Matters of Moment, August 1979

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Renault and the French Grand Prix

Since the adage that “today’s racing-car is tomorrow’s tourer” lost some of its authenticity, F1 racing has been mostly show-biz, with profitable financial pickings for the constructors, organisers, entrants and drivers. The excitement, the drama and the technical quality of the cars have not diminished. But some people dismiss modern GP cars as all looking alike, conducted by invisible supermen. Anyone who reads Motor Sport’s Race-Reports and Notes-on-the-Competing Cars knows that present-day F1 cars differ in subtle but important ways. However, a return to identification with makes, instead of with mainly Ford-Cosworth-engined hybrids, would inject fresh interest into this costly and intense promotion. Renault’s victory at Dijon was a start.

While the hybrid participants are hot after sponsorship-finance, Renault, Ferrari, Alfa Romeo who are showing interest (and whose engines power the Brabhams), and Lotus, as manufacturers of production cars, must surely set their sights on the research and publicity benefit of winning F1 races. It would be a good thing if the F1 circus was again to become make-versus-make racing. So we were delighted with Renault-Elf’s victory in the French GP and its very exciting near-second-place there, followed by second place in the British GP – the first turbo-charged car to win in F1. One can buy anything from a Renault 4 or a Renault 5 to a Renault 30TX, but Williams, who won the Silverstone race, do not make a road-equipped car, although if there were no roads to drive on one might fly with the Saudi-Arabian Air Line. . .

It was also fitting that Renault should have won the French GP again, because they won the first race of the series, in 1906 at Le Mans, when it was by far the most important in the calendar. Whereas it took Jean-Pierre Jabouille just over 1 hr. 35 min. to win the race this year, 73 years ago Francois Szisz had to battle for two days and 770 dusty miles to gain Renault their victory.

Even though they haven’t won a French GP between ’06 and ’79, Renault had achieved racing successes before 1906. For instance, they won the Paris-Vienna in 1902, the year before Marcel Renault, taking part in the sport he enjoyed best, was killed in the ill-fated Paris-Madrid race. Renault engaged in long-distance record-breaking in the vintage years, took the Turbine-Car record to over 190 m.p.h. in 1956 (see page 1131), won the Le Mans 24-Hour race last year, and now their 1 1/2-litre V6 Turbo-charged F1 cars have beaten the 3-litre opposition, perhaps losing the British GP because of appallingly-confused pit-work and, in this race, inadequate tyres.

Already the cry has gone out that turbo-charging is unjust and that there should be a restriction on the blower pressure of these cars. No doubt D.S. J. will comment about this in the appropriate place, if he sees fit. Our immediate reaction is that to extract maximum power from a racing engine is a legitimate aim, that the Renault engines comply with the F1 Formula current until 1981, and nothing which restricts engineering advances should intervene. When the Formula was devised, mechanically-driven superchargers may have been visualised, whereas a turbo-driven blower absorbs less power. It could be argued that, in the past, 3-litre and later 4 1/2-litre normally-aspirated engines took on the blown 1 1/2-litres, or 2 1/2-litres against the hypothetical blown 750s under another Formula. However, F1 engines are now required to use normal petrol, whereas in former times the blown engines had the benefit of high-content-alcohol fuels. This should be sufficient surely to keep interfering hands off Turbo-Renault development? A different argument is that if turbo-charged engines become the prevailing power in F1 racing, costs will soar and entries thus diminish, as happened when Delage dominated the 1 1/2-litre Formula in 1927. One expects, however. that rather than drop out altogether, members of the FOCA would give up some of their expensive motor-homes and jet-setting, in order to buy the required power packs . . .

Back to the theme of make-v-make racing, this is already apparent in F1, to some degree. Renault is in winning form, the Ferraris are entered as Fiat-Ferraris, Alfa Romeo is showing interest, with its engines in the Brabhams and, tentatively, a car bearing the marque name, and Lotus is a make-name, even if in F1 it has to share any honours with Cosworth-Ford. Historians may take heart from the fact that when Renault won the 1906 French GP it beat Fiat into first place but that in 1907 the placings were reversed, with Fiat beating Renault. After the war Fiat became triumphant by 1922, Alfa Romeo by 1924, and the Alfa Romeo/Ferrari battles of the post-WW2 years are well remembered. There is again a slight aura of inter-make competition about F1, which we hope will become more powerful. But it would be nice if Renault-Elf were to run under the blue of France, not in a hue that suggests to older followers of motor racing that they are Minervas . .

Of the Williams-won British GP, it can be said that BBC-TV gave very good coverage, even though unduly concerned with Championship-points prospects of the back-markers. We noted that commentator Jackie Stewart drew attention to Michelin shortcomings against Goodyear’s performance on this occasion: but Michelins were good enough for 1st, 2nd and 3rd at Dijon and 2nd place at Silverstone . . .

* * *

Return of the Turbines

Our article on turbine cars (page 1131) seems appropriately timed as we hear that the US Department of Energy is to award a contract for the development of an advanced gas turbine with the intention of exploring the potential for mass production. The intentions are for it to be a multi-fuel, low exhaust emission turbine with a thirst one-third less than a conventional internal combustion engine.

* * *

Bubble car exhibition

The Surrey Micro-Car Collection, which consists of post-war under 600 c.c. bubble cars and other little economy vehicles will be on view to the public between August 11th and 19th inclusive, from 6 p.m.-9.30 p.m. on weekdays, 1 p.m.-6 p.m. at weekends, at the Methodist Hall, Beddington Gardens, Wallington, Surrey. Such petrol savers as Messerschmitt, Isetta, Bond, Gordon, Peel, etc., numbering some 27 different makes and models will be on show.

* * *

ERA Club reformed

The ERA Club formed originally in 1935/36 to support the ERA team which was upholding British prestige in voiturette racing, has now been reformed so that it will have a wider basis than just an annual dinner. All those interested in the ERAs, as well as owners who are still racing these cars, are now welcome to join the reconstituted club, of which Raymond Mays, CBE is the patron and A. F. Rivers-Fletcher, Founder of the original ERA Club, is the President. The annual subscription is £2 and the Honorary Secretary and Treasurer is Guy Sporron, Arden Grange, Tamworth-in-Arden, Warwickshire.

* * *

Brands Hatch Six Hours

Porsche will be all out to maintain their supremacy in the Manufacturers World Championship in the Rivet Supply Six Hours race at Brands Hatch on August 5th. The March-built BMW M1 prototype, spurned at Le Mans is entered for Winkelhock, Grob and Edwards. The field will have a host of privateer Porsche 935s. Entries from most of the major teams were still anticipated at the time of writing.