MPH: Norris had no sympathy for Russell's F1 car complaints. Here's why

F1
Mark Hughes
August 5, 2026

Lando Norris responded bluntly to George Russell's complaints of struggling to adapt to this year's Mercedes F1 car, exposing more than just their different driving styles, says Mark Hughes; it shows where their heads are at

George Russell with Lando Norris

"If you're not ready to adapt, you;re not at the right level," said Norris in response to Russell's complaints

Bryn Lennon/F1 via Getty Images

Mark Hughes
August 5, 2026

Interesting recently to hear Lando Norris address George Russell’s difficulties adapting his driving style to the 2026 generation of car. “I had to change my driving style every single year of my life,” the McLaren driver said. “I guess [not changing] worked for him for 20 years. Not for me. My driving style worked in 2018, then that’s it. Since then, I’ve always had to change. The more experience you have in F1, the more prepared you are. If you’re not ready to adapt to a different machine, then you’re not at the right level. This is our job, we are paid millions to do it. We must drive any car they give us, good or bad, easy or difficult. You have to know how to do it.”

This is off the back of Russell’s tough season despite being in what is overall the fastest car. He’s continued to struggle with tuning into the Mercedes W17, especially on low-grip tracks and has watched as team-mate Kimi Antonelli has waltzed away to a dominant lead in the world championship, seemingly unencumbered by any demands made by how the car wants to be driven.

Asked why he can’t just look at Antonelli’s telemetry and copy, Russell’s response was: “It’s like if somebody asked you to draw the Mona Lisa and you’ve got the Mona Lisa next to you, do you think you could achieve it straight away? Maybe with practice.”

Melding driving styles with car traits is a very real thing and shouldn’t just be written off as a driver excuse. There is a big variation in how drivers are physiologically wired up and how therefore they feel the car and what they need from it to enable them to perform in a flow state, where they are maximising their ability without even thinking. Furthermore, Russell’s natural style of dominating a car, of ‘sitting on top of it’ rather than going with its flow works well in high-grip situations. But less well on these cars with their reduced downforce and smaller front tyres with high pressures – especially on low-grip surfaces. Norris doesn’t drive like that and never has, so will have had less problem adapting.

However their respective driving styles are maybe not as interesting as what these comments say about where each of their heads are at in this freeze-frame moment of time, mid-season ’26. And perceptions.

Lewis Hamilton spraying champagne with George Russell on the podium after the 2026 F1 British Grand Prix

An alternate championship without Antonelli, could see Hamilton leading the title race ahead of Russell

Clive Mason/Getty Images

To illustrate, let’s imagine a ’26 season where Antonelli is not present. In his place is a struggling rookie driver, leaving Russell as always the cutting edge of the Mercedes challenge. The readings of how good the Mercedes is would be taken from Russell’s performances. And they would look pretty good. He’d have been on pole six times from the 11 races and would have won three and retired from a dominant lead in Canada. Ferrari’s Lewis Hamilton would have been the beneficiary of Russell’s retirement there and would have followed up with two further wins in Monaco and Spain. So Hamilton would be leading the world championship, narrowly from Russell. Charles Leclerc would have followed up his Silverstone win with another at Spa in Antonelli’s absence. Russell would have been beaten by an apparently faster McLaren at Miami and Hungary, and by being unable to pass Oscar Piastri in Japan. Obviously the flapping butterfly wing effect would likely mean these imaginary races would have differed more than this, but just for the purposes of the performance perception, let’s just assume.

From the archive

The perception would be the Mercedes was a very fast car rather than a dominant one. There would be little to suggest that Russell wasn’t getting the best from it and he would be very much in the hunt for the drivers’ world championship. With the exact same level of performance we’ve seen in reality. So any difficulties he may have felt in tuning into the car’s feel would not be tormenting him the way they are. They would just be traits, part and parcel of the concept which is allowing the car to be so fast globally. His confidence would be sky-high as he relished the opportunity of fighting the Ferrari drivers for the title. The fact that there was – at certain low-grip tracks – performance in the car he wasn’t accessing would not be apparent. Neither to him nor the watching world. That has simply been exposed by an extraordinary talent in the other car. But it doesn’t mean that he was struggling to maximise the previous generation of car. It’s simply the combination of the ’26 car traits with the level of his team-mate which has created this troubling blip in the consistency of his performance. And it is consistency rather than peak pace. After all, even with Antonelli’s presence he’s taken four poles, two wins and been denied a third.

Let’s now look at Norris. A driver with a driving style which better lends itself to adaptability, more overlap of braking and cornering and thereby a greater variety of feasible corner entries for varying circuit grip. He has talked often about his early struggles with mental health and how he’s had to conquer self-doubt to win the sport’s ultimate prize. But even as world champion, his talent tends to be underrated. Perception again – and in his case it lags behind reality. He knows how good he is but when he perceives a slight to that level he’s quick to respond. He has weaknesses, just like any driver, and he knows what they are. But he is equally certain about the extent of his strengths and with a title behind him he’s delivering more consistently than ever. Certainly more than in his title season of ’25, and it’s feeding his confidence in an upward spiral.

Lando Norris holds the winning trophy after the 2026 f1 Hungarian Grand Prix

A confidence-fuelled Norris celebrates victory in Hungary

Grand Prix Photo

You hear it in his comments, he cannot contain the joy, relief, satisfaction of it. “We were just on another level today,” he said after his win in Hungary, “and I felt in a very good flow of things. When the car’s good and when I’m in a good flow, there’s no stopping me…

“[The] confidence that I’d win the race no matter what, whether [Piastri] boxed early or late or whatever. The pace advantage I had was huge today. But I don’t know why. The cars are identical, and I’ve just been feeling very strong lately. I’ve worked on many areas from last year. I feel much more confident lately with how to extract performance, and I’ve worked a lot with my engineers to understand this car because it’s certainly not an easy car to understand and figure out how to drive on the limit consistently. So, why? Just hard work. Hard work from my engineers and from myself to improve me as a driver and improve my driving.”

That elation, that feeling of being on top of the world, even in a car which has not been a title threat this year, is spilling out of him. The conversion of all that behind-the-scenes graft and how it’s allowing him to fully express his natural performance has got him walking on air. So when he hears about a rival complaining of a car not suiting him, a friend with whom he’s always had a competitive relationship, he’s not about to let it ride. He’s comfortable with himself at this level of performance and has no problem saying it as he sees it.

The contrast in form of Russell and Norris (relative to their cars) and how they are each reacting provides a fascinating glimpse into the psyche of competition at this level.

Mark Hughes

Grand Prix editor

In previous lives Mark raced cars, worked at Jim Russell racing school, got a university degree which he never used, tried working in industry, didn’t like it, left and joined Motoring News in 1988 as a junior club race reporter. Went freelance in ’96, concentrated on F1 from 2000. Grand Prix editor of Autosport for 10 years.

More from Mark