2027 MotoGP bikes will have '30% to 50% less' downforce

MotoGP
Mat Oxley
November 5, 2025

A fascinating chat with Aprilia tech boss Fabiano Sterlacchini, during which we discuss MotoGP's new rules, how he's helped transform the RS-GP into a title contender, how the bike's so-called leg wings work and why Marco Bezzecchi is a feedback genius

Marcho Bezzechi, Aprilia

Bezzecchi scored one victory and seven further podiums between Silverstone and Phillip Island, suggesting Aprilia can fight for the riders' title in 2026

Michelin

Mat Oxley
November 5, 2025

Aprilia is close to completing its best-ever MotoGP season, with two victories from two riders (Marco Bezzecchi and Raúl Fernández) and – depending on how the final two rounds go – a best-ever runner-up finish in the constructors’ championship and a best-ever third in the riders’ championship.

The Noale factory’s MotoGP project struggled like hell until 2020, when engineers replaced the RS-GP’s narrow 75-degree V4 engine with a 90-degree V4, as used so successfully by Ducati and Honda.

Immediately, the bike was transformed.

“I did three laps [at the start of 2020 pre-season testing at Sepang], came into the garage and I was crying,” Aprilia stalwart Aleix Espargaró told me a couple of years ago. “I told the engineers, ‘This is the best bike you ever made, it’s crazy, unbelievably good!’ I was crying because at the end of 2019 I was thinking of retiring, because with the old bike it was impossible to be fast.”

Instead of mostly struggling to get into the top 10, the new bike quickly became a podium challenger, with Espargaró scoring its first top-three finish in 2021 and its first victory the following year.

Over the last few years, the RS-GP has been as good as the Ducati, on its day. The problem was consistency from track to track, with the bike working well over faster, flowing layouts and not so well at stop-and-go circuits, mainly due to issues in braking and acceleration.

Fabiano Sterlacchini’s arrival has definitely helped Aprilia take the final steps towards creating a genuine championship challenger, although a gloomy weekend at Sepang last month suggested they’re not quite there yet.

The 2025 RS-GP’s most visible upgrade so far is the so-called leg wings, which sprout out of either side of the bike’s seat unit. So what exactly do they do? And what does Sterlacchini expect from MotoGP’s new technical era, starting 2027, with smaller engines, less aero and no ride-height devices?

Sterlacchini has worked in MotoGP since 2002, when he joined Ducati’s MotoGP project, working in vehicle dynamic analysis and simulation, then as a chassis designer and finally as technical coordinator. Three years as KTM‘s MotoGP technical coordinator followed, before he joined Aprilia at the end of last year.

DSC_4273-800x450.jpg

Sterlacchini, deep in thought in the Aprilia garage at Mugello

Oxley: What were the main areas of performance you were looking to improve when you came to Aprilia?

Sterlacchini: When I arrived the first comments I collected and what I saw by looking at the bike’s behaviour was the stability of the bike.

There are two types of performance in a racing motorcycle – one is how much the rider is pushing the bike to the bike’s limit and the other is where is that limit.

When you have a bike that is quite unpredictable and quite unstable, the riders will keep a margin [so they’re less likely to crash] when they ride, so that is part of the bike’s performance.

It’s obviously not acceptable to have a margin like this, because you are losing pure performance, so we have worked a lot on improving machine stability in braking and also in the exit.

During the first part of the season with Marco, we had some mistakes in races during braking, so clearly the bike wasn’t as predictable as it should be, so we worked on this aspect, together with a lot of other aspects.

You have also improved the bike’s overall performance…

FS: If you have a spider diagram [in which the length of each ‘leg’ is the competitiveness of the bike in each area], a bike with all the legs more or less the same size can win, but a bike which has some legs much shorter than the others cannot win. So it’s important that you don’t forget all the crucial aspects of performance, because that way you can find a sweeter balance.

In recent years, speaking to Aprilia riders and engineers, braking performance was always the major barrier to better overall performance, so how did you improve this area – aero, engine braking, bike balance or a combination?

FS: Clearly it’s a combination. One important point was that the riders that arrived at Aprilia at the same time as me [Bezzecchi and team-mate Jorge Martín previously rode Ducatis] sometimes complained about the instability of the bike’s [corner-entry] slides, so we worked on engine-brake character, overall bike settings and the position of the rider on the bike, so we worked in all the areas to fix the problem the riders were talking about.

