Letters from Readers, October 1974

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Seat-belts

Sir,

I feel I must continue the seat belt controversy with my own experiences and views. Two years ago I rolled over an MG Midget at about 70 m.p.h. with my wife as passenger. Needless to say, the soft top was no protection whatsoever, as it was worn away by the road. We were not wearing seat belts and were both pushed under the dashboard. Our injuries were minimal and we sustained only cuts and bruises.

Had we been wearing seat belts I would not be writing you this letter as we would, of course, have remained in an upright position and would probably have been decapitated, a view incidentally, shared by the Police attending the accident.

When discussing details of accidents with other people, the subject of seat belts usually crops up, and there seem to be many cases of similar circumstances, i.e. people who might have been much more seriously injured had they been wearing seat belts. Also, I have not yet met anyone who can actually claim to have been saved by a seat belt.

Don’t take this to mean I disagree with seat belts, but please let’s have the decision left to people’s own discretion. As the House of Lords and the Editor obviously realise, by making the wearing of seat belts compulsory the law would be strapping some drivers into a death chair.

Satisfied Reader

[Name and address supplied]

[I was thrown out of an Allard at a pre-war speed hill-climb, the cockpit of which was crushed. Verb. sap.—Ed.]

* * *

Beauties or Beasts?

Sir

As a regular reader of Motor Sport I always admire the excellent colour photos in your centre spread, and I often mentally comment to myself how aesthetically attractive some of the current crop of Formula 1 cars are, and conversely how ugly others are.

My personal opinion as to the most attractive some of the current crop of Formula BT44. I wonder what other readers’ opinions may be.

Nairobi.

F E. Walker

* * *

Big Brother is Watching You

Sir,

May I first thank you for publishing such a splendid magazine whether it be made of glossy paper or “comic” paper, after all it is only the contents which are important. As a relatively new reader (I have only been reading Motor Sport for 10 years, since I was 13), I must congratulate you on your 50th birthday and may you continue to a ripe old age. I feel I must put pen to paper on two subjects, one to join the moaners and the other to ask for assistance.

The first is the police control over the stretch of “motorway” at my back door – the two lane M5. Not content with the normal Motorway patrol cars, the police now use unmarked white BMWs to catch the unsuspecting motorist who may stray over the 70 m.p.h. speed limit. I thought this was a dastardly dirty deed until, a month ago, I noticed a helicopter flying approximately 150 ft. above my house (200 yards from the Motorway). At first I suspected surveyors for the proposed M42, until I noticed it now comes every day and passes over sometimes every quarter of an hour. I always thought the minimum legal height was 500 ft., but then I suppose the policeman/co-pilot would not be able to see the registration number through binoculars (yes he is that low); now on top of this, recently announced with great fervour on all the local news, the police are to use VASCAR. Thank goodness I drive a 1959 Citroen 2CV which cannot reach the 70 m.p.h. limit. The poor unsuspecting motorist! (Incidently I can just reach 55 m.p.h. on a flat road and average 62 m.p.g)

My second subject is the BSA front wheel drive cars of 1934-1939, these were advanced vehicles in many ways, with their front wheel drive and independent front suspension. Can any person offer advice on the pretty little 10 h.p. series 5 coupe built 1938? Fortunately the BSA owners’ club have forwarded me some literature mainly on the chassis, but the coupe body of my car is in a sad state: photographs, drawings of the body would be appreciated and returned.

(Name and address supplied]

[We have heard of someone being convicted for momentarily using the third lane of the M4 while towing a trailer, on evidence supplied by a helicopter pilot! Which political party will use part of its election manifesto to promise drivers decent immunity from such unwanted and expensive Big Brothers?—Ed.]

* * *

The Castrol Morgan

Sir,

I would like to endorse your comments concerning the Castrol 75th anniversary exhibition and particularly with regard to the Brooklands paddock scene which included a Morgan Three-Wheeler.

It is regrettable that in this case Messrs. Castrol found themselves unable to take up an offer, made at their request in the first instance, of a really genuine exhibit in the form of the Morgan raced by Clive Lones over the late twenties and early thirties, and featured in your publication “The Vintage Years of the Morgan Three-Wheeler”.

In this day and age it is increasingly difficult to isolate the genuine from the synthetic and Motor Sport is to be congratulated on its never-ending vigil in this respect.

We in the Morgan Three-Wheeler Club know of the whereabouts of all three cars which competed successfully in the 1933 and 1934 LCC Relay Race at Brooklands and portrayed in your aforementioned history.

I only hope that one day we shall be able to arrange to bring this team together again so that genuine students of “Morgan Mania” will be able to appreciate them.

In conclusion we should not be to hard on Castrol’s attempt at self congratulation, for their support to the Sport and Motor Clubs in general would be sorely missed.

Glastonbury.

N. H. Lear

Hon. Sec., Morgan Three-Wheeler Club

* * *

Correction

Sir,

In your August issue you published a letter I sent you about the 1903 Peugeot. Unfortunately there was a very small misprint which spoiled the effect of one sentence. I wrote: “I loved that car, because it was the first I drove alone at the age of eight and you printed at the age of eighteen (18) which made no sense.

Fact is, at that age 18 I was driving a 5 h.p. Le Zebre to and from observation posts in front of Verdun and other unpleasant places with an artillery officer.

Experienced drivers were scarce in 1917, and I was one!

During wars, driving licences could be obtained at age 16.

Always glad to get Motor Sport, although motoring is losing much of its charm nowadays.

Blessac, France.

C. Jorrand

* * *

Viva Defended

Sir,

I rarely write to motoring magazines, usually preferring to sit back and read about other peoples problems, etc. But Mr. Fletcher’s letter on Vauxhalls has made me put pen to paper.

Just because he has been unfortunate enough to have had trouble with one of his fleet of Vauxhall Vivas, he advises would-be buyers to think again. Why, may I ask, apart from the feeble reasons he gives, did he change from BLMC in the first place?

As for the long delay on parts for and parts missing from one of his new Vivas, if one casts one’s mind back one will recall that around October last year Vauxhall were hit by very bad industrial action, just when their new models were introduced. Mr. Fletcher was indeed lucky to get one Viva, let alone a fleet of them.

Regarding the account business, I can well understand the garage stipulating a minimum of £20 a month being spent before an account can be opened, (I would have thought that with a fleet of cars Mr. Fletcher would easily spend that amount each month on servicing alone).

He says nothing of the other Vivas he bought, so one presumes they are giving reasonable service.

I must admit I am biased, having owned three Vivas, starting with a 1967 HB. I now have a 1974 HC 1256, and can honestly say that, apart from regular servicing I have had only the minimum of repair work carried out.

So I say to anyone wanting a well-equipped, well finished value-for-money car look very closely at the Viva, compare it with the Escort etc. and it comes out very much on top.

Haslemere, Surrey.

C. Strudwick