Factory methods of the vintage era

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

No. 15: Rolls-Royce

Soon after this series was instituted we took a look at the careful and academical methods of construction which made Rolls-Royce cars what they were in 1928. Long before that, circa 1912, F. Henry Royce, yet to be knighted, had evolved his famous, or notorious, bumping-rig, for stressing Rolls-Royce chassis to extremes.

It was said that a well-known American car was chained to this simple but terribly exacting R-R test-bed and lasted for only three minutes. Fourteen other famous cars were reported to have been broken up on it. The story was that although R-R had its own test track at Derby in those pre-1914 days and even went so far as to lay down on it pig-iron bars at six-foot intervals, over which test chassis were then driven, this wasn’t deemed sufficiently punishing and so Royce evolved his bumping rig. The wheels carrying the bump-cams were apparently eight feet in diameter, the chassis for test being kept in place by chaining it to concrete posts in the test house.

After the war the American Springfield branch of Rolls-Royce Ltd. made much of this static but destructive testing, saying that only R-R used such a machine (Dunlop used something similar for testing high-speed tyres to destruction and for assessing steering reaction, in more recent times) and that as a result the R-R technique of using lots of small bolts and nuts at important joints, the use of tubular cross-members, the diagonal braces to the front dumb-irons, the ball-joint mounting for the radiator, the employment of serrations for uniting steering gear and brake corrections, and, indeed three-quarters of the entire car were redesigned from data obtained in this way. It was said that Royce discovered from his bumping-machine that rivets could not be safely used on the chassis frame. Instead, he substituted taper bolts of nickel steel—it was claimed that no car other than a Silver Ghost used such bolts, in 1921.

Other “exclusives” which Springfield claimed for the Rolls-Royce were the integral test pieces of side-members, light alloy crankcase, crankshaft forging, bronze timing gears, gearbox casing, etc. which were laboratory inspected and put on a baby bumping-machine to check the quality of raw materials, heat-treatment, etc. The American publicists also claimed that forged eyes for the front road springs and con-rod forgings machined to remove 3/16 in. of the outer skin, reducing the weight from 8 lb. each in the rough to 2 lb. each when finished, were exclusive to Rolls-Royce. They also made the remarkable statement that Rolls-Royce’s raw materials “cost more than a fine eight-cylinder limousine complete”, whatever that may mean…

By 1923 Springfield Silver Ghosts had close-plating of the nickel parts (again, this was claimed as exclusive to the make), the 32 lb. brake drums were machined from forgings weighing 106 lb., all copper pipe connections were brazed, not soldered, (is this a blinding flash of the obvious?), R-R made all their own nuts, using square-headed, not hexagonal bolts, spring washers were used only for external nuts, otherwise castellated nuts were used, and only four items on the chassis were steel castings, all other steel parts being of rolled steel of forgings, cast-iron being confined to cylinder blocks, piston rings and brake-shoe liners for the side brake—if American publicity can be trusted.

By 1935 more modern machinery, jigs and fixtures were being used in the making of Rolls-Royce and Bentley cars, and the main bearings of the crankshaft were machine bored and reamed rather than hand-scraped, although every surface of the crankshaft, even the webs, were ground to a fine finish.

The gears had their teeth profile ground and the mating shafts were accurately splined and the bearings for them aligned and fitted by mechanical means instead of being stoned by hand and lapped, as in the 1920s. But every gearbox and back axle was individually tested under load. Pistons, including the gudgeon-pin boxes were still diamond turned. It is also interesting to recall that in 1935 Rolls-Royce were still making their own shock-absorbers and all main electrical equipment, and, of course, the radiator.

At Derby they had the benefit of those famous foundries dealing with iron, light alloys and bronze, from which the special R-R light alloys used in the Schneider Trophy aero-engines emanated, and a heat-treatment plant for hardening and tempering alloy steels. The practice of breaking test pieces off components and critically examining them was still in use in the days of 20/25 h.p. and Phantom II production, and the worm and nut steering gear was still run-in on a test-rig. Incidentally, an oil dash-pot was introduced into the controversial R-R gearbox-driven mechanical servo brake system at about this time, purely to obviate a faint click which emanated from it previously when used while reversing.

Each engine was, after assembly, run for four hours on town gas, while filtered oil from an external supply was circulated through it—without danger of petrol pollution of the lubricant. Each gearbox was tested separately, then assembled to its engine. The complete power unit was then run for seven hours on petrol on a Froude dynamometer, during the course of which power and fuel consumption standards were checked. The complete chassis was then given a test lasting some eight hours on a rolling-road dynamometer, power and torque at the back wheels being measured in every gear. The chassis then went out on the road for some 30 miles and, if it satisfied the tester, it was fitted with a sound-accentuating closed test body and each Rolls-Royce or Bentley was driven for at least 50 miles to check that it was running quietly— if not less noisily than its dashboard clock! If it passed this check it was tested again by individual testers and the chassis was ready for its coachwork, after which it was finally road-tested again by Rolls-Royce Ltd.—which caused W. A. Robotham, in his intriguing book “Silver Ghosts and Silver Dawn” (Constable, 1970), to remark that it was a marvel that the vehicle was not completely worn out before it had its body fitted! He is equally scathing about the famous R-R test pieces, remarking that as each piece “weighed several pounds it cost quite a sum to machine”, and no case could be found of a crankshaft being rejected as a result of these tensile tests of sample pieces. Probably Sir Henry Royce would have referred to it as an insurance policy, however…

The 20/25-h.p. and 40/50-h.p. Rolls-Royce and the 3 1/2-litre Bentley chassis were built up each on their own assembly line in 1935, the three lines adjacent. Not far away the engineering apprentices fortunate enough to be at Derby toiled in the middle of a busy machine shop. I wonder if any of them thought to photograph the test chassis as they left the works and roamed the local roads?—W. B.

You may also like

Related products