Letters, January 2017

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Group B reality check

Thank you for your evocative article on Group B rallying, published in the December 2016 issue.

It may be implicit, but your article seems to suggest that banning these cars was a bit of an over-reaction. It should be remembered, however, that in the space of little more than 12 months three competitors (Bettega, Toivonen and Marc Surer’s co-driver Michael Wyder) had died and two more (Ari Vatanen and Surer himself) had suffered serious injuries. None of this had anything to do with lack of spectator control. I was working for the marketing department of Martini at the time and vividly remember a sense of doom and urgency pervading the rallying community. It was not unlike Imola 1994: something had to be done.

Jurriaan Tas, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Swede dreams

Aside from Mr Roebuck’s own consistent good sense, I think his reporting of the views of Stefan Johansson in the December 2016 issue represented the most obviously level-headed assessment of and prescription for Formula 1 that I have read in many a year. We are tantalised by the prospect of Ross Brawn
re-entering the ‘sport’ in some role that would involve serious, sensible, informed, calm but autocratic control and if that were to occur surely he could do worse than pick up Mr Johansson’s manifesto and implement it completely.

I would be pretty surprised if
Ross were not a reader of Motor Sport, so how about it, Mr Brawn and
Liberty Media? Go on, surprise us all and lift what is supposed to be the pinnacle of motor sport from its slough of despond!

To round off my shopping list, could we have Stefan Johansson’s impersonation of Nigel Mansell on a podcast?

John Harrison, London SW3 

Rim with a view

I was interested to read the comments by Stefan Johansson regarding steering wheels. I have attached a couple of pictures of the actual steering wheel he used to take third place in the 1989 Portuguese Grand Prix with Onyx.

Note the absence of any buttons at all! The plaque was placed on the wheel by the team, who donated it to a charity event I attended some years ago.

At one stage in the race Martini led in a Minardi – it never happened again!

Mike Seary, Kenley, Surrey

Sorry, wrong number

In the November edition of Motor Sport there is a note that says that Stirling Moss was driving a Lotus 24 when he crashed at Goodwood in ’62. It was actually a Lotus 18/21 modified to accept the Climax V8. I saw his penultimate race in that car at Snetterton, mechanical problems meant he did not feature in the results. In typical Stirling style, however, he set fastest lap of the race in his outdated car against the likes of Jimmy Clark in the Lotus 24 and Graham Hill in a BRM.

John Hindle, Penshurst, Kent

Lincoln continental

I am a long-time reader and supporter of MS; always will be, so please keep it up.

I wanted to express my appreciation for the Guy Martin article about the Triumph Land Speed Record programme in the States. I really enjoy a writing style that just drips with concise authenticity, while also allowing his Lincolnshire DNA to show through. I find he picks out and lets us in on the significant aspects very well.

A good call that complements the rest of the magazine really well.

Gary Drew, Brighton, E Sussex

Roamin’ holiday

Every October we visit Italy as a group on our motorbikes and over the years have retraced nearly all the Mille Miglia sections of note, but one spot had eluded me every time – the site of the 1957 de Portago crash and the memorial to the victims killed alongside the Spaniard and his co-driver Ed Nelson.

We had ridden past it every year, but this time I managed to find it; it is easily missed as it is hidden in a small copse of trees on a lethal stretch of single carriageway crowded with heavy goods trucks and no pull-in available.

The easy reference point is the Stanguellini (the same company that produced the race cars, I believe) factory and showroom on the left as you leave Guidizzolo on the 236, towards Mantova. Keep an eye out on your right for the small well-trimmed copse and there it will be, hidden away. On a motorbike I could ride onto the site, but in a car you are going to need to park up and walk from a distance, or definitely risk losing the a door.

On this trip we always visit Castel d’Ario to see the Nuvolari bronze celebrating his birthplace.

And the next village along is Bonferraro, the birthplace of Antonio Ascari. Is there something in the water around there?

Neil Leigh, Spa Belgium

Get back to tradition

As a 28-year veteran of the Brands Hatch Formula Ford Festival, I (and many others of like mind) have become very frustrated with the management of the safety car. Its deployment was seemingly triggered by someone in West Kingsdown merely sneezing, such was its frequency. How will aspiring racers learn etiquette, racecraft and respect for others when they are not even required to be responsible for their own safety? I’m not suggesting safety should be anything other than the prime focus, but racers used to have to avoid hazards such as stricken cars and adjust their driving accordingly. 

Owain Linford, Milton Keynes, Bucks 

Cut to the chase

I believe most enthusiasts would agree that the abuse of run-off areas in modern F1 is a complete nonsense. This subject has been discussed and well reasoned by others more qualified than I, but the bottom line is surely that any lack of judgment, whether intentional or not, must in any credible sport be penalised. Imagine tennis without boundary limitations.

I have a suggestion that might solve this problem and provide an immediate and visible penalty. Each car would be fitted with a GPS-driven device or, failing that, a signal wire buried in the ground that, having detected a predetermined deviation from the margins of the track, would automatically cut that car’s engine power by 50 per cent for a period of five seconds or whatever time was deemed appropriate. Full power would subsequently be restored. This would have the effect of a virtual gravel trap without any danger of the car rolling, getting stuck in a vulnerable position or, heaven forbid, reducing the field for any reason other than pure racing incidents or mechanical woes. 

Chris Snell, Fulking, West Sussex

Snakes and ladders

I was saddened to hear the news of the passing of Chris Amon and Jack Sears. My memory of these two dates back to the Guards Trophy meeting at Brands Hatch in 1964 when Jack, the established sports and touring car ace, was locked in battle with the up-and-coming Grand Prix driver, both in those brutish AC Cobras. A truly magnificent sight and a wonderful memory of these two great drivers.

Peter Haynes, Needingworth cum Holywell. 

’Ring of confidence

One of Nigel Roebuck’s recent articles prompted me to send you pictures of the original programmes of some of the events I attended during my time in the RAF, the most poignant of which was the 1957 German GP (left). It was very special indeed, watching the maestro Juan Manuel Fangio looking so relaxed.

I’ve also had the good fortune to have raced there with my wife and son in our Cooper-MG sports prototype, Cooper Bobtail and Clubmans Mallock.

They call it the best circuit in the world – and it’s most certainly the most difficult to learn. 

George Cooper, Kilsyth, Glasgow

Strictly Combe dancing

I was a little surprised to see no mention of the Castle Combe Autumn Classic in December’s edition of Motor Sport. A lovely day of wonderful motoring, not spoiled by the pretty inclement weather.

However, the large number of Motor Sport umbrellas and baseball caps that were on display showed that the day was well attended by some of your readers. I would certainly recommend a visit in 2017.

Ian Wilson, via email

It isn’t possible to cover every historic race meeting in the magazine – much as we’d like to – but a report and pictures from Castle Combe appeared on our website, www.motorsportmagazine.com

The flipside of halos

I am surprised it hasn’t been argued that the halo head protection will make Formula 1 more dangerous. We are told that a driver will have something like 20 per cent less risk of head injury in an accident with a halo fitted. Let’s accept that. Virtually all the accidents that may cause head injury are the result of drivers being too brave and aggressive. Aren’t they going to be 20 per cent more aggressive with the halo? I think so.

Then add on all the other hazards of halos, from slowing egress in a fire to caving in on drivers in rollover accidents. We might never know because this type of accident is so rare, and the sport will evolve, but it is pretty obvious the halo won’t make it safer.

Patrick Irwin, Port Melbourne, Australia