to cross. Rather than stop he Charged the woman, hit her and knocked her down. Upon conviction he was fined 6os. Sixty shillings! He was a policeman.

The same journal reports a case in which it is alleged that a motorist who was suspected by the police of committing a motoring offence (of which the Court subsequently acquitted him) was beaten up by them. At any rate, a doctor certified that he suffered two black eyes, multiple bruisings and a broken nose. The police carefully explained that the man fell over” in the police station. Some fall!

An inquiry is very. rightly being held into the police behaviour in this case. Who is conducting the inquiry ? Why, Sir, none other than the police themselves, although it is an established principle of English Law that no Man shall be judge in his own case. I fancy that I could accurately forecast the outcome of the ” inquiry.” Since I do not wish to incur two black eyes, a broken nose, etc., through ” falling over,” I must ask you, Sir, to be so good as to allow me to sign myself,

” Alsionum DISILLUSIONED MOTOIUST.” [Name and address supplied.—Eo.]