The rights and wrongs of it are another matter, but I think that it is high time that DSJ and his other pontificants should accept the fact that the word ‘replica’ just isn’t what it used to be. Times change— but DSJ does not seem to change with them!
The kit car fraternity has coined the word ‘replica’ to apply to virtually anything that looks vaguely like something original. This has been developing for a number of years, and there is very little that can be done about this at this stage, so there is little point in DSJ pontificating about dictionary definitions. I agree that there might be more applicable words which describe a ‘lookalike’ better, but ‘replica’ is what appears to have become common usage. So I suggest that DSJ should face up to reality. ‘Replica’ is here to stay—the same as in America a bonnet is a hood, which over here is something completely different. Try changing America.
R. GRAHAM Redhill, Surrey
A bit of fun with the 'Old Crocks'
The theme of the Brooklands reunion on 2 July will be Aston Martins and veteran cars. Both are appropriate, because Aston Martins were prominent at the Track from 1921 until…
HSCC Castle Combe
A mid-morning snowstorm followed the early drizzle, yet by early afternoon there was sufficient balmy sunshine to generate custom for the ice-cream vendors. The Historic Sports Car Club’s 50th anniversary…
Continental Notes and News, October 1938
By AUSLANDER Here's News The News of the : Imith, I think, is contained in a letter I have received from a reader of this paper who has himself performed…