IMG_6275-800x450.jpg

Martin’s RS-GP, ridden by test rider Lorenzo Savadori at Sachsenring

Martin’s RS-GP, ridden by test rider Lorenzo Savadori at Sachsenring

When was the first race with your leg wings?

FS: We first raced them at Silverstone and had the second evolution at Assen, then at Spielberg for Trackhouse.

Aerodynamics is a strange science…

FS: Also for us!

But presumably the leg wings use the airflow that comes over the top of the rider during braking and then flows down his back?

FS: For sure, otherwise they wouldn’t work.

Do they also help in the acceleration phase?

FS: They work behind the rider, so it depends on the position of the rider moving around the bike, because if you want to use them in acceleration, but the rider is completely over the top of the screen [to reduce wheelies] then they work zero, so it depends on the manoeuvre the rider is making, but basically they help more in the entry phase.

Related article

Presumably they only work on the inside, because the rider is leaning off the inside of the bike, so he’s away from the outside leg wing?

FS: You’re going into too much detail…

In the past, Aprilia sometimes struggled during weekends – they’d start well on a Friday, but then lose their way, so have you also improved the way of working in the garage?

FS: Yes, 100%, because apart from the motorcycle itself, the working system you have at the track is also very important. Several times in my life I’ve started a weekend listening to comments from riders who say, ‘This is the worst bike I’ve ever ridden,’ then they win the race on Sunday. This teaches you that even though you start the weekend in a really bad way, there’s always the margin to improve the details and have a really good bike on Sunday.

In our process now, we can say that usually we have quite good performance on Fridays, but how many times have we gone through Q1 into Q2 and then achieved really good success Sunday? That’s exactly the point. At recent races we have reached a good base, where we are only are touching the bike in a small group of details.

Aprilia MotoGP bike

The first iteration of the leg wings, plus new seat hump aero, at Silverstone

This is so important because changing the bike less means the riders know the bike better, so they know what it’s going to do before it does it.

FS: Absolutely. One of the targets, apart from improving the stability of the bike, was improving the stability of the performance over the season, so there’s the base of the bike and there’s what you have to do in the preparation for each weekend.

This is absolutely important, because if you start the weekend at 20% [of maximum performance], maybe you will arrive at 80% on Sunday, but if you start at 70%, it’s much easier to arrive at 95%.

For sure the way we work at the track is part of this process, because now we arrive at each track knowing exactly what we are looking for, relative to that track.

Sometimes when I first came to Aprilia, I was pushing the technicians in several areas [of performance], whereas now they arrive at each track and they already know what they have to do, so the system has improved a lot, together with a realistic approach.

At the start of the year I asked you if data is now more important than rider feedback and you replied, “If it’s not data, it’s merely opinion.” Obviously you need to mix both together, but I wanted to know about the feedback Bezzecchi [British GP winner and six further podiums] gives you, because this is his first year in a factory team, so this is this first time he’s worked with factory engineers.

FS: I’ve worked in MotoGP for almost a quarter of a century, and for me Marco is in the top five – he gives incredible feedback.

IMG_6798-800x450.jpg

The second iteration of the leg wings plus new seat-hump aero

Who are the others?

FS: I think Andrea Dovizioso is probably the best – super analytical. Also Valentino [Rossi]. Marco could be in the top four.

I think that when many people think about a rider like Marco, he looks like a super-funny, creative guy. But compared to many other riders that are super-calm, then a bit chaotic and super-aggressive when they put on their helmets, Marco is the other way around. Several times in debriefs, I’ve thought that this is the VR46 imprinting. Probably they taught him to stay focused, work on the details and transfer information in the proper way.

This year is the first time Marco has worked with a proper factory team, so in the past sometimes he had a bike that wasn’t suited to his riding characteristics, whereas now we make the bike around Marco’s needs. He’s super-good at transferring information and also at creating a package that’s versatile. It’s the same working with Raul [Fernández, winner of the Australian GP].

Bezzecchi still seems to be on a steep upward curve, both in his riding and his mentality, like he’s not at the top yet.

FS: It’s difficult to say but maybe we have a typical Pareto Principle situation: with 20% of effort, you obtain 80% of the result, but to obtain the last 20% of the result, you have to dedicate 80% [more] work.

With Marco, I cannot tell you exactly where he is, if he’s still on the growth part of his curve, or if he will soon arrive on a sort of plateau.

