Ford's new 2.8 litre, fuel injected, Capri

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Now that I have driven the 2.8i Capri for some ten days, ten days in which the car was driven at very high speed from Germany, at more sedate speeds for commuting and at a relatively leisurely pace down to Cornwall, I am very disappointed. Not with the 2.8 Capri, but with the 3.0S version which I use normally.

Usually, after a road test, I climb back into the 3.0S thinking how lucky I am to have a car which will reach 60 in a shade under nine seconds, cruise all day at 100+ m.p.h., return 22 to 24 m.p.g., depending on how it is driven, and yet costs under £7,000 – a useful yardstick against which to judge other manufacturer’s products. If the road test car has been an expensive super-car, I realise that such vehicles are not for normal mortals, and think how lucky I am to have a car which comes reasonably close. If it is a run of the mill saloon, then it is doubly gratifying to hear the snarl of the exhausts as I accelerate through the gears.

The 2.8 has changed all that, for it does everything the 3.0S does, but it does it so much better, in such a refined manner, and I cannot console myself with the thought that it costs twice as much, for its tax inclusive price is under £8,000 – and that includes items which are optional on the S, and which would push the price of the 3-litre to over the £7,000 mark.

It is the first child of Ford’s recently constituted Special Vehicle Engineering Department, and was nurtured from conception to birth in a shade over nine months by this small but capable team, led by Rod Mansfield. The recipe is quite simple in outline – take one Capri body shell, trim to Ghia specifications, add a 2.8-litre fuel-injected engine from a Granada, fit suspension, brakes and tyres to match, decorate with “injection” badges to taste and so on. It is to the team’s great credit that the fitting of the suspension, brakes and tyres to match has been done so very well, matching the car’s handling, roadholding and braking to its extra performance to produce a beautifully balanced, high speed touring car, superior to many costing half as much again. The only quibble that I have is with the “injection” badges – I would have chosen a more discreet size!

The interior of the body is trimmed with very pleasing blue checked fabric and thick carpeting which covers the lower parts of the doors. The head lining is matt black, and the instrument panel is just the same as that fitted to the 3.0S version. The seats are by Recaro, and are the same as those which may be had as an option on the lesser Capris, save that the “tennis racket” style head-rests have been replaced by properly upholstered versions. A stereo radio/cassette player and sunshine roof are standard items.

The subsitution of the German engine for the Essex unit has necessitated a different front cross member and a different bellhousing to mate with the manual-only gearbox. The suspension has been lowered by an inch all round and Bilstein struts are employed at the front with up-rated springs. At the rear, the axle is located simply by single-leaf half-elliptic springs, again uprated, and its movements are damped by Bilstein shock absorbers. Anti-roll bars are fitted front and rear, but these are 2 mm. thicker than those fitted to the 3.0S. The brakes at the front are revised with ventilated discs and heavy-duty pads are employed. The wheels are 13″ X 7″, of a very distinctive design and carry 205/60 Goodyear NCT tyres.

In Bosch K-Jetronic injected form, with transistorised ignition, the 2.8 engine develops 160 b.h.p. at 6,100 r.p.m. This is delivered very smoothly throughout the range. It is impressive how the car will pull away from below 25 m.p.h. in top gear without any snatch or hesitation, while at the other end of the engine speed scale, it happily whistles up to 6,100 r.p.m. (at which speed an ignition cut-out operates) delighting in being revved, unlike the 3-litre which shouts for an upward change between 4,500 and 5,000 r.p.m. It is only in the middle engine speed range that the Cologne engine is slightly inferior to the Essex unit, for the maximum torque levels are lower, with a consequent deterioration in top gear performance. Gone is that laziness-inducing push in the back when flooring the throttle at about 2,500 to 3,000 r.p.m. in top to pass an obstruction – in the 2.8 you need to change down.

The handling of the car is superb. It is beautifully chuckable and is well behaved on the limit, with no nasty vices. Unlike the 3-litre, which has tendencies towards understeer when pushed hard, the 2.8 is very neutral. The grip from the NCT tyres in all conditions is truly amazing, especially so in the dry, but once they do let go, for instance on a smooth, polished surface, it takes time to regain grip as the car has to be travelling so fast to unstick them in the first place. I learnt about this the hard way, while enjoying a couple of laps of the Nurburgring. Expecting the understeer I am used to from the 3-litre when entering a corner fast, I automatically induced a power-on tail slide. This was a mistake, for it broke the grip of the NCTs and resulted in a fish-tailing exercise. As I gathered everything together and headed off to the next corner, I realised that I should have given the design team credit for improving the handling of the car to such an extent that the minimal natural understeer can be balanced very easily on the throttle alone without having to deliberately put the car into an oversteering attitude. The 2.8 driven almost sedately achieves the same cornering speeds as the 3.0S on the ragged edge, and when the 2.8 is on the ragged edge itself, it handles better than the 3-litre. It amazes me how a single leaf rear spring can locate the back axle so effectively, giving characteristics so much better than many independent set ups.

Leaving the Eifel Mountains, we headed cross country for Belgium and the French coast. On the road, the car is so much quieter than the Essex engined version, the exhaust being especially subdued until the revs rise towards their maximum when a satisfying roar accompanies the car’s progress. Charging up and down the forest lined roads, similar to the better Welsh A roads, I found I was using the gear lever more than I would have expected, and commented to Rod Mansfield, my passenger, that I thought the change had been improved, even though I knew the gearbox was the same unit. The answer should have been obvious – the gear lever has been shortened, making the travel between the gears that much less, and the change more positive. The ride on rough surfaces is somewhat harsher, which is to be expected in view of the uprated springs, but roll on corners is considerably reduced. The power assisted steering has three turns from lock to lock and has rather more feel than the previous model. This, coupled with the more neutral handling, made the hilly and twisty roads a real pleasure to drive along, although the inside rear wheel tended to spin very easily if power was applied too soon on the exit from a tight bend.

The performance in the gears never failed to delight me. Whether it was charging between corners for the sheer exhilaration of speed, or being employed more sensibly for safe overtaking, it was a source of immense satisfaction. 60 m.p.h. comes up in well under 8 seconds from standstill and second gear will carry the car on to 65 m.p.h. before the limiter comes into operation. Third is good for over 90, and once out on to the autobahn, we discovered that maximum revs can be achieved in top gear, some 130 m.p.h., given favourable conditions. The car is happy cruising at 125, and we covered a large number of miles at around this speed, the stability being very confidence inspiring.

Fuel consumption on the hard and very fast journey to Calais worked out at a very creditable 22.7 m.p.g. – my Essex engined car would have returned well under 20 m.p.g. in its futile attempts to keep up – and rose to a very impressive 24.8 m.p.g. for commuting from Berkshire into the city, rising still further to 27.2 m.p.g. when used gently (but nonetheless at speeds which would have had me in trouble if the boys in blue had seen me) for a long weekend in Cornwall. The car could be made even more economical if a five-speed gearbox was used – it is not under-geared in its present form, but it could easily pull an overdrive fifth which would add enormously to the pleasure of driving the car long distances on motorways.

At £7,995, no-one can claim that it is a cheap car in real terms, but to obtain similar performance and comfort, one has to look at least at a Porsche 924 (£9,100), which only beats the Capri on fuel consumption, or a 2.5 V6 Alfa Romeo GTV at £9,400. The Ford does not have the magic of these names, but it deserves great success for it does the same job at less initial cost and it will almost certainly be cheaper to run. – P.H.J.W.

Related articles

Related products