THE SIDE-VALVE ALVIS

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

THE SIDE-VALVE ALVIS

Sir,

I was interested in the reference made by the writer of the June ” General Notes ” to the old side-valve Alvis 12 h.p.—which he calls a ” 12-50.”

As the owner of one of these cars, of the ’24 vintage, might I be allowed to comment that the Alvis Company always appear to have referred to this car as a ” 1240,” whilst only the o.h.v. engine was expected to do the work of fifty horses. I have always been very interested in both the ” 12-40 ” and the ” 12-50.” Even the Side-valve engine could Make most other 12 h.p. jobs look sick when it was ten years old, and withal it did a very easy 30 m.p.g. under all sorts

of conditions. Incidentally I have the old Zenith vertical carburetter on my engine, whereas the makers fitted a Solex. The induction passages were for the most part inside the block, but a small external aluminium casting formed a rather good hot spot, which was rather interesting in that a portion of the exhaust gas was brought in a small pipe round the rear of the engine, through the hot spot and thence down to a tiny little aluminium silencer of its own by the side of the sump. The engine Would always start exceptionally easily and has never given a ha’porth of mechanical trouble in the whole of its life, even when it was

neglected for two years at a time. It once started with six turns of the handle after standing unused for six months. The crankcase, sump, crankshaft—in fact, everything except the block and head are interchangeable between the

” 12-40 ” and the ” 12-50.” The sidevalve eagine has a fixed head, with brass plugs over the tops of the valves, so that the valves could be ground in with no trouble at all.

The side-valve engine would rev, up to about 4,000 r.p.m., representing a road speed of about 75 m.p.h. theoretically, although I have never done this myself, having had the carburetter set too fine for high maximum speeds. The ” 12-50 “uses slightly more juice and revs. up to 4,500 r.p.m., hence the greater h.p. and better all out maximum. I have a 4.5 axle with which the ” 12-50 ” will do nearly 90 m.p.h. on paper, but a normal touring body makes such a ratio give the tar a feeling of being under-powered.

It is very easy to replace a s.v. engine with an o.h.v., by fitting a different exhaust system and shortening one radiator connection. Everything else is the same. I have done this myself, though I must admit my car is very definitely non-standard by tow. I am, Yours etc.,

R. K. MATTERsoN. Rochdale.