Letters: October 2018

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Current page

197

Current page

198

F1’s engine struggles

Having recently become aware that 2021’s fabulous new Formula 1 engine rules are no longer, it seems to me that Mark Hughes is right – the manufacturers have too much say in what is going to happen, so Liberty and the FIA need to come to terms with the need to have independent rules created to foster improved competition.

The way to achieve that is to have an F1 engine class for the independents and another for manufacturers. That way the latter can no longer hold the FIA and race promoters to ransom. Being able to supply engines to everyone that wants to take part is a pre-requisite for good competition.

Just a thought.

Gerard Sauer, Worthing, West Sussex

Ferrari in a tangle

I read with interest John Watson’s 1975 British Grand Prix recollections, as at the time I ran Alan Jones in the Embassy Hill Racing Hill GH1.

As I remember, the start of the race was dry, then it rained, then it dried out and then it poured. Tony Brise crashed one of our cars in the rain, but Alan was right in the thick of it.

As we were preparing to bring Alan in during the deluge, the next team along the pit road was Ferrari. They were experienced in pit stops from their sports car racing and had pneumatic wheel guns connected to the air bottles by those curly extendable yellow plastic air hoses. Clay Regazzoni came in and the bloke on the left front undid the nut with his airgun, removed the slick-shod wheel, fitted the wet, turned to pick up his gun and did the nut up, but did not manage to get around the front of the car before the team manager signalled Regga to go. The Ferrari had a high airbox in those days and the air-line was still across the front of the car. The yellow hose snagged the bodywork below the opening of the airbox, started to uncurl and got really long before snapping the wheel gun out of the mechanic’s hands and whipping it in a big arc until it hit the pit wall. Crews around the Ferrari pit hit the ground as this heavy projectile was winding up, knowing that it would soon be propelled at them.

While we were waiting for Alan, Niki Lauda appeared in the other Ferrari – and the team was by now in total disarray as it set about servicing Niki’s car. The left-front guy, now with another wrench, undid the large nut, removed and replaced the wheels, put the nut on by hand, then turned to pick up his gun as the team manager signalled Niki to go. He moved about two feet before the nut dropped off its thread and rolled slowly to my feet…

Steve Roby, via email

In defence of Lewis

David Buckden (Letters, September 2018) appears to be an enthusiast of long standing, but prejudice seems to be getting in the way of sound judgment. Lewis Hamilton wears his emotions on his sleeve more than some – which endears him to me far more than corporate blandness – and his “behaviour” after the British GP was surely down to his absolute emotional and physical exhaustion after a rollercoaster race. 

Lewis Hamilton has proven time after time that he is pre-eminent in his generation for his speed, determination, exceptional hand-to-eye coordination, ability to master the complexities of modern F1 machinery and sheer will to win. He most certainly did not have success presented to him on a plate. He caught Ron Dennis’s eye at an early age, with his exceptional karting ability, but he had to go on proving his class through the junior formulae, and he delivered immediately when he got his hands on an F1 car in 2007. 

The greatest drivers of each generation rarely had to plug around in uncompetitive machinery for long: Nuvolari, Rosemeyer, Fangio (once he was backed to come to Europe), Clark, Stewart, Prost, Senna, Schumacher – they are no different. Lewis Hamilton’s ‘lifestyle’ may not be to everyone’s taste. So what? His focus on racing denied him much in his youth and he can now afford his showbiz inclinations, which have not affected his racing up to now..

Chris Mason, York

Not now Bernhard

I very much enjoyed Dickie Meaden’s article on Timo Bernhard’s extraordinary exploits at the Nürburgring in the equally extraordinary Porsche 919 Evo. But I must take exception to your description of the machine as a “racing car”. It is not eligible or sanctioned for any series in the world, though I suppose it could run at Pikes Peak.

It may be – indeed is – an amazing feat of engineering prowess (one expects no less from Weissach), but you cannot compare it, or Bernhard’s feat, to Stefan Bellof’s achievement in the Porsche 956.

Eliot Wilson, Sunderland

Orders aren’t racing

The recent German Grand Prix was hailed by some scribes as F1 at its best, yet for me it was another farcical episode. After being an avid fan for nearly 40 years, I’ve had enough of what is now a ludicrous ‘sport’.

Lewis Hamilton was clearly in breach of the regulations with his pit entry shenanigans, but escaped penalty. Why? Rules are rules and a poor understanding is not an excuse. It was like a police patrol saying, ‘Oh you didn’t realise you were speeding, very well then, off you go, have a nice day.’

Kimi Räikkönen was holding up Sebastian Vettel, so Kimi was asked to move aside. This is not racing that we pay to enjoy. If Vettel found himself behind his slower team-mate then it’s a strategic error! This era of subservient team-mates is not racing, it’s manipulation of the outcome to favour one driver. In 2010 Alonso lost the championship in the final event because he couldn’t get past Vitaly Petrov and paid the ultimate price for a poor strategic decision, yet ‘gifting’ your team-mates positions can win titles…

In the closing stages, and on fresher tyres, Valtteri Bottas was catching Hamilton hand over fist but was denied the opportunity to race. Again, manipulation of the outcome to favour one driver, gifting him a victory he should have already been denied by breaking the rules with his pit entry mistake.

Christophe Ellis, Australia

Don’t forget Leyland

Among the many anniversaries that seem to have cropped up this year, one which has slipped through the net (perhaps intentionally) is the formation of the British Leyland Motor Corporation, which offered so much promise in 1968 when BMC and Leyland Motors united. 

I joined the company’s Bathgate plant straight from school in 1973. If anybody had suggested then that, within my lifetime, there would be no British Leyland and we would buy cars made in Korea, we would have had a right good laugh at that. 

I have just bought Mrs McRae a Kia Picanto…

Ian McRae, Gartcosh, North Lanarkshire

Shell suits

About 10 years ago you published a Parting Shot from the 1969 Spa 1000 Kms, with an MGB clearly visible in last place. This six-year-old car had just been driven from Bucks to Spa under its own steam. Owners Charlie Dawkins and Rod Eade practised and then completed the race at a remarkable 101mph average. They had needed only a single set of tyres. The Shell representative caught the spirit of their efforts and gladly refuelled the car at his company’s expense for the run back to Bucks. This was surely amateur motor sport at its best.

John Bilton, Salisbury, Wilts.

McLaren’s Medicine

I’ve used motor sport to illustrate concepts for pharmaceutical development in conference presentations and university lectures, and Mark Hughes’ analysis of McLaren’s problems provided a stunning example of how company culture can cripple innovation.  

Departmental silos promote ‘cover your ass’ thinking, which prevents teams from focusing on true goals, whether they are constructing a winning car or developing an effective cancer drug. In both cases it’s managing the people, not the technology, that present the greatest challenges and opportunities for success.

Thanks for another great article – I’ll be describing it to my colleagues..

Mark Moody, Concord, USA


Write to: Motor Sport, 18-20 Rosemont Road, London NW3 6NE or e-mail by TAPPING HEREPlease include your full name and address when corresponding.

You may also like

Related products