Editorial, August 2003

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

While sifting through some back issues of Autosport the other day my attention was grabbed by a news story, the headline of which ran something like: Ecclestone blah blah Silverstone controversy blah blah. And this was from almost 20 years ago. Not much changes in this sport – sorry, business – of ours, as the photo of the traffic jam at the 1948 British Grand Prix proves (see page 69). Indeed, little of the British GP experience is new.

The BRDC wants to change that: new roads, new facilities, better viewing, better all round. The work is under way; the big question is can it be finished before Bernie pulls the plug on the event? Or is he just jerking the BRDC’s chain? Silverstone is not the best circuit in the world, but it’s far from the worst. As such, Ecclestone’s constant sniping (a lot of which is valid) has always struck me as an excellent way of keeping the other F1 races in order. Thinks the organiser of the prospective Belarussian Grand Prix: if Britain, the centre of motorsport, is getting it in the neck like this, we had better be on our very best behaviour…

There certainly seems to be something personal between Ecclestone and the BRDC. And you can see how this might have come about: Bernie is not one for air and graces; the BRDC stemmed from heirs and Your Graces. It began life as a gentlemen’s dining club and has clung to that image ever since. Its president, Sir Jackie Stewart, who is passionate about the Club’s past, present and future, knows that it faces a difficult balancing act: it needs to maintain its brand – there is a cachet in exclusivity, as cricket’s MCC has proved – but it also needs to make Silverstone more inclusive.

You may, understandably, wonder whether this can be achieved. For Stewart’s dream of making Silverstone a 365-day activity destination to become a reality, he’s going to need a solid wedge of Government money, to be liberally sprinkled with private sector cash. However, a certain person’s £1m bung to a certain political party has made motorsport a hot potato down Westminster way; New Labour is happy to pour money into New Wembley, but Silverstone can go whistle.

That’s always been so; British motorsport has got as far as it has due only to the entrepreneurial spirit of the likes of Stewart and Ecclestone. Both men are imbued with a love of the sport, but both understand the unavoidable political and financial complexities of its modem idiom. They’re fighting a game of political chess right now – Silverstone the pawn, the stakes high.

Its outcome? My guess is that, in 10 years time, a headline in the Autosport that carries the British Grand Prix report (and a preview to the first Belarussian GP) will read: Ecclestone blah blah Silverstone controversy blah blah

Let’s hope so anyway.