Road cars

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Alfa Romeo has announced the return of the Alfa Spider, to be built by Mazda in Hiroshima from 2015. Don’t be appalled. The car will be developed jointly by Alfa and Mazda over the next three years, the Mazda version being the new MX-5. Each will use their own engines, styling and set up, so all the joint venture will really ensure is that they’re built properly in a volume that makes sense for both manufacturers. You can also expect the result to be light and, most importantly, rear-wheel drive.

I’ve always wondered whether the Alfa Spider would live in our hearts in quite the same way had Benjamin Braddock not been given a Duetto as a graduation present. The truth not relevant to The Graduate was that those early Spiders were merely pleasant cars, a modest standard to which all subsequent Spiders failed to aspire. By the early 1990s, the Spider had descended into complete self-parody and ended up a sad, antediluvian shadow of its not-that-great former self, not so much a has-been as a never-really-was.

Nor can much that is nice be found to say about the front-wheel drive Spiders that followed, either the GTV-based model of the 1990s or the Brera Spider of the last decade. Like the first Spider, the moment you had drunk in their undeniably attractive appearance, you’d already experienced absolutely the best they had to offer. No car should be at its best when parked and certainly not an Alfa Romeo.

Nevertheless, my hopes are high for the new one. Forget Alfa’s last Japanese JV resulting in the Arna and Nissan Cherry Europe and focus instead on a more recent but still distant collaboration. In the late ’80s Alfa Romeo joined with Fiat, Lancia and Saab to create a new ‘Type 4’ platform. Just like this new deal with Mazda, all parties used the same chassis but were allowed total freedom to clothe and power it how they chose. It resulted in the Fiat Croma, Lancia Thema, Saab 9000 and Alfa 164. And of them all it was the Alfa that was best by far. I think there is every chance that the new Alfa Spider won’t be the best since the original, but the best full stop.

While we’re on the subject of car manufacturers evoking spirits from their past, Renault appears on the point of putting Alpine back into action. At the Monaco Grand Prix it first showed and then ran this extraordinary looking concept car called the A110-50, allegedly to celebrate the original A110 reaching its half century.

Of course, all the talk is of whether it’s going to make it into production. We have to be careful here because manufacturers are very good at suggesting they might turn concepts into cars when, in fact, they have not the slightest intention of doing anything of the sort because it increases coverage many times over.

Then again concepts that actually work properly usually demonstrate a level of commitment by their creators far beyond what’s needed to create an inanimate object and park it on a motor show stand.

But let’s assume just for a moment that Renault is sincere when it says it is actively looking at ways of putting the car into production. What should it be? Clearly it should be small, light and place its engine behind the driver, all of which the concept achieves, courtesy of its Mégane Trophy race car underpinnings.

I think it should then be tuned to be a maximum attack track day car with enough civility to drive to the ’Ring and back without reducing its occupants to tears. So it needs a small amount of luggage space, a decent-sized fuel tank, heating and options such as air-conditioning. Any attempt to go after the Porsche Cayman would be doomed.

The problem with my suggested approach is that sales volumes would be low, so the purchase price would need to be high, and is anyone going to spend a lot of money on an Alpine? If the last one, the great driving but glacially slow-selling A610, is any guide, the answer would seem to be few. But the A610’s problem was they aimed it at 911 buyers, an inevitably doomed strategy. Renault’s maths alone will tell them if it can make money out of a stripped-out but still expensive track day car. If not, I expect we’ll be waiting a while yet for Alpine to return.

I have fumed at length on the website the Government’s crowd-pleasing yet thoughtless decision to exempt pre- 1960 cars from the MoT test, so won’t dwell on it for long here. But as they appear to have developed a Toivonen-type skill for hand-brake turns on all matters from pasties to buzzards, is it too much to hope for one here?

Briefly, their pitch is that owners of pre-60 cars are such good coves who maintain their cars so well they don’t need MoTs. My pitch is that this is arrant, dangerous nonsense. Now any old wreck that’s been slowly rotting away in a shed these last few years, because it has no more chance of passing an MoT than I do of winning the Targa Florio, can now be put back on the road entirely legally. Far worse than this, cars with potentially lethal faults that would be picked up in an instant by anyone qualified to issue an MoT certiicate can be tarted up and logged on to some poor, unsuspecting member of the public. And if the Government thinks that not a single person involved in the old car world is capable of behaving this way, they are even more removed from reality than I thought.

The man responsible, Greg Knight MP, has accused me of making heavy weather of this issue. He may have a point, but not half as big a point as will be made to him and his Government by the families of the irst innocent bystanders to be injured or worse by a mechanical failure on a pre-60 car that would otherwise have been spotted by a routine MoT check. After less than 18 months in the role, Bentley boss Wolfgang Durheimer is leaving Crewe to become head of R&D for Audi. While the news is undoubtedly good for Audi and a clear it for Durheimer who is an engineer irst and foremost, it means Bentley is about to usher in its third CEO in two years. That man is Wolfgang Schreiber who is currently in charge of VW’s commercial vehicle operations. The better news is that Schreiber has also been both technical and managing director of Bugatti.

Time will tell what this means for Bentley. Unlike Schreiber, Durheimer is not a VW careerist and was at both BMW and a then independent Porsche before joining Bentley. Durheimer also has racing in his blood and had commissioned a feasibility study into the possibility of returning Bentley to Le Mans. All I hope is that Schreiber sticks around and brings stability back to the Bentley board.

Andrew Frankel

Related articles

Related products