Rivals question Ferrari engine advantage as the FIA investigate Renault over an alleged illegal brake system
Ferrari and Renault tech is under the spotlight Photo: Motorsport Images
Interesting times behind the scenes in F1 with just a couple of weeks to go before the 2021 regulations are announced. Simultaneously there are a couple of key points of contention about interpretation of the current rules.
But there is a very important distinction between the questioning by rivals of Ferrari’s power unit and the protest that’s been made by Racing Point over Renault’s alleged automatic brake bias adjustment system.
Rivals have queried the FIA about whether an oil-cooled intercooler might ‘inadvertently’ leak some oil into the combustion process, thereby increasing the calorific content in the otherwise fuel flow-limited engine.
This is what at least one of the other engine manufacturers believes Ferrari is doing, but it’s essentially only a guess. It follows from speculation about a way being found of cooling the fuel before it enters the combustion chamber and about how its double ERS battery may have been able to subvert the sensor.
Related content
Have rivals identified Ferrari’s engine advantage? Photo: Motorsport Images
The FIA has not given a specific reply, possibly because to do so accurately would reveal something that is a legitimate competitive advantage. The governing body’s position on this specific query is that if a team feels another is breaking the rules then it should submit an official protest. This is very much aligned with the position the late Charlie Whiting took last year when the twin battery system was at the centre of speculation.
“We’re pretty sure we now know how it works,” said Charlie at Monaco last year after extensive explanations from the team. “It’s very clever – and as far as we’re concerned, completely legal.” In the way that the FIA is reacting to the latest query, it sounds as if it believes much the same this time around.
By contrast, Racing Point is not making any tentative enquiries to the FIA about what it believes is a corner-by-corner, circuit-specific automatic brake bias adjustment on the Renault. Instead, post-race Suzuka it put its money down and made an official protest. This is a very specific and detailed protest (it ran to 12 pages) outlining why it believes Renault is using such a system which would contravene article 27.1 of the sporting regulations which states the driver must drive the car alone and unaided. Components from the Renault have been impounded while the FIA conducts an investigation.
Renault brake components impounded as FIA investigate Photo: Motorsport Images
Although Renault says it is confident it can defend its case ‘vigorously’ this has potentially very serious consequences if found guilty. It would place the parent company in an embarrassing position and the last time it was in such a situation (in 2009 after the ‘crashgate’ of Singapore ’08 was revealed) it left F1 for several years. With the sport in such a delicate stage of negotiations about 2021 and beyond, it needs all the support it can muster.
In the last three decades, almost every F1 champion has owed part of their success to Ross Brawn or Adrian Newey, who looks set to leave Red Bull. In that way, they've had a greater impact on GP racing than any driver during that time, says Mark Hughes
An impatient Max Verstappen was forced off track in his rash bid to pass Lewis Hamilton at the 2018 Chinese GP. Last weekend, in the same situation, at the same corner, he bided his time. Mark Hughes examines the shifting statures of the two champions
Fifty years ago, Ferrari boss Luca di Montezemolo leapt into the air as Niki Lauda won the 1974 Spanish Grand Prix, claiming his first victory in the F1 championship. Matt Bishop recounts the remarkable race
Will Zhou Guanyu's first Chinese GP as an F1 driver also be his last? Chris Medland on an emotional homecoming. Plus, points galore, with a proposal to expand the points places and an unwelcome tally for Fernando Alonso