MPH: Will Ferrari find its happy place with new F1 upgrades?

F1

Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc have been working around Ferrari's flawed 2025 F1 car for most of the season. Upgrades arriving over the next two races could finally see them in the fight for regular race wins

Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton against red wall of Ferrari F1 pit garage

Is a mid-season turnaround in sight? Upgrades for Austria and Silverstone give Ferrari hope

Ferrari

This weekend at the Red Bull Ring Ferrari has a new floor available. This is the last major item of the 2025 car to be produced in the wind tunnel which is now devoted full-time to the 2026 car.

For Silverstone the following week it is expected that the Ferrari will also have its revised rear suspension.

It is hoped that the combination of the two updates will more comfortably allow the SF-25 to be run as low as in the opening two races. Only at Monaco, where the absence of high-speed sections meant the car could run an uncompromised ride height, has the car been fully competitive since it was disqualified from the results of Race 2 in China for excessive plank wear.

But in the last two races of Spain and Canada it has enjoyed something of a mini-revival of form on race day. A look at the pattern of Charles Leclerc’s race around Barcelona offers some clues as to why. Once the Ferrari pitwall had moved Lewis Hamilton aside for him, Leclerc had seven consecutive clear air laps before his first pitstop, running the same tyre compound as race leader Oscar Piastri. His average deficit to Piastri for those seven laps was 0.46sec. Which – Monaco aside — is a pretty standard sort of shortfall for this car since having to run its higher ride height, post-China.

But the second stints of Piastri and Leclerc — on the same medium compound tyre and doing the same planned two-stop strategy – overlapped for 16 laps, during which time Leclerc averaged just 0.27sec slower.

Charles Leclerc in Ferrari F1 car during 2025 F1 Canadian Grand Prix

Leclerc’s pace in Canada offered a glimpse of Ferrari’s potential

Ferrari

It’s not exactly a like-for-like comparison, but it’s a big enough difference to suggest that Leclerc was running the early part of his race at a deliberately slower pace than the middle part. A later radio communication requesting Leclerc to lift-and-coast was not about fuel or brake consumption — but to save on plank wear. So rather than running a much higher ride height than the car’s floor had been designed for — as had been the case between China and Imola — it looks like Ferrari had clawed at least some of its shortfall back by reducing ride height towards its early-season window but then having the driver control how much he was taking from the plank by not attacking the high-speed braking areas. This would explain the early cautious pace when the car was loaded with fuel, the more aggressive mid-race pace when the lower ride height could be more fully exploited without so much plank wear — and the later instruction in the early part of the final stint to back off.

It’s been just a work-around for the built-in limitation of this floor/rear suspension combination but it allowed Leclerc to make the podium in Spain and to show some real speed in between incidents in Montreal.

Related article

The root of the problem goes back to Ferrari’s choice of moving the cockpit of the SF25 back compared to last year’s car. Because the wheelbase was already at the regulation maximum, moving the front wheel axle line further forward entailed making the gearbox casing shorter by the same amount (5cm). The reworked cockpit position, together with the new pull rod front suspension offered potential aerodynamic benefits, allowing greater airflow volume to the tunnel inlets for the underfloor. But that shorter gearbox casing means that the rear suspension is in a more constrained space and it seems the damper cannot be made powerful enough to properly control the rear ride height at high speeds, especially over bumps or under braking. It’s simply too small for the job.

The combination of a new floor which redistributes the loading and a redesigned rear end should in theory put the Ferrari in a much happier place, one where its downforce can be fully exploited with less compromise in both set up and from the driver.

Ferrari’s chances of fighting for victories in the final season of this formula rest heavily on how effective this double update is going to be. But the political damage of that ill-conceived mechanical layout has already been inflicted.

You may also like