Matters of moment, February 1977

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Renault and racing

Those of us who think that racing at Grand Prix level is enhanced by the participation of manufacturers will be delighted that Renault have declared their intention of coming back into the Grand Prix field this year. It was Renault who won the first French GP of 1906—the first unless, like some erudite historians, you prefer to count further back to earlier French races dating from 1895. To most people, however, 1906 is regarded as the year of the first Grand Prix, and in those days the GP was a very important event, contested between rival manufacturers. Szisz on a big side-valve Renault won it convincingly, over 770 miles of the Le Mans circuit. Renault by that time had a fine reputation for high-grade motor carriages and their previous successes in the field of voiturette racing, which cost Marcel Renault his life, were obviously regarded as good publicity, which aided sales of Renault products. Whereas the earlier Gordon Bennett races had been contests between Nations, the new Grand Prix was the proving ground of rival manufacturers. They strived hard to win it, and up to 1914 the honours went to Renault, Fiat, Peugeot and Mercedes. Back in 1963 that then celebrated Motor Sport contributor, “Baladeur”, wrote of how winning the great motor races probably produced worthwhile sales among wealthy motoring enthusiasts, suggesting that in 1895 such customers would have invested in a 3-h.p. Peugeot, would have bought Panhards from 1897 to 1900, then changed to a Mors in 1901, and thereafter successively patronised Mercedes, Itala and Fiat, purely on account of the good competition showing of such cars.

In recent times F1 racing has been devoid of such manufacturer interest. True, Ford sponsors the Cosworth V8 GP engine, and Lotus followers probably feel that a close affinity exists between their road-going Lotuses and the Lotus-Cosworth John Player GP machines. For Ferrari enthusiasts the full significance of a Ferrari GP victory is there, clear and undisguised. But otherwise the line-up for a current F1 race is devoid of any close association with car manufacturers, as the buyers of road-going products understand it.

So Renault’s intention to re-enter the highly competitive field of GP racing this year is full of promise. It is to the great French manufacturer’s lasting credit that he is not over-publicising the advent of the proposed V6 turbo-charged GP car. If it makes its debut at the French GP this will enliven things at Dijon in July, even if it is too much to expect a brand-new car to win first time out, which sounds like crying wolf… ! But we welcome the proposed entry of this car manufacturer in top-flight motor racing and it is a good link-up with Renault’s top production model that the F1 car is to have a vee-six-cylinder engine.

Renault are also well aware of the impact of successful motor racing in other spheres. They hope to win Le Mans this year and if the cars they use will bear little resemblance to the sports Bentleys, Lagondas, Chenard-Walckers, Salmsons, Alfa Romeos and Jaguars, etc. that we once associated with the great 24-hour battle round the Sarthe circuit, the fact remains that victory for Renault in the famous French race would be remarkably good for the Billancourt image. Renault have a long and proud record in the competition field, from that first Grand Prix win at 63 m.p.h. over 70 years ago to capturing the World’s 24-hour record with that remarkable tandem-seater Renault 45 saloon, taking turbine-car honours, vanquishing the Sahara Desert, winning all manner of rallies with a wide variety of different models, etc. So we welcome the interest this Nationalised concern of Regie Renault is showing in modern motor racing, and we wish it well.