Cortina comments

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

I have in some quarters been accused of being unkind to the Cortina, latest small Ford from Dagenham. This model is selling in large numbers, as I predicted it would, for it is essentially a car for the people, as its display at the Geneva Show alongside a model-T symbolised. But I hoped that readers of Motor Sport might prefer more advanced and exciting engineering, as exemplified by the Morris 1100 and M.G. 1100 cars. The Morris 1100 that I have on extended trial having settled down to be an extremely enjoyable, comfortable and safe form of transport, about which I intend to write in some detail when I have driven it 10,000 miles.

Some critics of my comments on the Cortina quote from an article in The Guardian, by J. R. L. Anderson, who seems to have had one of these 1,198 c.c. Fords for a six-month’s test. He writes glowingly of his experiences, but he covered only 2,484 miles. I intend to approach Ford of Dagenham about an equally extended test of a Cortina, and would expect to go considerably further than this in a trial of similar duration. I note that this Cortina averaged only 27.9 m.p.g. and it does appear to be a thirsty car for its engine size—in the recent Mobil Economy Run the highest placed Cortina gave 39.17 m.p.g., whereas five cars in its class, comprising two Morris 1100, two M.G.s 1100 and a Wolseley 1500, all achieved figures of better than 41 m.p.g. the class-winning M.G. 1100 recording 44.61 m.p.g.

Strength is also lent to my contention that the Cortina 1200 is a good, saleable, but by no means outstanding car by some data, arranged pictorially, which The Motor included in its edition of April 3rd, when comparing five cars in the up-to-1,200 c.c. class. This showed that on maximum speed the order of merit was Renault R8, Morris 1100, Triumph Herald 1200, Ford Cortina and Volkswagen, on fuel consumption Morris 1100, R8, Herald, with Cortina and VW far inferior, on 0-50 m.p.h. acceleration R8, Herald, Morris 1100, with Cortina far behind, VW last, and on 20-40 m.p.h. top-gear acceleration Herald, Morris 1100, R8, with Cortina and VW a long way behind. Which seems to vindicate my views on Ford Consul Cortina versus Morris 1100, and I am glad to see that more and more of these advanced-design, all-independently-rubber-sprung f.w.d. cars, almost pugnaciously confident, are appearing on the road.—W. B.