Nivelles' loop hole

Author

Motor Sport

View profile
Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Sir,

What a pity that the article about Nivelles in your December 2002 issue missed the real background and history of this former Formula One circuit.

When my father designed Nivelles, it included the most up-to-date safety installations, urgently required as Spa was getting too dangerous. Of course, these two circuits cannot be compared: Spa was a traditional driver’s track with a great history but claiming too many lives; Nivelles was the modern alternative that was never completed.

The complete design of Nivelles included an extension in the form of a second big loop at the point where the hairpin comes back on the main straight, making the circuit about one mile longer. In addition, the two loops were to be linked to make a fast ‘oval’, albeit with irregular corners around the complex. The simple 180-degree return was only supposed to be used as a shorter ‘test’ circuit.

The owners announced the plans for the circuit too early (before buying the complete site). When they wanted to buy the second part for the extension, the price had gone up and they couldn’t afford to complete the original plan. With that, and a lack of finance, its future was doomed. When the neighbours started to complain about noise, the decision was made easy for the local council.

If Nivelles had been a success, with revenues coming into the local economy, it would never have been closed down.

I raced at Nivelles in the early 1970s and it was an interesting and fast circuit; with the extension it would have been even better and more technical.

We must not forget that too many circuits are designed to fit a plot of land that is really too small to include all the buildings, parking and still have an interesting design. Here, a bad strategy by the owners and a lack of money caused it to fail.

I am, yours etc, John Hugenholtz, via E-mail

Related articles

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore

Related products

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore