Editorial, July 2002

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

It was the charmlessness of it. Just imagine if junior partner Barrichello had swerved aside to allow the catalyst of the team’s renaissance his just deserts after four barren seasons.

True, Schumacher was the catalyst behind the renaissance of Ferrari, but that was over six years and 40 victories ago. Now he is the key component at the hub of a Big Red Machine. Surely such monotonous success should have cut him enough slack to do the decent thing in Austria and allow Banichello his just deserts? Instead, it seems to have fuelled his and Ferrari’s paranoia. They might not think it at the time, but a dose of inconsistency would do them no harm.

For me, Schumacher’s greatness does not lie with his win tally, the victories being so numerous now that they are beginning to blend, but in the fact that he has been ‘on it’ for every lap of his Formula One career. First out of the pits on a Friday, he storms by as if on a qualifying lap. And should he abort one of the latter, he rampages into the pits as Wit’s the most important thing he has ever done. And he has done so for 10 years. Not for him the gradual throttling back of a Lauda or a Prost; Schiunacher’s experience has only served to make him faster, push harder.

But at no stage has he stepped back and taken in the bigger picture. He has little interest in or knowledge of the history of the sport, which is a shame because it means he has been unable to put himself into context

He doesn’t need to win another championship to be remembered as a great. What would add to the sheen, however, are some flashes of magnanimity. For it’s sad that a handful of moments of madness will be remembered far longer than the majority of his victories.

We could perhaps just about forgive him Adelaide 1994, when he was scrapping tooth and nail for his first world title; Jerezgate ’97 less so, although he and Ferrari were still in the first flush of their relationship; and certainly not Austria this season. On each occasion he has had a split second in which to wrestle with his conscience. On each occasion that overwhelming need to dominate, to win, has won out.

A Fangio-beating sixth title — his fifth is surely assured — must be tempting. But instead he could take the opportunity of his fifdi to bow out stylishly, avoid fanning the inevitable ‘Of course, he was never as good as Fangio’. And should his fire still bum, an Indianapolis 500 or Le Mans victory would add far more to his lustre. As Mansell discovered in 1993, there is life outside F1. His ‘enforced’ Indycar title brought him more satisfaction and approbation than a season battling and bickering with Prost at Williams ever would have.

And a Ferrari without Schuey, meanwhile, would allow the sport’s most important team time to reflect on its context, too.

You may also like

Related products