Doug Nye

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Sometimes trying to present the truth of a bygone event, much more so of a bygone project, can become tricky as one tries to reconcile sometimes conflicting accounts from witnesses, judging what memories truly reflect bygone deeds. Occasionally one gets it wrong. Does it matter? For most writers, perhaps, as long as it’s made a good story, nah – not really…

But for those of us who really care about this peripheral historical stuff, of course it matters. That’s one reason why I can spend years trying to get a book manuscript right (yet still, in some details, fail) and why this month I’ll offer some additional input on my Cosworth 4-wheel-drive story in the April issue. It needs it.

We always seek the accuracy that this magazine’s knowledgeable readership expect, and fortunately many of you have worked right there at the true coalface of motor racing endeavour – and really help. Alastair Lyle was a Cosworth draughtsman and project engineer from 1967-79. He produced many of the detailed drawings from which the components of former McLaren designer Robin Herd’s 4WD F1 car were manufactured. Uniquely, to offset the added weight of the 4WD transmission, the Cosworth used one of the company’s 3-litre DFV V8 engines for which the block and heads had been cast not in the standard aluminium, but in lightweight magnesium. Alastair recalls: “It always had low oil pressure as the block and sump were cast from the standard aluminium pattern equipment. Magnesium is lighter, but has the same strength-to-weight ratio, so you will need a larger section for the magnesium main bearing housings to get the same strength as if they had been aluminium. The thick-wall main bearing shells expanded the magnesium housing more than the aluminium one, resulting in chronic lower oil pressure.

“The car also started out with Hewland/ZF type limited differentials at both ends, which proved to be horribly snatchy at the front, which gave it the nasty handling described by Mike Costin. As a first attempt to cure it, we did run a test with a free front diff, which cured the wandering on the straights and also made braking into corners stable with no intermittent front wheel locking after the brakes were applied. Sadly, when the car tried to accelerate hard out of corners, it would then try to spin its inside front wheel and lose traction, which was self-defeating. So the free diff experiment was abandoned – after which we tried a Salisbury ‘Powr-Lok’ diff as it had a more progressive action than the cam-and-pawl ZF type. It was better, but not good enough…

“If Cosworth didn’t build the second 4WD F1 tub, then who did?”

“I think that Keith [Duckworth] actually designed three different ratios for the torque-splitting diff, mounted on the gearbox. There was a 40:60 front/rear torque split as a starter, and then he also did 35:65 and 30:70. It was a six-speed gearbox, and the transmission was fully dry sumped, which was unusual for that era, but good for minimising transmission losses. We used Hewland gears for the pump.

“I don’t ever remember a 20:80 torque split for the Cosworth car, but Matra had one on their 4WD MS84, which Jackie Stewart tested, but decided he would rather have a 0:100 split – rear-wheel drive alone.”

“Trevor Taylor did much of the testing. He wasn’t impressed. We told him that if it might rain he should drive it slowly back. He said that if it rained he’d park the thing and walk back.”

I had mentioned that the six-spoke cast-alloy Cosworth wheel design later became familiar on Robin Herd’s March cars. Alastair Lyle: “March wheels are not identical to the DKD Cosworth ones. On the inside the March drive pegs are in line with the spokes while the Cosworth pegs were between them…”

He also contends that while two Cosworth 4WD entities survive today, only one tub “…was ever made in the Cosworth workshops, as also confirmed by John Thompson, who built it and did all the fabrication. The original car was sold to Tom Wheatcroft after the project was cancelled, and all the spares went with it. The second tub was made by the engineers Crosthwaite & Gardiner, built up from factory parts, according to Bill Brown. This car was in the York Museum in Perth (Western Australia).”

Dick Crosthwaite confirms that Peter Briggs “…bought a load of Cosworth bits from Wheatie and asked us to assemble them into the second car – as a non-runner – for his York Museum. His bits included wishbones and castings, uprights and transmission bits, many of them un-machined. But there was also a part-completed monocoque chassis. We certainly did not build it.” In fact I recall that second tub in Tom’s ownership when we were putting the Donington Collection together. We understood it to be either a Cosworth pilot for the one-off ‘proper job’, or the basis of a second team car for 1969-70 had the car shown promise. And if John Thompson didn’t build it at Cosworth then who did?

Once one starts a project, and then digs deeper – as many questions emerge as  do answers. And that, of course, is what Cosworth discovered when it began testing the 4WD car back in 1969…


Doug Nye is the UK’s leading motor racing historian and has been writing authoritatively about the sport since the 1960s

 

You may also like

Related products