FORD SIERRA

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

FORD SIERRA

THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CAR AT THE

CONVENTIONAL running-gear is (lathed different body-shell.

A COMMON complaint today is that most mass-produced European cars tend to look the same. Ford, however, cannot be criticised for producing a “Eurobox” in the Sierra. The replacement to the ubiquitous Cortina i Taunus — more than 10 million built since its introduction in 1962 — is very different in terms of styling. For a major manufacturer such as Ford it represents a bold step, the rounded body styling being more appropriate to a small quantity, specialist builder. Certainly, the Sierra outline is an acquired taste. Having seen examples in the metal I can say it is more attractive than photographs would have one believe, but there again, like many of my Standard House colleagues, I feel the styling from the front is reminiscent of the Panhard-Levassor. From the rear the may boot is very much a family link with the current Escort.

The Sierra shape has its roots in the Probe III design exercise, a “concept” first seen at the 1981 Frankfurt Show. The outline has changed since then, but the resemblance is still there. Whether the fleet buyers — the major factor in the success or failure of the Sierra — take to the shape remains to be seen. For my money they will, but such a bold design is bound to meet with a certain amount of resistance from private and fleet buyer alike, although projected low maintenance costs will undoubtedly sway the latter.

Underneath the skin are a number of developments and innovations aimed at more economical motoring without sacrificing performance. With some justification Ford make play of the fact that its engineers have gone to great lengths to ensure that more efficiency is attained not only by an obviously aerodynamic shape, but by subtle improvements to vvell-proven components as well

as a major effort to keep overall weight as low as practicable. Ford claim the Sierra has a 0.34 drag co-efficient, a 22 per cent improvement on other European family cars; the top of the range sporting XR4 with its 2.8-litre fuel injected V6 has a 0.32 co-efficient thanks to its additional aerodynamic devices, including a rather weird bi-plane rear spoiler. Add to this a minimum kerb weight of 2,136 lbs., less than a Vauxhall Cavalier but more than VW Passat, and one appreciates why Ford is crowing about efficiency on the Sierra. Incidentally, the XR4, with a claimed 125 m.p.h. top speed, will not be available until spring of 1983. The low weight has been achieved by a reduction in steel gauge in certain areas, plus the use of high strength, low alloy metal for body panels, including the rear floor crossmember. There has been a significant reduction in the number of steel body panels, the Sierra having a one piece outer side panel compared with the eight of the old Cortina. There has also been a 26.5 lbs weight saving in the rear suspension alone when compared with the Granada, the Sierra using basically the same independent send-trailing arm system. The difference comes from the use of what Ford prosaically describes as an “upswept over aide” tubular crossmember which not only carries the suspension system, but also the aluminium alloy final-drive housing. There are seven engine options on the Sierra, starting with the 1,294 c.c. four cylinder o.h.c. engine and ending with the 2,792 c.c. fuel injected V6. Apart from the petrol-driven 1.3-litre and 1.6-litre o.h.c. engines, there is also an economy version of the latter, plus a 2-litre o.h.c. four, a 2.3-litre V6 and a Peugeot-built four-cylinder diesel from the Granada, now enlarged to 2.3-litres from 2.1. This wide

diversity was a major influence in Ford’s decision that the Sierra should be front-engined, rear-wheel drive, as it was felt the limitations on engine options imposed by front-wheel drive would lessen overall appeal.

Although all these engines are familiar, worthwhile improvements have been incorporated, particularly on the under 2-litre assemblies. Again efficiency is the theme, and both 1.3 and 1.6-litre engines have recontoured pistons, a smaller piston-bore contact area resulting in less friction. The two top compression rings are also narrower, but surprisingly, it was discovered that the oil ring had no significant effect on friction, and it was therefore left unchanged. A bonus to these modifications is a lighter, shorter piston which helps reduce engine vibrations. All the o.h.c. engines have dual oudet exhaust manifolds, these tuned systems contributing to a two per cent power increase and three per cent improvement in torque.

Apart from the 1.6 Economy, all Sierra engines have breakerless transistorised ignition, first used by Ford in 1969 on the Cortina V6. As far as the economy engine is concerned, it has a computerised ignition system which uses a microprocesser to replace the vacuum mechanical distributor spark and retard. This monitors engine performance continuously, and is claimed to be more accurate and efficient.

With its higher fmal drive ratio (3.14:1 compared with 3.62:1 for the ordinary 1.6 Sierra) the Economy model is said to return 47.8 m.p.g. at a constant 56 m.p.h. (44.8 m.p.g. for the normal 1.6) in four-speed gearbox form. It should be added that both 1.6-litre engines produce 75 blip. (DIN) at 5,300 r.p.m. There is a five-speed gearbox option for all models except the 1.3-litre whilst both the XR4

and diesel have it as standard. It is derived from the much praised Ford four-speed ‘box, the overdrive fifth gear installed in the tailshaft housing on an extended gear cluster. Ford C3 automatic transmission is available on 1.6, 2.0 and 2.3-live models, whilst power steering is optional on the 2.0 o.h.c. and V6 Sierras, and standard on diesel versions.

Internally the Sierra not only feels bigger than the Cortina, but acnially is. Front and rear leg room has been increased whilst the basic luggage compartment is six per cent larger at 14.4 cu. ft. Thanks to a rear seat that can be split and folded forward, the carrying capacity can be increased up to a maximum of 42.2 cu. ft. on the saloons. The Sierra is also available as 1.6, 2.0, 2.3 V6 and Diesel Estates.

A pleasing and well thought out interior features newly designed seating, the front reclining seats on the upper models having built-in head restraints. On some models the drivers’ seat can be adjusted for height as well as lumbar support.

As usual with Ford there are a wide range of trim levels starting with die straight Sierra and running through L, GL, Ghia why do they still insist on those mock weed door strips and awful cheap badges? to the top of the range XR4. The amount of instrumentation and gadgetry also depends on what model you purchase, the basic curved instrument panel in my opinion being rather cluttered and confused on the 2.3 Ghia.

Certainly the Sierra looks and feels much more than a Cortina, the overall impression being of a Ford which is now much closer to a Granada in terms of trim, ride, and spaciousness. These facts alone will make the Sierra appeal to many many people. M.R.G.

You may also like

Related products