Matters of moment, April 1971

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Jaguar’s new V12
At a time when new British cars lack glamour or mechanical ingenuity, the advent of the long-awaited V12 Jaguar engine in a revised Series-3 version of the famous E-type high-performance car is a significant event. To celebrate it, Motor Sport publishes in this issue D.S.J.’s opinion of the new 5.3-litre twelve-cylinder E-type, as he has a profound knowledge of these cars gleaned from big mileages with two six-cylinder twin-cam E-types and was allowed to drive two versions of the new model on the road six weeks ago, and a full description of the new engine and how it is made by the Editor, who was permitted to examine it and discuss it with its designers at Coventry. There is a colour picture of it on the front cover and further colour illustrations on pages 347 to 350.

The production V12 engine is far from being a fresh concept, but Jaguar has the distinction of being the first British manufacturer to appear with one since the end of WW2. Indeed, the use of a dozen pots dates back to 1915, when Packard was selling a successful “Twin-Six”. Haynes and National followed suit and in Europe after the war Fiat introduced a neat 7-litre V12, Voisin a sleeve-valve of this layout (and was the only maker sufficiently eccentric to build an engine with 12 pots in-line), and some years later Daimler countered competition from the Rolls-Royce six-cylinder New Phantom with a series of complicated “Double-Six” models, made in both Knight and poppet-valve form, of from 3.7 to 7-litres, which conveyed our Royal Family around in an aura of dignity and blue smoke.

By the end of the vintage era the V12 was available in America from Auburn, Cadillac, Lincoln, Packard and Pierce-Arrow and represented the epitome of luxury, until the arrival of sixteen-cylinder models from Cadillac and Marmon, abetted by Bucciali in France. The V12 trend extended to Horch and Maybach in Germany, the latter’s Zeppelin model claiming airship-engine associations, and even to Czechoslovakia, where by 1930 Tatra had a 6-litre side-valve twelve with all the manifolding within the vee. Further kudos was given to the V12 when Birkigt concluded his splendid run of Hispano-Suizas with cars of this type, the largest of 11.3-litres, and when Rolls-Royce came round it considerably later, with the magnificent 7.3-litre Phantom Ill, both owing something, it is alleged, to aero-engine thinking, although they employed push-rods to prod their valves. Delahaye had a V12 and W. O. Bentley, after designing a long line of four- and six-cylinder engines, did a high-revving rather torque-lacking 4.44-litre V12 for Lagonda, with valve-gear similar to the new Jaguars, just before another war started. Since the war the V12 has become the hallmark of Ferrari and Lamborghini.

From the historical viewpoint the V12 is well established. But it was never as popular as the eight. In 1931 23% of the cars you could buy here had eight cylinders; only 1.56% were V12s. Today the V8 is universal in America, even for cars of up to 7-litres, and this number of cylinders suffices for the 6.7-litre Rolls-Royce/Bentley engine.

So the question may be asked, why have Jaguar gone to a dozen? The engineers responsible, Walter Hassan, OBE (ex-Bentley, ERA, SS, Jaguar and Coventry-Climax) and Harry Mundy (ex-ERA, BRM, Autocar and Coventry-Climax), say the V12 gives perfect balance, thus outstandingly smooth-running, and a high crankshaft speed, hence a safe high-power potential with reduced torque fluctuations. But they do not ignore the prestige value of having lots of cylinders, saying that it is Jaguar’s intention to widen the availability of the Ferrari/Lamborghini kind of engine, “achieving by use of the very latest machine tools a production volume which will bring this outstanding concept to buyers of competitively-priced cars”. However. Jaguar’s claim that they are about to bring “the magic world of twelve-cylinder motoring to a far wider cross-section of automobile connoisseurs than ever before” conflicts with their stated initial production rate for the new engine of some 9,100 a year, remembering that 21,000 Lincoln Zephyrs were sold in 1940 alone. This Lincoln engine had affinities with Ford’s V8 which first brought smooth-running, impressive torque and eight-cylinder charm to the masses and must be regarded as one of the cleverest automobile power units of all time…

Prestige certainly comes into V12 motoring. Daimler divided the radiator of their “Double-Sixes” down the middle to signify 12 cylinders and Hispano-Suiza cleverly refrained from putting their name on any part of their superb V12. Many luxury cars had double-barrel names to increase their snob appeal—Rolls-Royce, Hispano-Suiza, lsotta-Fraschini, Delaunay-Belleville, Sheffield-Simplex, etc.—but if Jaguar is no longer the SS-Jaguar, they can now at least display a V12-badge on the E-type.

Reactions to such an adventurous step-forward are bound to be mixed. Some will mourn the change from twin-cam head, the Jaguar hall-mark since W. M. Heynes introduced the brilliant XK engine in 1948 (although this is still used for the XJ6 saloons and Daimler Sovereign and is an alternative to the V12 for the E-type) and may even wish that the Heynes/Bailey 5-litre 4-cam petrol-injection 500 b.h.p. V12 engine which preceded the Hassan/Mundy V12 in the experimental shops could have gone into production.

Surprise is bound to be expressed that this CC-like Jaguar engine relies on one o.h.-camshaft per bank and a line of vertical valves above shallow wash-basin piston crowns, after all those decades of drooling over twin-cam hemi-heads. There may even be disappointment that the publicity top-speed figure for the bigger Series-3 E-type is 150 m.p.h., exactly the same as was claimed for the original E-type 10 years ago. In the 1970s one might expect the quoted maximum for a 5.3-litre V12 sports car to be 170 m.p.h. or thereabouts. One will also want to know about fuel consumption; some V12s have been notoriously thirsty.

However, the proof of the pudding is in the eating and Jaguar are clearly very anxious that their new recipe will prove digestible. They have spent £3 million tooling up to make the advanced and technically-exciting new V12 engine. They are spending much money on exhaust pollution research. If the world does not want big-engined twelve-cylinder cars Jaguar has no economy model to fall back on. So it is important for the V12 Jaguar to succeed and we wish Sir William Lyons, his technicians, workers, publicity staff, distributors and dealers the best of luck in this brave venture to supplement with a unique new power unit the successful Jaguar XK engine, of which more than 370,000 have been made. It is apparent that Jaguar regards this new car as one which should appeal to enthusiastic drivers of the kind who read Motor Sport and that, at least, is a good start!

Let us hope that, in the V12, Jaguar has found another “special kind of motoring which no other car provides”, to quote a Jaguar slogan, a car from which British Leyland and her export markets will benefit mightily, to the ultimate good of us all.