Sorting Out The Anzani Twin-Cam Engines

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

We have received the following communication from Barry Peerless about Anzani twin-cam engines, which have been the subject of speculation in recent issues of MOTOR SPORT, We thank Mr Peerless for clearing up the points involved. W B

Re your article in the August Motor Sport on the R1 Anzani engined Frazer Nash, the following may be of interest. Firstly, The R1 (Ross No 1) was not a supercharged engine as designed and first produced. R1 was the original designation, which became R1A following development. The Squire supercharging development did not change the designation.

Designed in 1932 by Douglas Ross, it used the bottom half of the single o h c engine that had been made for and used in Archie Frazer-Nash’s “Slug”, Anzani intended sales to be to A F N and a letter from Ross in 1933 confirms this, but also states that different engine bearer-arms would be required. This is true: although seven such installations have been made without this modification they are a compromise rather than an engineering solution. The problem of modification is that the bearer-arms are cast as an integral part of the crankcase, as were those on the side-valve engines for A C, Horstmann and others, whereas Frazer Nash used a boll-on bearer which would have required extensive modification to the R1 crankcase patterns. Without firm orders from A F N this was never funded. In fact it was not until 1936, four years after the the engine had been announced that A F N tentatively declared themselves satisfied with it and offered the installation in their new Ulster 100 Frazer Nash, only one of which was made and, in fact, sold to a customer with a 4ED Meadows installed instead.

The Frazer Nash in your article, CML 208, was owned by a Miss Worthington of South Farnborough. When and where the installation was carried out is unknown to me. During the war the car was spotted by the side of the road in Battersea in a derelict state with a badly frost-cracked block. Later on the engine appeared in Frazer Nash AYH 33, a car known for some time as “The Slug”, which it patently wasn’t. I bought the engine from Ian Smith, the owner of AYH 33, when he installed an AC six engine in 1963/4.

The second Frazer Nash with an R1 was BMC 446, fitted by Peter Douglas-Osbourn. This engine later found its way into AMF 447, owned by Carmichael in Scotland, and it was from him that I bought this one also.

The third Frazer Nash was, and is, AMD 26. Bought new in 1933 by then Sub Lt Duff in, he had tried unsuccessfully to buy the car with an R1 installed by A F N but eventually separately bought their development engine and had it fitted by Whitfield Sernmence in 1938. This was the engine that had been fitted to the Ulster 100 in 1936 (FMC 120).

Of the two engines that I bought, well, they are a bit mixed up now as I have retained parts of both which went together to build one engine which is now fitted to my Frazer Nash Ulster 1, HX 3535, supercharged with p No 9 Cozette. The surplus engine has been sold to a Squire owner as spares. An interesting point about this installation is that at the same time as I bought the ex-Worthington engine from lan Smith, he included an unused front timing-case for skew gears driving a vertical Cozette supercharger from the crankshaft. As far as I know, this is a one-off by Anzani, not surprisingly unused as the skew gears are driven without bearing support on a 4in overhang from the front main bearing — which is not the way to treat skew gears! Nevertheless, it is part of the installation in my car as the configuration is the same as on the supercharged side-valve Anzani originally fitted, and it is a shame not to use it.

So, we have seven Frazer Nashes having been fitted with three R1 engines:

(Engine 1) CML 208 and AYH 33

(Engine 2) BMC 446. AMF 447 and HX 3535

(Engine 3) FMC 120 and AMD 26

None of these engines have engine numbers. Bob King in Victoria, Australia, has, as you say, a similar engine, no R1 62, in his Type 35 Bugatti. It was installed in 1938 by Lyndon Duckett, who believed it to be the last of 12 made. It is now supercharged with a bevel-driven vertical No 8 Cozette. D M R Adams installed another in his Type 37 Bugatti YU 2200; his has now been replaced by the correct unit, but where the Anzani went to I don’t know.

A quite comprehensive research was made into these engines by Johnathan Wood for Thoroughbred and Classic Cars between October and December 1974 for his articles on the Squire and this is well worth referring to.

Much more could be written about the small differences in the engineering of the pre-Squire engines, but basically they never had the development that was needed. Incidentally, whereas the Frazer Nash ‘Gough’ engine developed 56hp on 8.1 compression, the R1 developed 66hp on 7.71, both unsupercharged of course, so it would have been worth putting some development money into it before Squire came along. With the David Brown blower installation by Squire, 110hp was obtained at 10Ib pressure. Bob King is getting 120hp with 61b, and it would be interesting to know what Roy Palmer is getting with his Squire. It won’t be less than these. B P