Temporary measure

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Sir,
Permit me to refer to DSJ’s October Letter To Readers, wherein he insinuates “Vandalism”, with question mark, in relation to TARF II and York Motor Museum. Now I feel Jenks is being a little unkind to us here, for according to my information “vandalism” is described by Collins Dictionary as being “a barbarous destruction of works of art”.

Certainly TARF II has had a Dino Ferrari engine installed plus Rover 2000 gearbox, but if we could persuade the previous custodian of the car to sell us the originals we would certainly install them, and then Jenks could consider retracting his, in my personal view, somewhat unfair remarks.

Meantime the car resides in our museum looking lovely in its freshly done livery. And as we have been able to at least temporarily homologate what seems to be a friendly international mating of car, motor and gearbox, we are able, when the odd suitable occasion presents itself, to show it publicly doing what it has done best — which was of course just going.

For your interest and those of your readers, I enclose a photograph of said car as she presently rests.

James Harwood, Curator, York Motor Museum, York, Western Australia.

Nice to know TARF looks well, even if it has mechanical stomach ache, and high praise indeed to the York Museum if it can regain the original engine and gearbox. We’d like to know why the Maserati unit was removed and what has happened to it. DSJ