For the trade or the enthusiast?

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Sir,

The Editor of The Motor—in a moment of true repentance, or of inspiration, or of aberration—published last week a letter from me criticising his journal for being “just another trade publication” with solely the interests of the trade, and not of the motoring public, at heart.

By every post since then I have received an astonishing “fan mail” from people all over the country commending my letter; and I think you should know that about 90% of these letters recommend me to read Motor Sport for fearless criticism of bad or inferior motor cars, of whatever origin.

As your annual subscription lists will show, I have been reading Motor Sport for many years, and I now have had great pleasure in forwarding the best of my “fan mail” making recommendations of it to the editor of The Motor. (But I do not think he will publish it, because he cut out a similar recommendation from my original letter before he printed it!) As I told him, your journal “goes deservedly from strength to strength.” Even so, I thought you might be pleased to hear that so many people are ready to write to a stranger recommending your paper and your policy.

R.G. Neville (Gp. Capt.).
Crowborough.