Epic racing in Chinese GP was boosted by F1's new button

F1
Mark Hughes
March 16, 2026

After artificial-looking overtaking in Melbourne, the 2026 Chinese Grand Prix saw a return to F1 drivers following closely and then out-braking each other. Mark Hughes on the Shanghai spectacle

George Russell and Charles Leclerc wheel to wheel in 2026 F1 Chinese Grand Prix

Boost function helped to prolong the Ferrari-Mercedes battle

Mercedes-AMG

Mark Hughes
March 16, 2026

Kimi Antonelli became the second-youngest grand prix winner a day after becoming the youngest-ever pole-sitter. His team-mate George Russell, after a weekend compromised by a PU glitch in Q3, fought past the Ferraris to make it another Mercedes 1-2, with Lewis Hamilton prevailing over Charles Leclerc for third after many laps of passing and repassing.

On the surface the Chinese Grand Prix followed a remarkably similar pattern to that of Australia last week but with an extended period of yo-yo racing at the front between Mercedes and Ferrari (and also within the Ferrari team). These dices were undeniably thrilling and because they endured longer than in Australia they have given those supportive of the new energy-starved style of racing even more ammunition against those who feel it is too artificial.

The two views are polarised, with Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton speaking for each end of the polarisation:

Verstappen: “We drivers don’t like it and the true fans don’t like it either. The ones who like it just don’t understand racing.

“I’m speaking for the majority of drivers. Some of course will say it’s fantastic because they are winning races, which is understandable. But the regulations have fundamental flaws which can only be improved a little. I hope we can get rid of this as soon as possible… I’d say the same if I were winning races.”

“I think it’s the best racing I’ve experienced in F1″

Hamilton: “I think it’s the best racing I’ve experienced in F1… Hopefully it was an exciting race to watch because it was awesome in the car. It felt like go-karting back and forth, back and forth and you could really position your car in a nice way where there was a thin piece of paper between us sometimes.”

But actually the polarisation has disguised a crucial distinction between the Australian and Chinese races. The less energy-demanding layout of the Shanghai track made the artifice less influential in what was happening. The actual overtakes — as opposed to the positioning which made overtaking attempts feasible — were being conducted in the traditional way of out-braking your opponent rather than powering by with an extra 450bhp.

Charles Leclerc wheel to wheel with George Russell as they battle in the 2026 F1 Chinese Grand Prix

Leclerc vs Russell in Shanghai

Mercedes-AMG

In Melbourne we deplored how the early laps Leclerc/Russell dice was only so because Russell would suddenly be 450bhp down on Leclerc as they raced up to Turn 9 and so the passing was purely down to power, not skill. In China, it wasn’t really playing out in the same way. The battery of both the leading and following car would be spent relatively early on that super-long back straight so the difference between one running out and the other still deploying for an extra second or so wasn’t usually anywhere near the point where the crucial overtake would be made. Instead it tended simply to bring the following driver close enough to attempt a conventional out-braking move at the end of the straight. They would then typically harvest enough under braking for Turns 14 and 15 to not be energy-starved down to Turn 1 and they could fight that whole 1-2-3 sequence out in the traditional way.

This wasn’t the ‘overtake on a motorway’ type of pass we were seeing at Melbourne Turn 9. There were also some ballsy passes through the T7-8-9 sequence. The new formula still produced a yo-yo style of racing but it was a function of the opposing traits of the Mercedes and Ferrari – and how the boost facility interacted with that.

Related article

The pattern of the racing as the boost button facility allows the following car extra harvesting and deployment of energy once it’s within 1sec behind was just as influential in the competitive structure of the race as in its high-octane playing out. Because the Ferrari, with its small turbo, inevitably gets off the line faster than the Mercs it establishes track position over them, making their locking out of the front row almost irrelevant. Because the Ferrari is also faster through the corners it makes it awkward for the Mercedes drivers to pass. But even once they do so, the Ferrari drivers can use their boost buttons to stay in touch and repass.

The Mercedes is more powerful but slower through the turns. The power advantage is worth more lap time than it’s losing through the corners and so it’s a faster car overall, but not by enough to pull itself out of Ferrari’s boost range without great difficulty.

So why is this boost function allowing the dicing to last so much longer than the previous DRS system? Three reasons: 1) It’s available at any point on the circuit. 2) It gives you more energy over the lap. 3) Despite giving you more energy, deploying it actually increases your lap time (because it depletes energy that could be used more optimally elsewhere) whereas the DRS would reduce your lap time.

Point number 3 means that if a Mercedes – in this case Antonelli – can get out of the Ferrari’s boost range and is therefore no longer forced to use its own boost button to defend, it is immediately up to 0.8sec faster than when it was being forced to use the boost function. It soon pulls out of reach of the Ferrari which is then left waiting for a safety car to get close enough to renew the battle. Without that, the battle is essentially over once the Mercedes gets that 1sec+ advantage. For Antonelli this was lap 20, for Russell it was nine laps later. But that’s how long it takes and in the meantime some epic wheel-to-wheel action ensued.

Lewis Hamilton leads at the start of the 2026 F1 Chinese Grand Prix

Ferraris were faster off the line, but they couldn’t leave the Mercedes behind

Grand Prix Photo

There’s another factor here. The cars are aerodynamically better-suited to racing than before. “The cars are easier to follow,” says Hamilton, “much better than in past years. You can get very close. There’s not such a bad wake where you’re losing too much downforce.”

So the fundamental unease of drivers lifting through crucial corners — especially in qualifying — to set a faster lap time remains. But the stark nonsense on race day of cars only passing at the end of straights when they had ludicrously more power was not really a fair criticism of the Shanghai race.