Matters of moment, January 1991

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

On the Spot

We believe that in spite of the enormous flow of traffic composed of vehicles of widely varying size and speed, from the unlit bicycle to the biggest of trucks, which use our outdated road system day in and day out, and all night, the accident rate has, in general, shown a welcome decline. Yet fresh legislation is pending, for infliction on road users. At least we have been forewarned, rather as Saddam Hussein was being kept aware of what weapons were being brought up with which to repel him and when these would be in place!

Clearly, road accidents must be reduced still further by all means possible, for injury and loss of life are an enormous sadness, whether in peacetime or in war. All we ask is a fair deal for the motorist. Little can be done against radar speed traps, as Royals as well as commoners know. Quite why speed is again a scapegoat, just when Police Chiefs and others were advocating higher limits on Motorways to reduce bunching and congestion, is a mystery. It seems odd, despite the great increase in traffic volume, that for years the old 20 mph speed limit was virtually ignored, giving freedom on the ‘open road’ and when the 30 mph limit was introduced, it was imposed only in ‘built-up areas’, yet since the building at fabulous expense of fine Motorways to speed up transport, we have been encumbered with speed restrictions which seem likely to be lowered still further.

Another worry is how ‘dangerous driving’, which replaces ‘reckless driving’, for which very heavy new penalties are to be imposed, will be judged by the police and those informers who report to them. The problem here is that driving skill varies between different persons to such an extent that it is almost impossible to assess the ability, the safety factor, of another driver. Apart from personal experience, the car being used, the state of the road, and of the weather, these and so many other factors come into the equation.

DSJ has reminded us, in his book The Racing Driver (Batsford, 1958), of the ‘tenths’ system evolved by Godfrey Imhoff and Holland Birkett for describing personal driving prowess. We later had great fun using it to determine the difference between drivers ranging from the timid maiden aunt and inexperienced District Nurse in her first car, to top GP aces. Space would preclude publishing the full table, amusing as this was, assuming a copy exists; but, roughly, it assessed a wide range of skills, or the lack of them. For example, that nurse might normally proceed at what to her would be 4/10ths but to us and most of our readers would represent 2/10ths. She might speed up to 5/10ths and frighten herself on the way to an urgent case! To us normal daily motoring is done at 5/10ths, increased to 6/10ths over familiar roads, and to 7/10ths when driving for enjoyment on a fine day. Above that we will be at 8/10ths but to a racing driver this will constitute his 5/10ths and in a race he will have the ability to maintain 8/10ths, or if a top F1 driver, go to 9/10ths or even 10/10ths, on a qualifying lap, for example.

This should be a pointer, remembering that the above assessments take into account the type of car being driven and how driver ability differs. Will this be taken into consideration when a charge of dangerous driving is being contemplated? Greatly increased penalties for jumping a traffic light (as distinct from blatantly crossing on the red) and for momentarily crossing a forbidden white line may become the norm. We hope the motoring organisations are fighting as hard as did would be Prime Ministers for our interests and fair play. Different political parties regard the motor car in different ways and if driving is your main enjoyment you might ask your MP what his views are.

The IAM examination is a tough test of motoring skills, yet we know of a candidate whose examiner asked if he would like to pull in while he was doing 30 mph in a town, because a fierce hailstorm had commenced. Having come through two such storms at twice the speed, on his way to take the test, the driver under scrutiny elected to continue — another example of how even very experienced people can view driving competence quite differently! Not every Panda driver has had your experience and while authority views smooth tyres and defective handbrakes as highly dangerous, it gives no bonus for 4WD, anti-lock brakes, or the good handling of high performance cars. You can light a cigarette, use a car ‘phone, park every night outside your house without paying any extra tax, even on narrow congested roads. But exceed an antiquated limit by a few mph, or overtake smartly, and it may cost you a heavy fine and in future even your licence. You have been warned! You may soon be on the spot. Nevertheless, Motor Sport wishes its readers a Happy Christmas and a summons-free New Year.

You may also like

Related products