Rolls-Royce Reliability

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Rolls-Royce Reliability

One of the best-known demonstrations of RR reliabitty was on the Alpine Trial of 1913; here the cars prepare to leave the Conduit St. showrooms. The ways in which Rolls-Royce demonstrated the reliability of their famous 40/50 hp Silver Ghost are generally well-known. For instance, the famous 15,000mile RAC Observed Trial in 1907, which fully established this as not only the quietest car of its time but a remarkably dependable one. That this distance could be covered with but one involuntary stop (when the petrol-tap shook itself shut), had included the 2,000 miles of the Scottish Reliability Trial, and that when

the RAC engineers stripped the chassis down at the end of the test they found no wear in engine or transmission bearings, the back axle bevel gears unmarked, and the few parts needing possible replacement costing a mere £2 2s 7d, was very impressive. Tyre wear was over 2,500 miles per cover, the overall cost of the run working out at 41/4d a mile, the least expensive luxury travel available.

Then there was the splendid showing of the 40/50 hp Rolls-Royce in the 1913 Alpine Trial.

re-enacted so convincingly in 1973 and last year by many of these still-youthful RollsRoyces. But I wonder how many R-R followers know of another impressive test in which one of these cars took part? I refer to an RAC test of Castrol oil, undertaken in 1920. For this purpose a 1915 Rolls-Royce tourer was used, weighing 2.4 tons loaded. It was run on National Benzole fuel, and driven for 10,000 miles over the RAC’s six test routes, which took 61 days, with snow and rain on 24 of them, the average speed 19.9 mph — which sounds rather as if the RAC dared not admit to exceeding the 20 mph legal limit! When the engine was stripped down afterwards no wear was found in the cylinders, pistons or valvestems, compared to their satisfactory condition before the test started. A slight carbon deposit on the piston-crowns was thicker on the valve side and on two pistons a hard deposit had impeded the top rings. But generally all was in order and the state of the sparking-plugs, not cleaned during the test, was excellent. The oil had remained clean and had deteriorated very little: consumption was 9351/4 mpg. Tested chemically, the Wakefield-Castrol oil showed no benzole or acid content, and an increase of only 0.6% in suspended carbon. Nor had its specific gravity much changed during the 10,000 miles. But its viscosity had altered somewhat. Regrettably you can no longer buy National Benzole. But Wakefield Castrol oil is available and I have always used it. W B