Andrew Frankel: “These aren’t bad headlines about Aston and McLaren, they’re human disasters”

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

15

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

There are, it would seem, very few reasons to be cheerful about Britain’s indigenous motor industry right now. In May, McLaren announced 1200 job losses, the vast majority coming from its road car business. In June, it was 500 from Aston Martin, followed swiftly by 1000 at Bentley. That’s just at the time of writing. Jaguar Land Rover has yet to announce any, but even that has to be seen in the context of the 4500 jobs it shed last year. This year’s sales are projected to be down by as much as 20 per cent.

For those companies, this is not good reading. For those thousands who have lost their jobs, and the thousands more in the supply chain we read about far more rarely, these aren’t bad headlines, these are very personal, human disasters. But at the same time, we must look to the future and plot a route out of the mess. The starting point must be that almost all premium British car manufacturers comprise desirable brands.

When I think of the stuff Aston Martin, Land Rover, Bentley, Jaguar and Rolls-Royce were peddling when I started in the business in the late 1980s compared to their products today, well there is no comparison. Lotus too appears to be at the dawn of a new era. When I think of the rubbish that wobbled out of British Leyland in the 1970s, I realise just how far we have come. I dare say the short-term future of most if not all of the above will be hideously hard at times, and the medium term may not look quite as imagined a few months ago, but that there is a future for them in the long term is not something I doubted before COVID-19, and I don’t doubt it now.

Of these companies, it is the future of McLaren and Aston Martin that interests me most, because unlike their rivals, neither is owned by an automotive giant. Both are independents, both funded primarily by money from the Middle East. And some say both now face similar issues. There is truth in that, but only to a certain extent. Both have built more cars than the market will currently wear, both are now dealing with the inevitable effect of that on individual markets. But look closer, and you’ll see the criticisms levelled at both are entirely different.

“The DBX appears to be Aston’s route out of troubled times”

Aston Martin has been lambasted for trying to do too much, too soon and thereby losing the confidence of the City, disastrous for a part-publicly owned company. It has three front-engined coupés in production, three mid-engined cars in the works, and an all-new SUV on an all-new platform now being produced in an all-new factory in South Wales.

McLaren Automotive, on the other hand, has drawn flak for not doing enough, thanks to the fact that every car it’s produced in its 10 years to date has been a carbon-tubbed, mid- engined two-seater powered by a twin-turbo V8 engine running to the rear wheels alone via a seven-speed double-clutch gearbox.

Whether either, both or neither got it right in the past I am no better a judge than anyone else, but what I can say is that the two companies cannot be treated in the same way: for McLaren to build an SUV now would surely be a disaster, while the full order book for the DBX is looking like Aston Martin’s route out of these troubled times.

But both will know already that the foreseeable future requires far fewer cars to be built than was previously anticipated, and it is the acceptance of that fact that lies behind the bulk of the job losses. This however does not preclude for a moment the prospect of either company returning to profit and soon, for they make some of the most desirable cars on earth.

Where should the cuts come? Aston Martin should focus on having three utterly distinct products: a front-engined super GT, a mid- engined supercar and an SUV, with detail variants of each to flesh out the range. This would mean combining the Vantage, DB11 and DBS into one car, positioned far nearer the DBS because that fits with likely volume aspirations and provides the biggest margin.

For McLaren, we will have to wait and see what the new Sports Series car will be like. I understand that it is a new car from stem to stern, the first to be powered by McLaren’s new compact V6 motor and the first standard production McLaren to come complete with a hybrid powertrain.

And I look forward to its introduction very much, probably at the end of this year or early next. But I still hope that, in addition to this replacement model, it does something else entirely. A front-engined 2+2 would get my vote. Such cars are not without their issues, Ferrari four-seat GTs always depreciate faster than its two-seat supercars, but even the presence of those rear seats, whether usable in reality or not, makes the car saleable to a constituency McLaren is not reaching at the moment. And now it can make its carbon fibre at its new composites facility in Sheffield, hopefully, the economics will have become easier, too. Think of a car with the everyday usability of a Porsche 911 Turbo, looks to make an Aston Martin DB11 feel insecure, and a driving experience to make a Ferrari Lusso seem ponderous.

No easy task I’m sure, and maybe it’s too big a punt, particularly at the moment, but if anyone could pull off such a car, I’d back McLaren to do it.