“I was very upset, worried and angry that McLaren had signed another rookie driver other than me,” he said in his witness statement.
“I asked MIM [his management team] to speak to Zak to ask what was going on.
“On September 22 they had a conversation with Zak, and Zak had told them they needed someone who would be quick in 2023 […] but that this would not interfere with my chances to get into F1.”
Giving evidence today, he further commented on his emotions when it became clear McLaren was going to hire Piastri: “That was when things first changed because they did not tell us the truth.”
Palou’s witness statement claimed that Brown had told him how the decision to hire Piastri was down to then-team boss Andreas Seidl, and not Brown, but Palou said that he now questions that.
“Why Oscar’s name never appeared in our conversations? Why sign another rookie? Someone experienced I could understand.
“If you say that is from Andreas, that is not going to interfere with my chances, I am believing it.
“[But] from what I have heard in the last days, apparently he [Mr Brown] makes all the choices. That was not what he told me.”
Brown stared determinedly at Palou as he gave his answer, then gave a short shake of the head.
Palou leads the way at Nashville 2025
IndyCar
Palou’s contractual situation meant that he remained with CGR in 2023. He agreed a new contract with McLaren to run from 2024-2026 after learning about Piastri’s hiring.
Asked why, Palou said that the pull of Formula 1 was too strong: “That is my dream, to get there. If that is what you are saying – I am going to get there — so I signed again.”
However, the IndyCar champion asserted that his impressions continued to change as 2023 wore on, despite taking on a reserve driver role with McLaren’s Formula 1 team, alongside his IndyCar duties.
He claimed that he did not get he “opportunities” he felt he’d been promised, including multiple F1 free practice appearances and more testing of F1 cars from previous seasons than he was given.
“I thought I had the right to terminate an agreement that was based on lies and false impressions,” he said.
McLaren contests Palou’s position that the F1 team’s promises of on-track running were not delivered on, Goulding saying in court that the Spaniard did not complete additional free practice and test session because he breached his contract.
The court was also told that Brown was paying Palou’s lawyers during mediation over contract disagreements between the driver, CGR and McLaren.