Racing lines with Dickie Meaden

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Current page

197

Current page

198

Current page

199

Current page

200

Current page

201

Historic cars may slide, but standards shouldn’t

After the furore surrounding Sebastian Vettel’s wheel-banging hissy-fit with Lewis Hamilton in Baku, driving standards (or their absence) have been a hot topic of conversation among the wider racing community. Apart from the very occasional blip, it’s rarely a cause for concern in historics. 

Some of this can undoubtedly be put down to drivers doing it for pleasure, rather than fighting for their careers or a place in the history books. But with its increasing profile and growing competitiveness, the good conduct of drivers in historic motor sport is due to more than the rather misplaced notion of a passive ‘after you’ attitude. That most cars are raced by their owners is, I believe, a big factor. It means they’re raced hard, but tend not to be driven like they’re stolen. It’s an attitude mirrored by those in the fortunate position of sharing drives with some of these owners, myself included. Unlike modern motor sport, where the cars are closer to tools of the trade, historic cars are treasures to be enjoyed and cherished. 

Maturity plays its part, too. If you’re successful enough to buy a few nice old cars and take them racing, the chances are you might be sporting the odd grey hair. Not that middle age is necessarily an indication of increased maturity (far from it, in my case), but there’s a reason why you don’t see colossal first corner pile-ups in the style of a Clio Cup or Ginetta Junior race. 

Then there’s the small matter of safety. Mercifully, old racing cars aren’t the fiery death traps they once were – and thanks to improved roll cage design they don’t fold up quite so readily, either. Still, strapping yourself into an old racing car comes with the tacit acknowledgement that you’re more likely to hurt yourself if you have the Big One. Unsurprisingly this tends to foster a collective sense of self-preservation and a desire to stay out of the barriers.  

Funnily enough, while everyone outside the paddock tends to fixate on the sky-rocketing values of classic cars, I don’t think the price tags attached to historic racers are as big a factor as you might expect. A Ferrari 250 SWB might be worth £10m, but should the worst happen it doesn’t cost anywhere near that much to mend. Not that I’d want to foot the bill for fixing a stoved-in tail or bent nose, but crashing an old racing car is not like dropping a Ming vase or Fabergé egg. 

Which brings me neatly onto one of the smarter methods employed by race organisers to ensure we all play nicely. It’s long been the case at Peter Auto meetings that, in the event of a coming-together where one driver is clearly at fault, the culprit is expected to pay for half the cost of repairing the car he or she hit. 

It’s a very grown-up and civilised solution – and Patrick Peter reminds his drivers about it at the start of every race weekend. It’s not a legally binding agreement – it’s more of a metaphorical handshake deal – but if you cause an accident and don’t cough up it’ll likely be the last time you participate in one of Patrick’s events. As his are among the best on the historic racing calendar, it’s a very effective deterrent.

Some races are worse than others. Predictably it’s the touring car races that can be a bit ‘elbows out’, but even this is more due to the parity of the cars than any wish to shove your rival off the track. The Spa Six Hours is another one that’s pretty hairy, but much of that is down to the sheer number of cars on track (the grid starts halfway down the hill towards Eau Rouge and snakes back beyond the Bus Stop!) and the speed differential between the pace-setting GT40s and the tail-enders. There’s also the fickle Ardennes weather and the challenge of racing at dusk and into darkness. Its reputation as the toughest event in historic circuit racing is well deserved.

The mix of drivers has been shifting for years in historics. Where once there was a clear majority of resolutely amateur racers – the gentlemen drivers for which the sport is renowned – there’s now a growing band of professionals, from retired stars who do it for (serious) fun, to younger ones for whom historics offer an additional revenue stream. It’s this influx of talent and experience that has brought greater racecraft and a more dynamic spectacle. And yes, the racing is harder, but believe me this has led the rest of us
to raise our games.

Throw in the super-quick owners (of which there are many) and the hugely experienced preparers such as Martin Stretton, Simon Hadfield and Gary Pearson and you have die-hard historic racers who are every bit as quick as your Sopers, Pirros and Kristensens. That’s an awful lot of talent at the pointy end of the grids, but still the racing remains clean.  

Unlike modern racing, if there are collisions its rarely when dicing for position. Rather it’s almost always when faster cars are lapping slower traffic. Ask the overtaking drivers and they’ll point the finger at the drivers of slower cars for misjudging the closing speeds or simply not paying attention to their mirrors. I’m inclined to concur, but having raced fast and slow cars I’m obliged to point out it can also be because the driver of the quicker car has made an impatient or imprudent lunge. Overtaking is always a shared responsibility,
and one that historic racers tend to take seriously.

The circuit with the most to lose from bad or dangerous driving – and therefore the one that places the greatest emphasis on drawing attention to it – is Goodwood. Lord March’s headmasterly addresses at the Members’ and Revival briefings are observed in a hushed atmosphere, the respectful silence broken only by collective ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’ as we’re played a video of crashes and near misses from previous meetings.

As a competitor the great joy of Goodwood is its speed and unchanged layout, but this period purity comes with attendant risk and a palpable weight of responsibility. There have been more than a few big ones at Goodwood over the years, including some terrifying crashes at last year’s Members’ Meeting, but only a tiny minority have been due to combative driving. 

That said, I don’t think I’m speaking out of turn when I say there’s a sense of everyone holding their breath at the start of a Goodwood meeting, one that’s let out only when the last race reaches a safe conclusion. You can’t legislate for a stuck throttle or sudden brake failure, but the greater fear is not wishing to be the one to cause an avoidable accident. Least of all one that puts the life of spectators, marshals and fellow drivers in jeopardy,
or leads to the withdrawal of Goodwood’s competition licence.

That fear is a healthy one.

Nevertheless, I’m sure I’m not alone in thinking that as the cars continue to get quicker and the lead battles become more intense, something has to give. A nudge or a rub that might result in a harmless spin at Silverstone has potentially catastrophic consequences at Goodwood. We all get a bit giddy from time to time, but passes on the grass and BTCC-style nerfs shouldn’t be tolerated, no matter how exciting they appear or how uneventful the aftermath. The cars and the racing are thrilling enough without allowing that line to be crossed.

Ultimately I have faith in historic racing’s ability to self-police. If you compete in old cars you have a deep appreciation for the machines, respect for your fellow drivers and a genuine passion for the sport. It’s a sentiment that’s shared up and down the paddock. Vettel’s petulance has no place here.