MPH: F1 has its best drivers ever, says McLaren boss. He has a point

F1
Mark Hughes
November 14, 2025

McLaren team principal Andrea Stella believes the current F1 generation is the most competitive in history and called on reporters to scrutinise the claim. Mark Hughes didn't need any more encouragement

Norris with Hamilton and verstappen alongside Clark Brabham and Hill

Two great F1 generations: Andrea Stella believes that Norris, Hamilton and Verstappen (left) compete in a more competitive era than Clark, Brabham and Hill

Mark Hughes
November 14, 2025

At the Sao Paulo Grand Prix McLaren team principal Andrea Stella said the following:

“I think what we see in this season in Formula 1, in terms of competitiveness — and this is something that you may pick for a little bit of analysis — I don’t recall that there was such a competitive pool of drivers in any other season.

“The new generation of drivers, they’re just so good, and now you have seven, eight drivers which are at world championship level. Like I say, I’m not sure this has happened before.”

Well, there’s a challenge. It is indeed a good subject for a bit of analysis. We do indeed have a remarkable crop at the moment with Max Verstappen, Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso proven multiple champions — and Charles Leclerc, George Russell, Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri all capable of winning a title. We might be able to add Carlos Sainz and Alex Albon to that list and soon probably the starring rookies Isack Hadjar, Oliver Bearman, Gabriel Bortoleto and Kimi Antonelli.

If we look back at the history of the world championship and divide it into eras, we can say that while the depth of talent down the grid in the 1950s was less than today it witnessed one of the very greatest, Juan Manuel Fangio, at the height of his powers being challenged early in his career by the stunningly fast Alberto Ascari and towards the end of it by the genius of Stirling Moss. There were other great drivers — Froilan Gonzalez, Tony Brooks, Peter Collins, Mike Hawthorn — but take a look at the pace difference between the great and the good, when pushing up to the limit carried altogether darker consequences than today, and it’s apparent that there was a sharper drop-off from great to good than now. Back then it would be no disgrace as a team-mate to be 1sec per lap or more slower than someone such as Fangio or Ascari. That would get you podiums and occasional race victories. Today it would get you the sack.

Maserati of Juan Manuel Fangio in 1957 Italian Grand Prix

Fangio’s ability to take his cars to the limit left lesser drivers far behind

Grand Prix Photo

In the transition to the rear-engined F1 a new generation was initially measured against the towering ability of Moss — a challenge which Jack Brabham, Jim Clark and John Surtees in particular were measuring up to — before Stirling’s career-ending accident early in 1962. But a truly great generation formed in those years. In addition to Surtees, Brabham and Clark — who came to rival Fangio’s status as a contender for the greatest of all time — came Dan Gurney and Graham Hill. Four of those five were world champions and Gurney could have been with better team choices. Denny Hulme sneaked an under-the-radar title in there in ’67. They overlapped with the thrusting new generation of Jackie Stewart, Jochen Rindt, Jacky Ickx and Chris Amon in the late ‘60s. Stewart came to dominate that generation but got out while he still could, having witnessed some horrible carnage. That tended to limit the career lengths of drivers – even those who survived unscathed tended not to hang around too long.

As Stewart retired with a then record 27 grand prix wins, the generation which had been competing hard with him latterly came to have maybe even greater depth: Emerson Fittipaldi, Ronnie Peterson, Mario Andretti, Niki Lauda, James Hunt and Jody Scheckter were the acknowledged top dogs. But on any given day they may have been beaten by Carlos Reutemann, John Watson, Patrick Depailler, Jacques Laffite or Carlos Pace. Then there were the super-talented Shadow duo Tom Pryce and Jean-Pierre Jarier and latterly the era-transitioning Alan Jones. Not all of them survived, and perhaps there wasn’t the overriding talisman genius – no Fangio, Clark or Stewart – but that mid 70s era featured a fabulous depth of talent.

Related article

The 15 best F1 drivers of all time
F1

The 15 best F1 drivers of all time

With Max Verstappen already on four Formula 1 titles, where should he sit in the list of the greatest Formula 1 drivers in history? Here’s our latest verdict on the top 15

By Motor Sport

Jones straddled eras and came to star in the early ’80s against the incomparably gifted Gilles Villeneuve, super-shrewd and smart Nelson Piquet, the sadly doomed Didier Pironi, the genius of Alain Prost, and the charging Rene Arnoux. As Jones retired he was replaced by Keke Rosberg and Nigel Mansell, two red-line adrenaline performers, among the most exciting of all time and soon to be challenged and surpassed by the extraordinary Ayrton Senna. That mid-’80s turbo period was incredibly exciting and, as in the ’50s, the cars sorted out the men from the boys very effectively. There maybe weren’t as many potential champions as in the mid-’70s, but there was an overriding all-time great in Senna and they took the challenge to him, Prost and Mansell in particular, into the ’90s.

The actual level being reached is probably greater than ever before

Just as we were denied longer Moss-Clark or Clark-Stewart changeovers, so we got only a tragic glimpse of Senna-Schumacher. Schumacher’s intensity was perfect for the increasingly instrumented and scientific era as the ’90s developed and the size of the teams ballooned with money. Mika Hakkinen was his great rival. There were days when these two were head and shoulders above the others, other days when Schumacher operated on his own level. But Damon Hill and Jacques Villeneuve had days of greatness along the way to their titles. There were many good drivers in this time, but perhaps it was a little light on greats.

Hakkinen retired, exhausted, as Schumacher pressed on to record-breaking glories against a new slew of challengers: Juan Pablo Montoya, Kimi Räikkönen, Fernando Alonso, Jenson Button. Alonso was happy to get down and dirty and beneath Michael’s skin and as such the 2006 season stands out as a vintage one, a contest that had been bubbling for years as Alonso drove slower cars than Schumacher’s Ferrari.

Nigel Mansell and Ayrton Senna battle in 1986 F1 Spanish GP

Mansell took the fight to Senna – here at Jerez in 1986

Grand Prix Photo

When Schumacher retired Alonso might have expected to be the uncontested number 1, but who was this rookie in the other McLaren? Thus the legend of Lewis Hamilton took shape. Sebastian Vettel and Robert Kubica showed they had the stuff to go wheel-to-wheel and even beat them. Nico Rosberg was fast and super-smart. Mark Webber and Felipe Massa were potential champions as Alonso, Raikkonen and Button continued to add depth. This was a very strong era and preceded the current Verstappen-dominated one.

So while the current grid is indeed dripping with talent, it’s not quite unprecedented to have so much of it in one place. It’s happened before. But what is different is that the actual level being reached – as opposed to the raw ability of the drivers – is probably greater than ever before. Thanks to data analysis.

“These guys, since go-karting they have the data,” says Stella. “They train at a certain level when they are adolescents. This has made the competitive field extremely, extremely tight, and therefore the difference is in this last one percent.”