A Mathis for Standard

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Sir,

Perhaps I can enlighten your contributor concerning the Mathis/Standard rumour. I was for many years with the late B. S. Marshall, being responsible for the preparation of all his racing cars, including Bugatti, Aston Martin, Hampton and Mathis. At this particular time we were concessionaires for the Mathis marque. It is true that we supplied the Standard Motor Co. with the car and I, personally, collected it—an open 4-seater tourer, light blue—from Strasbourg, and some time afterwards Standard Motor Company bought it; we were asked to repurchase it, which we did.

As you can imagine I watched all developments of their design with interest and I can say with every confidence that the only observable alteration on the Standard Motor Co. design was introducing a side-valve engine in lieu of the open push-rod type previously fitted to their range of light cars. Whether this was due to Mathis influence is debatable. It is a fact that all manufacturers do buy specimen cars for examination. In very few instances do they make a slavish copy, but what they learn is added to the sum of experience and I can only think of one classic case where the exact copy was made.

I am not aware of any particular reason why the news of this acquisition leaked out and perhaps this information will kill the rumour that the Standard 9 h.p. was an exact copy.

The car in question was an 8 h.p. 4-cylinder (M.Y.) and shortly. after its introduction a 6-cylinder model was introduced known as the E.M.Y.6. It had an engine similar to the 4-cylinder but with the addition of two cylinders of the same size as the 4-cylinder, with the same body and an engine designed more for torque with minimum ability to rev. It was a car with a very good top-gear performance but did not sell very well.

H.G. Munton,
Works Supt., Boon & Porter Ltd.
Barnes.