Q & A

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Jamal Hameedi Ford GT project manager

How was a road car built on a race-team schedule?

1) Upfront analysis: the programme was built on the premise that every engineer would engineer their parts correctly first time out.

2) Most of the team had racing backgrounds, so we were not intimidated by a four-year job in 24 months.

3) Huge reliance on computer engineering. In some cases we didn’t make prototypes before we tooled the part for production. Unheard of in production cars.

4) Everyone sat in the same room, so everything was being engineered in the same place and in real time.

How much of a risk was it to use new processes?

Our experts analysed which new techniques we could execute with high confidence. We used our aerospace experience in advanced aluminum welding and corporate-wide experience with superplastic-formed body panels. Those panels were crucial we could not have maintained the voluptuous lines of the GT with traditional stamped technology.

Why a spaceframe and not a monocoque?

We chose extruded-aluminum/cast-node spaceframe architecture for several reasons: quicker to tool stage than a monocoque: low tooling cost: superior stiffness-to-weight ratio than a unibody: and greater flexibility for future spin-offs.

Why an aluminium frame and not composites?

A composite frame would be more expensive. While ours is a prestige supercar. composite construction drives costs high (for example: £222,000-plus for Enzo. Carrera GT and SLR). We were not in that price range, nor that volume range worldwide.

Will much of this project feed back into production? We are currently doing a deep retrospective review of the Ford GT programme and collecting lessons learned. We plan to seed the processes that worked well into Ford mainstream product development. We are also looking at using some components developed on this car in other high-performance models.

What is the rationale behind such an intensive and expensive project prestige or profit? strong>

The GT shows the world that Ford has the engineers. the technology, and the passion to make a class-leading car first time out in a market that we have never participated in and that’s quite an achievement. But we do not plan on losing money with this car.

The team all appear to be real enthusiasts. Was it a volunteer group?

Yes we all eat. breathe and live cars! We all stepped forward and said. “We want to work on this programme”. We had lots of applicants for a small number of places, and everyone made a two-year commitment. Programmes like this (just like racing programmes) are a lifestyle commitment and that’s not for everyone.

Might there be a lighter, stripped version, like Porsche’s ClubSport models?

That would be excellent! Lighter is always better. But we don’t have any plans yet to do a lightweight car. It’s something that we might look at in the future.

Does the car have a racing future? If it had, what would need changing?

We talk about it all the time, but we have no official racing plans at this time. The primary area to address would be the supercharged engine: it doesn’t fit well in any of the current regulations.