VIEWS ON VOLVOS

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

VIEWS ON VOLVOS

Sir,

Having noted the letter from Mr. Kane, I feel that it would be unfair not to make some reply. I also bought a 121 Volvo new in August 1965 and have covered to date 26,000 miles. At this mileage the engine seems quite nicely run in and the whole vehicle has many more years’ wear in it. Of course no car is perfect and indeed all current cars from Rolls-Royce to B.M.C. are really engineered concoctions made up of specialist manufacturers’ parts. The only part for which the manufacturers can take much credit generally is the standard of body finish and assembly. In this instance in my view the Volvo is one Of the best produced cars at present on the market in this price range and I say this having driven since 1931 quite a large number of different vehicles. Faults on my Volvo to date have been one faulty stop-lamp switch and that is all.

Mr. Kane complains of the noise from the suspension after a rebuild, and as to this, of course, it seems he must blame the servicing agents and not the manufacturers. I have some sympathy over this.

Penarth. D. BARKSBIRE. Sir,

Like many other Volvo owners I read Mr. Gerry Kane’s letter with some surprise. Following several second-hand cars I bought a new B.M.C. 1.5 in 1959 complete with its quota of jammed doors, pitted chrome and atrocious cornering habits. (Well sir, they are mass produced). . . . A replacement engine and two clutches later I recalled MOTOR SPORT’S glowing report On its visit to the Volvo factory and bought a new 122S in 1961. Workmanship, finish, performance and reliability were all there. I was impressed and there followed a 1963 P1800 and in 1965 a P1800S and must have covered about 90,000 miles in them without a let-down. The 122S needed a tired rear coil spring replacing and the two sports each had back axles replaced because they were noisy; this under warranty.

None of the cars has given any engine trouble whatsoever and they seem to thrive on hard work. Tappet adjustment must be regular if excessive noise is to be avoided but this must apply to all cars with similar engine design. The only quarrel I have with Volvo is their disappointing lack of originality in the 144 styling. Perhaps Mr. Kane’s troubles would disappear with a good mechanic.

[Name and address supplied—ED.] ” Volvophile.”

[This correspondence is now closed; I was dealing with the outdated 144S and have had much admiration for the earlier Volvos, in their day—ED.