An MG-C Club

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

—And Against

Sir,

I was interested to read the letter from Mr. Willmer suggesting that it would be “irresponsible” to form another MG Car Club. A myriad already exist within the so called MGCC in its “registers”, which are also mentioned.

My concept of a “register” is such as to detail chassis and engine nos. and limited history etc. of worthwhile motor cars of limited production and I see it as essentially distinct from, though analogous to, the hunt for spares (for an MG-C—really?).

Certainly I consider the MGCC register mad, and whilst too few agree with my historical interpretation that MG proper ceased manufacture in 1936 I do entirely fail to comprehend the potential camaraderie of ownership between the possessor of an o.h.c. car and say that of a lump of bulbous 1950s badge engineered Magnette (what a prostitution of that name), and as for registering them for posterity . . .well!

In attempting to indiscriminately appeal to such a very wide range of interest, with just two letters on a badge in common (largest one make car club they drool) I consider that they appeal to no particular section satisfactorily, and equally lower the standards of potential service to members by this fragmentation of resources.

As a member a both the VSCC and the MGCC and both having similar membership figures, it is with awe that I regard the organisation and efficiency of the former. Certainly they have a clearer philosophy. But I know cases where MMM MG owners (are there any others?) have received more forth coming and useful help from VSCC sources than the MGCC—perhaps through them being devoid of the nasty sectional self interest which can be smelt in some MGCC circles—and this for usually ineligible cars. Who says there’s no room for another MGCC? Some people got so sick they formed one for pie-1955 cars, which was a step in the right direction anyway. What I can say though to the chap with the MG-C is go ahead, join the MGCC. It will be just your cup of tea!

Prestwich MAURICE GLEESON

[This correspondence is now closed—ED.]