Bridging the Performance Gap

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Current page

197

Current page

198

Current page

199

Current page

200

Current page

201

Current page

202

Current page

203

Current page

204

Current page

205

Current page

206

Current page

207

Current page

208

Current page

209

Current page

210

Current page

211

Current page

212

Current page

213

Current page

214

Current page

215

Current page

216

Current page

217

Current page

218

Current page

219

Current page

220

Results don’t suggest a shift in the WEC’s balance of power, but things are changing

Toyota gave the World Endurance Championship a present in the run-up to the Fuji round in October. It agreed to a double performance hit for its TS050 Hybrids in the interests of igniting some kind of competition at the sharp end of the grid. Yet a glance at the results of the Japanese round of the WEC suggests that it wasn’t so much an unwanted gift as one that wasn’t much use to anyone. 

The best of the privateer LMP1s, the Rebellion-Gibson R-13 shared by André Lotterer, Bruno Senna and Neel Jani, was still four laps in arrears of the two Toyotas after six hours of racing. That was the same margin between the top independent and the TS050s at Silverstone back in August, prior to the Japanese cars’ exclusion in post-race scrutineering for a technical infringement.

Yet there were signs that the efforts of the rule makers to ensure that the 2018/19 WEC superseason doesn’t continue as a Toyota-dominated ‘boreathon’ might be turning the corner. There were moments at the Fuji Speedway — but admittedly only moments — when the privateers suggested that they might be able at least to keep the TS050s honest. 

TOYOTA’S GIFT

The WEC knew it had a problem on its hands when Porsche dropped its bombshell, in July 2017, that it would be leaving the LMP1 division of the WEC for the brave new world of Formula E. Part of the rescue plan to keep the championship alive was a promise of lap-time parity for the privateers to ensure that Toyota didn’t waltz into the distance. 

The problem for the WEC is that it made a promise it couldn’t keep. It ran counter to FIA stability rules, which meant that the unanimous agreement of the participants was required for any rule changes. Most pertinently that meant Toyota’s agreement. 

Toyota did make concessions that gave the privateers rule breaks – grandly titled the Equivalence of Technology, the term carried over from the days when the rule makers were trying to balance turbodiesel Audis with their petrol-powered rivals and cars of different hybrid outputs. But what it didn’t do was agree to slow the TS050s. Until Fuji, that is. 

Toyota acquiesced to a 26kg hike in the minimum weight of the TS050s, which was actually only a 20kg hit because the cars were marginally overweight. And it also agreed to wipe another advantage. The original EoT allowed its cars to go two laps further than the opposition between refuelling stops in the six-hour WEC races. 

The clamour for Toyota to make concessions inevitably grew after its domination at Silverstone, despite a new EoT designed to bring the privateers closer. 

“We came to the conclusion that we could not continue as at Silverstone,” said Toyota technical director Pascal Vasselon ahead of Fuji. “We clearly needed to provide a better spectacle.”

Vasselon was, however, at pains to point out that the pre-Fuji changes do not apply to the Le Mans 24 Hours, the blue riband round of the WEC. Toyota believes that the Silverstone EoT, which removed a notional lap time advantage of 0.25 per cent in its favour, will allow the privateers to be competitive when the WEC returns to Le Mans next June for the superseason finale. That’s because the power that its hybrid systems can unleash is significantly less per kilometre around the eight and a half miles of the Circuit de la Sarthe than at the regular WEC tracks by regulation.

DID CHANGES WORK?

The privateers were closer in Japan for the fourth round of the 2018/19 WEC. The third-placed Rebellion was four laps down again, though on a shorter circuit, and would have been closer to the Toyotas had it been under any kind of pressure from any of the other privateers. Its sister car, driven by Gustavo Menezes, Thomas Laurent and Mathias Beche, who were awarded the Silverstone win, was already out of the race and the SMP Racing squad encountered a series of technical problems with its AER-engined BR Engineering BR1s. 

Rebellion admitted that it had moved closer to the pace at Fuji. “Closer, but not close enough,” was how team principal Bart Hayden described it.

Toyota, meanwhile, claimed that there was evidence from qualifying and the race that suggested the privateers might be ready to start hassling the Toyotas soon under the present EoT. 

Jenson Button kept pace with the winning Toyota during one stint in Japan
Jenson Button kept pace with the winning Toyota during one stint in Japan

Vasselon suggested the 0.8sec margin between the pole-winning Toyota and the Rebellion that qualified third in the hands of Lotterer and Jani was covered by the advantages that come with being able to run its hybrid contender in a qualification mode not available to the privateers. He also pointed to the pace of Jenson Button in the best of the SMP Racing entries after it had dropped back as a result of alternator problems. 

“Jenson comes out of the pits in front of our no7 car [the winning Toyota driven by Kamui Kobayashi, Mike Conway and José Maria López] and gentlemanly let it past before staying right behind for a complete stint,” said Vasselon. “Not one or two laps, but a complete stint. He did a full stint in touch with our car.

“This shows that the potential is there, but apparently it is difficult for the privateers to put everything together over the full race. All the ingredients are there; I would say we now have a very good EoT.”

WHAT’S NEXT?

The privateers are angling for a couple of tweaks to the EoT ahead of the Shanghai WEC round in mid-November. The per-lap fuel allocation they were given for Fuji meant the drivers of the Rebellions and the BREs were having to lift and coast to hit the numbers and avoid penalties. 

This, claim the independent teams, ran contrary to a post-Le Mans agreement that they wouldn’t have to take what are known as fuel cuts. They estimate that these are worth between three and four tenths a lap. 

Toyota still has an advantage in the pits in the time it takes for the fuel to go into the car, down from the five seconds at the start of the season to just two. The privateers want it removed and argue that the deficit here is exacerbated by the Toyota’s ability to leave the pits on electric power. There’s no cranking of engines and finding the biting point of the clutch in the Japanese hybrids.

The privateers are making gains, thanks to the EoT regulations and in terms of natural development of what are for the most part new cars, but they firmly argue that they are still going to require a bit of help under the EoT if they to make a fight of it. 

And that’s going to require another act of charity from Toyota.