Not just genius: Why Verstappen and Senna still needed the right car on the day

F1
Mark Hughes
September 24th 2025

Both driving geniuses, even Ayrton Senna at Donington and Max Verstappen at Baku showed that supreme skill shines best when the car, on that day, is willing, says Mark Hughes

Ayrton Senna (McLaren-Ford) takes the lead from Alain Prost (Williams-Renault) at the end of the first lap in the wet 1993 European Grand Prix

Senna's Donington 1993 drive was genius, but his McLaren's role in the win is often overlooked

Grand Prix Photo

Mark Hughes
September 24th 2025

A second consecutive, and particularly brilliant, victory from Max Verstappen around Baku last weekend is inviting comparisons with Ayrton Senna‘s 1993 season. In each case, the recognised best driver was not in the best car and not really in title contention but was capable of slipping through the tiniest slit of an opportunity to conjure victories. These against-the-odds performances may even add more to the legendary status of such drivers than their more successful seasons.

But invariably, it’s rarely as simple as the romantic notion of the genius driver more than overcoming the performance deficit of his car through sheer virtuosity. It’s usually more that their extreme talent ensures they are ready to capitalise when the overall faster car has been compromised, that every time such an opportunity presents itself, they are there to pounce. Always them, every time.

There is no question that the 1993 Williams-Renault was a faster car than the McLaren-Ford of the same year, just as there is no question that the 2025 McLaren is a faster car than the current Red Bull. But that is as measured over the global range of circuits comprising the championship. It can occasionally be that the overall fastest car is not actually the fastest on a given day. But the status sticks, the general assumption is that the fastest car is always the fastest car and any time therefore it is beaten, it must be because of driving genius in the slower car. That’s usually a flawed assumption.

We need to be very careful with words here. The genius level driver is still the genius level driver even on the days when the prime reason they’ve won is because their car on that day – regardless of it overall being a slower car than the best – is actually fully competitive. But the dominant narrative – only partially true – will inevitably be that it’s all down to the genius. If we think back to one of the greatest demonstrations of driving genius of all time – Ayrton Senna, Donington ’93 – he needed all that supreme ability to do what he did that day. But in those wet conditions, the high downforce McLaren MP4/8 was actually a very competitive car. Its power deficit to the all-round superior Williams FW15C didn’t count for much. Furthermore, the conditions on that day exposed a little glitch in the Williams software which tended to lock up the rear wheels on downshifts at low speeds. It was also suffering from a dragging clutch, exacerbating the problem. So Alain Prost was unable to use late braking in defence. It later emerged that the tyre pressures were too high because of a measuring equipment fault.

Related article

So on that day, in those circumstances, which car would you rather be in? A high-grip, well-balanced McLaren. Or a nervous, ill-balanced Williams, which was trying to throw you off the road unless you drove it a little below the ostensible limit?

All of that is not to say Senna’s genius played no part. I was there and recall a particular phase of the race when the rain was falling and Senna on slicks was still pulling away from Prost on wets. Senna’s genius was absolutely required to take full advantage of this rare opportunity. But the dominant reason for the opportunity was car-related.

A similar thing happened at Baku last weekend. Yes, the McLaren drivers under-performed and yes, Verstappen was absolutely stunning and yes, the McLaren is overall a significantly faster car than the Red Bull.

Ayrton Senna (McLaren-Ford) in front of Michael Schumacher (Benetton-Ford) in the wet 1993 Brazilian Grand Prix

Senna took the inferior 1993 McLaren to five wins

Grand Prix Photo

Max Verstappen (Red Bull-Honda) during the 2025 Azerbaijan Grand Prix

Red Bull is flawed but can be fast, as Verstappen has shown

Grand Prix Photo

But in low-downforce trim, the McLaren is a tricky drive and the Red Bull is very aero-efficient and now quite driveable too. Now throw in wild gusting wind and occasional drizzle in qualifying, you can bet the Red Bull was a more confidence-inspiring drive than the McLaren on that day. Verstappen’s genius did the rest.

That’s what Andrea Stella was getting at when he said, “These kinds of circuits don’t seem to suit our car very well in terms of its strengths, but at the same time, definitely there was more available in the car than yesterday in qualifying, and today in the race we did not exploit.”