SIMON TAYLOR

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

SIMON TAYLOR I KNOW WE’RE AU, FED UP wrai MICHAEL Schumacher monotonously winning Fl races: but it’s still quite something that he tied up the title after barely 2000 of the season’s 3200 racing miles. It’s another Schuey record for the short-term statisticians to trumpet Of course, in 1952-53 Alberto Ascari’s Ferrari won every single championship race over a period of more than 12 months. But, in the context of modem Formula One, Schumacher’s run of success — nine wins, two seconds and a third in 12 races — is certainly a substantial achievement Post-race in France, his predictable speech of thanks to the whole Ferrari organisation was saved from being trite because it was visibly heart-felt And that’s just as it should be (although it’s hard to imagine, in the rather less touchy-feely atmosphere of 25 years ago, new champion Nild Lauda publicly telling his Ferrari mechanics that

he loved them). With today’s technology, the complex rolling design and development programmes and the endless testing, the 100 minutes or so of motor race each fortnight is merely the visible tip of a 24/7 iceberg. There is a veritable army of specialists who can take personal pride in Schumacher’s title, even if they’re not as well paid as he is.

So Schumacher’s real achievement is not just in winning the races. It’s in being the sharp end of a substantial organisation, whose multiple levels of personnel are all united in a single aim. Whatever their role, they all work towards giving him the car that his prodigious ability deserves. And the network extends beyond Maranello. Although Ferrari, unusually in Fl, builds its own engines, there are many loyal outside suppliers: chief of these is Bridgestone, who can take much credit for keeping Juan Montoya

at bay. (Japan is beating France handsomely in the tyre war. In fact, it has been suggested we should go back to having a single tyre manufacturer, in the interests of closer racing). So strong is the whole Ferrari effort that it’s easy to forget this is the same team which, pre-Schumacher, was deep in the doldrums. It’s oft quoted that Michael’s 2000 drivers’ championship was its first title for 21 years, since Jody Scheckter. Actually, Ferrari won the constructors’ championship in ’82, the tragic season that Gilles Villeneuve was killed, and Dither Pironi was dreadfully injured — when comfortably leading the drivers’ championship. In ’83, the Scuderia won it again, with Patrick Tambay and Rene Amoux. But the fact remains that, from ’91, for three long seasons, Ferrari won not a single race, and there were only singleton victories by attrition in ’94 and ’95. This was the once-great

institution that, after his Benetton triumphs, Schumacher set himself the goal of reviving. He succeeded not just because he is a great driver, but also because he is a great motivator. Persuading Ross Brawn and Rory Byrne to join him in the same enterprise was a major part of getting the job done. Down the years, some world champions have understood better than others the motivating role they can play towards the whole team. The first, Giuseppe Farina, was haughty and aloof, and regarded his mechanics as his oily servants. Fangio, by contrast, was devoid of snobbishness, and his teams always loved him, not only because he was courteous and goodhumoured, but because he was a winner. Different again was Jack Brabham who, more than any other champion before or since, was one of the lads. He was down among them on the Cooper shop floor building up his own cars, so that he knew every weld and bracket

As F 1 ‘s popularity grew, boosted by the universal medium of television, so the drivers became more aware of their own status. Some of them became more self-important Others kept their feet firmly on the ground. At Williams they still talk vvith affection about their first world champion, Alan Jones: a hard racer who called a spade a shovel, but had absolutely no side at all.

Anyone who was at McLaren during 1988-93 will tell you that, on the night before a GP, Ayrton Senna was often to be found in the garage at 9pm, still pondering his telemetry and talking through details with his mechanics. By contrast, Damon Hill was reckoned by his several of his Williams mechanics to be somewhat remote. But, whatever a driver’s personality, the workers in a team will always love a winner, and they will always admire hard graft Michael Schumacher scores 110 per cent on both counts. Now he has won his fifth title, and I’m already tired of being told that he has equalled Fangio’s total. As things stand at the moment, there seems little to prevent him from adding a sixth, or even a seventh, over the next couple of seasons, although for the health of Formula One I have to hope he won’t be able to crush the opposition so completely in future. If he does there will be no shortage of claims that

he is indubitably the best of all time, simply because he has won the most championships.

Well, I don’t need to remind you of my views about the emptiness of these comparisons across different generations of racing drivers. Schumacher is indubitably the greatest of his era, just as Senna and Jim Clark were of theirs. I don’t know how Fangio would have coped with a Ferrari F2002, although I’d love to see Schumacher in an Alfa Romeo 159. But the only two things that are the same about Fl then and now are the name of the formula, and number of wheels on the car (despite Ken Tyrrell’s efforts to change even that with the P34). The one statistic across the eras with which I have any patience and even then, not much is the percentage of wins to starts. Fangio won 24 of his 51 world championship rounds, a success rate of 47 per cent; and he started 56 per cent of his races from pole position. For Schumacher the figures are currently 35 per cent and 27 per cent Like most racers today, Schumacher was in karts almost as soon as he was out of nappies. Fangio learned his craft in those extraordinary long-distance races across the South American continent, like the Gran Premio del Norte: 6000 miles from Argentina through Bolivia to Peru and back again, which the young Juan Manuel won in an old Chevy sedan with long-range fuel tanks inside the cockpit, and nothing in the way of roll-cage, racing overalls or fire extinguisher. I wonder how Schuey would cope with that

Sadly, today’s Fl stars only get the opportunity to excel in one discipline. Schumacher went well for Sauber in endurance racing in 1990-91. But, as is the way of things, once he broke into Formula One he was lost to everything else. Stirling Moss, perhaps the most versatile of all, raced anything and everything, often in the same day (and tended to be quicker than Fangio in sportscars). He also shone in rallying.

I’ve always liked the tale of Clark at Rouen in 1964. Having qualified on pole for the French Grand Prix in the Lotus 25, he was offered a run in Patrick Lindsay’s ERA, which had just taken pole for the supporting historic race. Clark had never driven anything remotely like this tall, spidery old car. But, after asking how the pre-selector gearbox worked, he went out for four exploratory laps and was immediately appreciably faster than Lindsay himself, who knew ‘Remus’ so well. And Rouen, remember, was a dauntingly fast road circuit, with its notorious high-speed swerves down to the cobbled Nouveau Monde hairpin.

By contrast, when David Coulthard had to demonstrate a Mercedes-Benz W196 at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, he admitted that he didn’t much enjoy the experience, with no seat belts, no driver protection, and very little by his standards in the way of braking or grip. The idea of a multi-discipline motorsporting contest mixing an Fl car around Spa in the rain, a rally car over the flat-out yumps of the Thousand Lakes, perhaps a slingshot rail on a dragstrip, a W125 MercedesBenz on the old Niirburgring, even a Superbike around the Isle of Man is an entertaining thought, but for obvious reasons will remain a fantasy. Anyway, to be a true measure of the successful modern racing driver, it would also have to include negotiating your next contract, having a persuasive dinner with a prospective sponsor, and motivating your mechanics when they’ve got to do their third rebuild of the weekend because you’ve come adrift in qualifying. I suppose we should accept that Fl is already mixeddiscipline enough, and herald Michael Schumacher as a thoroughly worthy champion in his own time. Il