Matters of moment, July 2015

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Current page

197

Current page

198

Current page

199

Current page

200

Current page

201

Current page

202

Current page

203

Current page

204

Current page

205

Current page

206

Current page

207

Current page

208

Current page

209

Current page

210

Current page

211

Current page

212

Current page

213

Current page

214

Current page

215

Current page

216

Audience surveys have to be a good thing. I know, because we run them from time to time here at Motor Sport. It’s always helpful to know more about the people you are talking to. But how much influence should they have over the strategy of any given business? Should my approach to this job be directly dictated by the results of a poll? I don’t think so. In fact, I’d consider it a personal failing if I was genuinely surprised by the clear trends the answers might throw up. I shouldn’t need a survey to tell me what our readers want – and the same applies to Formula 1 and its fans.

In my experience, surveys tend to confirm what is already known about an audience, and I’d predict the same will be the case when the two entirely separate F1 fan questionnaires – one most commendably launched by the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association – report back with their findings.

Let’s face it, identifying how F1 is failing its fans right now is hardly difficult. Just glance the readers’ comments on our website each day. Or turn to page 150 in this magazine and see what Mark Webber thinks. The problems are blindingly obvious. Solving them – that’s the hard part, although we had a pretty good stab at it more than a year ago when Grand Prix editor Mark Hughes presented our ‘manifesto for a revolution’ (April 2014 issue).

Again, ideas are relatively easy, as the laughably named F1 Strategy Group highlighted so consummately during May. A shame almost everything they came up with smacked of reactionary, knee-jerk panic with little consideration for the consequences (see Mark’s column on p26) – but how else should we expect a bunch of self-interested multi-millionaires with unmatched collective experience of motor racing to run their sport…?

On the day they met, I happened to be at Goodwood House and took the opportunity to ask an impartial but informed observer – and genuine racing fan – for his thoughts on ‘the F1 problem’. Lord March understands what it takes to impart a vision successfully to a mass audience. He made a couple of helpful observations.

“The debate about whether you give the customers what they want or try to steer them in the direction they might want to go in is an interesting one,” he said. “I don’t believe in necessarily doing endless research and thinking ‘they all want it black, so I’ll do it black’. I think you need to do what you believe in, but then also be flexible.”

It would have been unfair of me to expect his definitive vision for the future of F1. But Lord March did offer an interesting parallel that gets to the nub of why Grand Prix racing is in its current plight. “Take horse racing, which I’m in a position to tell you about,” he said. “There are far too many stakeholders and there is no one saying this is how it’s going to be and how we want it. Horse racing in Britain is very pure, well organised and straight. In other countries it is less so. Betting is important globally, so therefore we need to get British horse racing around the world in a way that we haven’t managed to do, and actually in the manner Grand Prix racing has. Everyone is fighting their corner: the Horseman’s Group, the Jockey Club, the British Horseracing Authority, the bookmakers who are very powerful… So it gets completely diluted.”

Sound familiar? Instead of trying to ‘fix’ F1, the Strategy Group would have served motor racing better at Biggin Hill by indulging in a moment of introspection: to consider how they as stakeholders – the top teams, FOM, the FIA, plus the promotional rights holder and the engine manufacturers – have a management structure that can never govern without the conflict of self-interest. Before jumping into the merits of refuelling, more downforce and so on, they might have considered how they should devolve this failed governance and consider why F1 keeps tying itself in knots, year after year.

Before anything else should be considered, including the results of well-intentioned fan surveys, F1 must face up to its real crisis: its lack of true leadership.

Bernie Ecclestone? Once upon a time – 40, 30, even 20 years ago – he was the guiding light behind a brilliantly cohesive vision of how he thought F1 should be. But now he’s an increasingly irrelevant liability. The FIA? Infamously, it absolved itself of responsibility under Max Mosley, and current president Jean Todt shows no appetite to claim it back. So who will? And how? With no clear answer to that question, and more alarmingly no collective recognition that it’s a headache screaming for a remedy, Grand Prix racing will continue to lurch, without a clearly defined strategy, from one daft rules edict to the next.

Luckily, when you think about it, it’s only motor racing.

The appetite for motor sport movies and cinematic documentaries is apparently insatiable. In the wake of intriguing news that Robert De Niro is preparing to play Enzo Ferrari in a biopic, two factual films have broken cover in the past month. One I have seen, the other I’m looking forward to.

Lauda: The Untold Story is a new Austrian documentary, which promises much with such a title. Niki Lauda’s tale was hardly obscure before Ron Howard’s sensational – and deeply flawed – Rush, so can this film deliver on that promise?

In truth, to most readers of this magazine, revelations will hardly come thick and fast. But with Lauda’s full blessing and involvement through new interviews, it can at least claim to be definitive. Inevitably, the story begins and pivots around the Nürburgring accident that would change his life. The archive footage of Guy Edwards, Harald Ertl, Art Merzario, Brett Lunger, John Watson and others tending to Niki at the side of the track can never be anything other than deeply unsettling, but Heinz Prüller’s live TV phone interview with Lauda’s mother, as her son fights for his life in hospital, is even more so.

But there are lighter moments, too.

A pre-shunt career monologue from Lauda, in a suitably alpine setting while stroking a cow and chopping wood, is charming, while his guide to a naked 1977 Ferrari 312T2, while sitting in its snug tub, is the sort of TV feature Sky and BBC producers would kill for today.

An awful Americanised voiceover, a constant ‘muzakal’ backwash and an irrelevant second half, involving promo films featuring Nico Rosberg, remove some of the shine. But it’s worth seeing for the excellent period film, if nothing else. Catch it in cinemas for one night only across the UK on July 2, or on DVD from July 6.

The other documentary due for a cinema release is Steve McQueen: The Man and Le Mans, which promises the unseen back story to the most celebrated racing movie of them all. The cult of

Le Mans has been a little over-exposed in the past few years, but you only have to revisit the incredible action footage of Ferrari 512s and Porsche 917s to understand why. Now this film, which is the brainchild of former Motor Sport writer Andrew Marriott, offers fresh insight into its troubled birth. Following its debut in Cannes, the documentary is due for release in November. Before then, Andrew has promised to tell us more about the project, so watch this space.

Damon Hill and Derek Bell will be star guests when John Surtees hosts his annual charity karting day at Brooklands on June 30. Hill will demonstrate the Lotus 32B with which Jim Clark won the Tasman Series 50 years ago, while former Team Surtees driver Bell will take a run in the TS7 he drove to sixth place in the 1970 US GP.

The Henry Surtees Foundation, created in honour of his late son, remains the prime driving force in John’s life and the British motor racing community always rallies to support the day. As usual, we’ll be there (getting in the way of proper racing drivers).

Care to join us? If so, email [email protected] for more details of how to enter a team.