With the bike, how much margin do we have? We have something of a margin [to the fastest bikes], so we are developing, we are thinking, we are putting forward ideas. Obviously we don’t want to make mistakes, because it’s clear that the base at which we’ve arrived now is more than acceptable.

Mid-season, you updated the Trackhouse bikes to the latest factory spec, because now it’s so important to have data from four identical bikes. And the more data you have, the more help artificial intelligence can be in helping you sift through all that data, so how much are you using AI?

FS: We are approaching AI and we are investigating how we can exploit this kind of new technology to improve our performance, but we are approaching it, not using it.

Raúl Fernández, Trackhouse Aprilia

Fernández made history at Phillip Island – Aprilia’s first indie winner

Michelin

It seems that one big thing AI can do is look at a vast pool of data and tell you what’s of interest to you and what isn’t.

FS: Yes, because clearly we have much more information than we can analyse and extract valuable data conclusions from. AI is something that can help in the future, but believe me, it’s super- complicated because you have to prepare all the data and then you have to do the ingestion phase, when you are teaching the system, so it’s a really long process and we don’t have time. At the moment it’s something that’s very interesting, which we are looking at.

What are you expecting from the 2027 bikes? They’ll have smaller engines, be slightly lighter, with less aero and no ride-height devices, so you must already have computer-modelled what they’ll be like.

FS: It’s difficult because we don’t know the most relevant part…

The tyres?

FS: Yes, but anyway it’s quite clear, we will have much less power. The crucial point in the first year at least will be to find again the balance of the bike, because now, with the power we have and the behaviour of the Michelin tyres, basically we know where the centre of gravity should be, how the aero should be and so on.

From 2027 we won’t have the aerodynamics we have now, we will have less power and we won’t have the devices, so obviously the crucial point will be to find a new balance, a new compromise, that suits the level of power, aero etc.

Bikes will have narrower bodywork and the fairing nose will be moved behind the front wheel axle, reducing aero load on the front tyre, so do you have any estimate of how much less downforce you will have?

FS: I believe we will have between 30 and 50% less.

Wow! Presumably that will help the racing, because less downforce means smaller aero wakes behind the bikes and less dirty air.

FS: It’s not so obvious, but if you mean the problems regarding overtaking, I think it will be easier, definitely.

Aprilia celebrate its first win with Bezzecchi, at Silverstone in May

Aprilia celebrates its first win with Bezzecchi, at Silverstone in May

Aprilia

How happy will you be to say goodbye to ride-height devices?

FS: I think it’s the correct decision. We probably should have done so before because we often speak about environmental sustainability, but in racing we must also think about economic sustainability.

One of the manufacturers led the way with this technology, then the others copied, so basically the performance levelled again and now it’s just a cost matter. When someone comes up with a new idea, then the others catch up after a few years, it’s in the interest of the championship that we should say, OK, now it’s banned.

I also believe that during starts, if we don’t have holeshot devices, probably the riders will be much more able to decide their line, because now they are completely stuck. So I think it’s the right choice to ban the devices.

The cost of developing new engines is crazy, so do you think it was necessary to drop to 850cc? Or would it better to manage performance with tyres, which is basically a zero-cost option?

FS: At Mugello we are reaching 366km/h [227mph], which is something you cannot reduce via different tyres. You have to reduce the power or do other things. Reducing the displacement is the best way, because it’s easier to control. There are other ways, for example, reducing fuel capacity or restricting fuel flow.

Related article

The main problem is that every time you are in a technical meeting [with all the manufacturers] everyone wants what is most convenient for them. So these rules should be imposed from the top, so the championship promoter says, ‘This is the solution, these are the technical rules’.

MotoGP is the other way, this is the problem. Because when you have technicians [from different manufacturers] meeting around a table you have a problem. So I think [the promoters making the final decision] is the most pragmatic way, so everything is fixed.

My personal opinion is that if there’s a new technical evolution and it’s banned, that’s too extreme. I don’t like it. But in MotoGP we are in the other direction, which is also too extreme. Thinking about costs, from MotoGP in 2002 to what we have now, clearly some decisions need to come from the top,

It’s like having the laws of a country decided by the people, rather than by the government. It’s clear that you decide the rules in your family and you live your life, but you need the government to decide the laws in the interests of the country. It’s the same in MotoGP.