Editorial, January 2000

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

When I asked Gordon Murray to sketch out his Formula One car of future, drawn without reference to a rulebook, I expected exactly that, a sketch. As you will have seen, what we actually got was rather better than that.

Gordon Murray stopped designing F1 cars when he felt the rulebook had finally become too thick and this, coupled with his drawings, suggest to me there are two sorts of race car designer. On the one hand, there are the free-thinkers, the Murrays of this world, men not constrained by the traditional confines of the human imagination. And then there are the details men, the Adrian Neweys to whom regulations are a bonus because their ability is to exploit what’s laid down by others better than anyone else. Whose is the greater talent? I’m not in a position to judge as both seem fairly proficient at securing championships for their employers. But if you want a drawing to frame and hang on your wall, you’ll go a long way before finding one more interesting and thought provoking than Gordon’s.

The good news is not only can you have a high quality print of Gordon’s drawing, but it will also come from a run of just 500, signed exclusively for Motor Sport’s readers by the man himself. And all you need to do is subscribe or renew your subscription to Motor Sport and we will send you the signed print free of charge. Full details are on page 70 and, if you’re swift, you’ll get one.

While on the subject of F1’s future, I managed to have a long chat with Gerhard Berger at a recent BMW dinner and he was illuminating about the chances of both his team and those of his rivals. His aim for 2000 is for the BMW-Williams to match the results of the 1999 Supertec car. The first win will be 2001. In the meantime Ford has the best engine in F1, but he doubts the ability ofJaguar’s drivers, particularly Irvine, to develop the car.

He reckons Ralf Schumacher is one of the best drivers but he lacks the focus of his brother and will never be as good as a result. He enjoyed Zanardi’s company but admits he failed to do the job in 1999. He says McLaren will claim the title next year and Villeneuve is wasting his best years at BAR. Winning Le Mans in 1999 was no more than a job to be done and he will never take part in another car race. Thought you might like to know.

You will notice a rather forward-working nature to the magazine this month. Given the date, I thought it a legitimate exercise. My thanks to those who went on the record about how Fl should be in the future and to you for your on-going loyalty to this magazine. We wish you all the best for the new season and hope you will continue to share your enthusiasm for this great sport with us.